本文選題：交通肇事罪 + 立法概述　； 參考：《西北大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)水平的不斷提高,交通運(yùn)輸業(yè)也迅速發(fā)展,全國各地交通肇事案件呈逐年上升的趨勢(shì),引起了社會(huì)的廣泛關(guān)注。本文以交通肇事罪為基本研究對(duì)象,在刑法基本原理與交通肇事案件中遇到的實(shí)際問題基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)一些司法實(shí)踐中的處理難題進(jìn)行了分析和探討,并力求在現(xiàn)有研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上提出一些合理性的立法建議,以豐富我國交通肇事類犯罪處理體系。 本文共分為四部分。 第一部分是交通肇事罪的概念及立法沿革。主要介紹了交通肇事罪的概念及1979刑法后我國交通肇事罪在立法、司法解釋上的變化。筆者認(rèn)為交通肇事罪應(yīng)結(jié)合刑法典133條定義為,行為人實(shí)施了違反我國交通運(yùn)輸管理法規(guī)的行為,造成被害人重傷、死亡或者公私財(cái)產(chǎn)因交通事故遭受重大損失的法定危害結(jié)果才構(gòu)成交通肇事罪。 第二部分主要論述了交通肇事罪在刑事立法及司法解釋上的缺陷,提出“法定刑偏輕”“以交通肇事罪共犯論處”、“賠償能力高低影響定罪”“刑罰種類單一”“逃逸行為是量刑情節(jié)還是定罪情節(jié)規(guī)定有爭議”五方面的不足。 第三部分剖析了域外交通肇事罪立法概述并分析了域外交通肇事罪的立法特點(diǎn)對(duì)照我國立法現(xiàn)狀,認(rèn)為域外立法起步早相對(duì)完備,對(duì)我國現(xiàn)行刑法中關(guān)于交通肇事犯罪立法有一定的借鑒意義。 第四部分結(jié)合我國交通肇事罪的立法不足,參照國外立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),通過前部分的深入分析并結(jié)合我國國情,提出提高量刑幅度、細(xì)化罪名將交通肇事逃逸單獨(dú)定罪、廢除以賠償能力為定罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的規(guī)定、擴(kuò)大交通肇事罪的刑罰種類、完善刑事和解制度的建議。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the continuous improvement of the economic level, the transportation industry has also developed rapidly. The traffic accident cases in various parts of the country are on the rise year by year, which has aroused the widespread concern of the society.Based on the basic principles of criminal law and the practical problems encountered in traffic accident cases, this paper analyzes and discusses some difficult problems in judicial practice.On the basis of the existing research results, the author tries to put forward some reasonable legislative suggestions in order to enrich the handling system of traffic accident crimes in China.This paper is divided into four parts.The first part is the concept and legislative evolution of traffic accident crime.This paper mainly introduces the concept of traffic accident crime and the change of legislation and judicial interpretation of traffic accident crime after 1979 criminal law.The author thinks that the crime of causing traffic accident should be defined by 133 article of the Criminal Code, which means that the perpetrator carried out the act of violating the regulations of traffic and transportation management of our country and caused serious injury to the victim.Death or public-private property as a result of serious losses due to traffic accidents legal consequences constitute traffic accident crime.The second part mainly discusses the defects of the traffic accident crime in the criminal legislation and judicial interpretation, and puts forward that "the legal penalty is too light" and "the traffic accident crime accomplice is to be punished".The deficiency of "compensation capacity" affects five aspects: conviction, "single penalty category", whether the circumstances of sentencing or the circumstances of conviction are controversial.The third part analyzes the legislative summary of the extraterritorial traffic accident crime and analyzes the legislative characteristics of the extraterritorial traffic accident crime compared with the current situation of legislation in our country, and thinks that the extraterritorial legislation starts relatively early and is relatively complete.It has certain reference significance to the legislation of traffic accident crime in the current criminal law of our country.The fourth part combines our country traffic accident crime legislation insufficiency, consults the foreign legislation experience, through the first part thorough analysis and the union our country national condition, proposed to raise the sentencing range, the fine charge will traffic accident escape alone conviction,The suggestion of perfecting the system of criminal reconciliation is to abolish the provision of compensation capacity as the standard of conviction, to enlarge the penalty category of traffic accident crime and to perfect the criminal reconciliation system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃國盛;;淺議交通肇事后逃逸與交通肇事罪[J];福建法學(xué);2010年04期

2 王俊平;論交通肇事不救助的問題[J];法學(xué);2000年01期

3 劉源;楊誠;;交通肇事罪共犯問題辨析[J];法學(xué);2012年04期

4 莊衛(wèi)平;;英美刑法與中國刑法之交通肇事罪的比較分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年33期

5 熊文超;;對(duì)交通肇事罪中幾個(gè)問題的分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年13期

6 黃河;論交通肇事罪主體——實(shí)然與應(yīng)然的差距、彌合及應(yīng)用[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

7 勞東燕;;交通肇事逃逸的相關(guān)問題研究[J];法學(xué);2013年06期

8 吳恬;;賠償能力高低與交通肇事罪成立的關(guān)系——由最高人民法院司法解釋的規(guī)定所引出理論上的看法[J];學(xué)理論;2010年04期

9 郭松s，

本文編號(hào)：1765303