本文選題：加重?cái)?shù)額 + 累計(jì)計(jì)算��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)刑法中的犯罪概念采用“既定性又定量”模式，《刑法》第13條是總則中定量因素的概括性規(guī)定，分則犯罪構(gòu)成中定量因素則是其具體體現(xiàn)，數(shù)額便是分則具體犯罪構(gòu)成中定量因素的表征，加重?cái)?shù)額則是數(shù)額加重犯的定量因素�！缎谭ā酚嘘P(guān)數(shù)額加重犯的規(guī)定主要體現(xiàn)在財(cái)產(chǎn)、經(jīng)濟(jì)類犯罪中，其不僅占據(jù)一定規(guī)模，而且司法實(shí)踐中也常面臨相關(guān)司法適用問(wèn)題，本文旨在對(duì)數(shù)額加重犯的相關(guān)問(wèn)題展開研究，以期為相關(guān)犯罪的立法完善和司法適用助力。文章共約三萬(wàn)二千字，分以下幾個(gè)部分： 第一部分首先對(duì)數(shù)額加重犯的概念進(jìn)行了闡述，肯定數(shù)額加重犯概念的存在具有合理性，明確加重?cái)?shù)額不僅僅是量刑情節(jié)，更是一種犯罪構(gòu)成事實(shí)，為探討其他相關(guān)問(wèn)題奠定基礎(chǔ)；緊接著歸納分析數(shù)額加重犯在國(guó)內(nèi)外刑法中的立法體現(xiàn)；其次論述數(shù)額加重犯與情節(jié)加重犯、結(jié)果加重犯之間的區(qū)分，強(qiáng)調(diào)主要表現(xiàn)為加重因素的不同；最后對(duì)數(shù)額加重犯進(jìn)行分類，對(duì)不同類型數(shù)額加重犯的特征和法律適用進(jìn)行剖析。 第二部分在上述基礎(chǔ)上，進(jìn)一步對(duì)數(shù)額加重犯的加重因素（加重?cái)?shù)額）進(jìn)行論述。本部分首先闡述加重?cái)?shù)額的特征；其次對(duì)數(shù)額的性質(zhì)進(jìn)行論述，主張數(shù)額的性質(zhì)應(yīng)是一種構(gòu)成要件要素；最后對(duì)累計(jì)數(shù)額相關(guān)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行重點(diǎn)探討，強(qiáng)調(diào)刑法規(guī)定的累計(jì)計(jì)算規(guī)則應(yīng)當(dāng)是一種處理罪數(shù)的特殊規(guī)則，只要規(guī)定了累計(jì)計(jì)算均可以適用，而不僅僅只是連續(xù)犯、徐行犯的情形下才適用。 第三部分通過(guò)闡述數(shù)額加重犯既遂、未遂的區(qū)分，明確數(shù)額加重犯存在既遂、未遂形態(tài)，并在此基礎(chǔ)上討論其具體認(rèn)定，主張運(yùn)用犯罪既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的層次性理論來(lái)認(rèn)定數(shù)額加重犯的既遂，未遂則要在主客觀相統(tǒng)一原則下根據(jù)不同情形作出不同處理；最后探討數(shù)額加重犯未遂的處罰問(wèn)題，對(duì)“部分既遂部分未遂”情形，認(rèn)為應(yīng)以累計(jì)數(shù)額為前提，，區(qū)分不同情形，綜合運(yùn)用“整體既遂說(shuō)”和“整體未遂說(shuō)”，確保量刑的科學(xué)性、合理性。
[Abstract]:The concept of crime in the criminal law of our country adopts the pattern of "fixed and quantitative". Article 13 of the Criminal Law is the general stipulation of the quantitative factor in the general rule, and the quantitative factor in the constitution of the crime in the special provision is its concrete embodiment.The amount is the representation of the quantitative factor in the constitution of the specific crime, and the aggravated amount is the quantitative factor of the aggravated crime of the amount. The provisions of the Criminal Law concerning the aggravated crime of the amount are mainly embodied in the property, and in the economic crime, it not only occupies a certain scale,And the judicial practice also often faces the related judicial application problem, this article aims to carry on the research to the amount aggravated crime related question, in order to help the legislation consummation and the judicial application of the related crime.The article consists of about 32000 words, which is divided into the following parts:The first part expounds the concept of aggravated crime of amount, affirms that the existence of the concept of aggravated crime of the amount is reasonable, it is clear that the aggravated amount is not only the circumstances of sentencing, but also a fact of crime.In order to lay a foundation for the discussion of other relevant issues; then sum up and analyze the amount of aggravated crime in the criminal law at home and abroad in the legislative embodiment; secondly, discuss the amount of aggravated crime and aggravating circumstances, the distinction between the result of aggravated crime,Finally, the author classifies the amount aggravated crime, and analyzes the characteristics and the law application of the different amount aggravated crime.The second part, on the basis of the above, further discusses the aggravating factors (aggravating amount).This part first expounds the characteristics of the aggravated amount; secondly, discusses the nature of the amount, arguing that the nature of the amount should be a constituent element; finally, focuses on the issues related to the cumulative amount.It is emphasized that the accumulative calculation rule stipulated in the criminal law should be a special rule for dealing with the number of crimes, so long as the accumulative calculation can be applied, not just the continuous crime, but only in the case of Xu Xing's crime.In the third part, by expounding the distinction between accomplished crime and attempted crime, it is clear that the crime of aggravated amount exists the form of accomplished crime and attempted crime, and on the basis of this, the author discusses its specific determination.It is advocated to use the hierarchical theory of the standard of accomplished crime to determine the accomplice of aggravated crime in amount, and the attempt should be dealt with differently according to different circumstances under the principle of unity of subject and object. Finally, the problem of punishment of attempted crime of aggravated amount of crime should be discussed.In order to ensure the scientificity and rationality of sentencing, the author thinks that the cumulative amount should be taken as the premise and different situations should be distinguished, and the "whole accomplished theory" and "whole attempt theory" should be comprehensively applied to the situation of "partially accomplished part attempted".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉明祥;論搶劫罪的加重犯[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期

2 王志祥;;數(shù)額加重犯基本問(wèn)題研究[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年04期

3 王飛躍;;論一罪累計(jì)數(shù)量處罰制度的合理性[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年04期

4 張正新;金澤剛;;論刑法中的多次犯罪[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年07期

5 劉之雄;數(shù)額犯若干問(wèn)題新探[J];法商研究;2005年06期

6 王志祥;;結(jié)果加重犯的未遂問(wèn)題新論[J];法商研究;2007年03期

7 楊子良;盜竊罪若干新型問(wèn)題研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2005年01期

8 趙廷光;論定罪、法定刑與量刑[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1995年01期

9 薛進(jìn)展;論財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪未遂的定罪處罰[J];法學(xué);2003年09期

10 周光權(quán);偷竊“天價(jià)”科研試驗(yàn)品行為的定性[J];法學(xué);2004年09期

本文編號(hào)：1768861