本文選題：非法占有目的 + 盜竊罪��； 參考：《新疆大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：非法占有為目的作為大部分取得型財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪、經(jīng)濟(jì)類犯罪中行為人所欲追求的目的，它在一定程度上有助于區(qū)分罪與非罪、此罪與彼罪，所以對這一概念的正確理解和把握是非常重要的。然而，對這一概念的認(rèn)定，國內(nèi)外的刑法學(xué)界存在著諸多爭議。在司法實(shí)踐中對非法占有目的的認(rèn)定也存在著諸多困惑與分歧。本文試結(jié)合具體的案例，借鑒國內(nèi)外刑法學(xué)界對這一問題的研究成果，闡述了自己對非法占有目的含義的理解，并指出了非法占有目的在立法和司法中的不足，對這一制度在立法上和司法上的完善以及認(rèn)定提出了自己的看法，以期對非法占有為目的的認(rèn)定有所裨益。 全文共分四個(gè)部分進(jìn)行論述。 第一部分：從具體案例入手，簡要概述了被告人盜竊車輛的行為，車輛雖然登記在被告人的名下，但因?yàn)榈謧鶇f(xié)議已經(jīng)交付于原告；接著就案例定性時(shí)，控方、辯方以及法院對盜竊罪有無存在的爭議和問題加以闡述，并引出了爭議的焦點(diǎn)即“非法占有”目的的認(rèn)定，為下文的展開做了鋪墊； 第二部分：從第一部分引出了本文要討論的問題：盜竊罪中的“非法占有”目的。之所以出現(xiàn)上述爭議主要在于對“非法占有”目的的認(rèn)定存在分歧。該部分從比較法的角度，就刑法上的“非法占有”與相近概念：民法上的“占有”與“所有”、刑法上的“占有”與民法上的“占有”等加以比較辨析，明確了刑法上“非法占有”目的的含義，并就本文所涉案例中被告是否具有非法占有目的進(jìn)行了論證； 第三部分：主要從比較法的角度，就國內(nèi)外關(guān)于“非法占有”目的的學(xué)說進(jìn)行了歸納比較，主要包括“排除權(quán)利者意思說”、“利用處分的意思說”、“折衷說”、“不誠實(shí)永久剝奪說”以及“意圖占有說”、“非法獲利說”以及“意圖改變所有權(quán)說”、“不法（非法）所有說”，并對各觀點(diǎn)的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)加以評(píng)析，以期對刑法上的“非法占有”目的給出規(guī)范含義； 第四部分:將本文所涉案例與理論相結(jié)合，從司法實(shí)踐的角度，闡述了非法占有目的在立法和司法中存在的問題，及其對盜竊罪等取得型財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪認(rèn)定的影響，并對“非法占有”目的在立法上的界定與司法上認(rèn)定提出了自己的看法，進(jìn)而結(jié)合相關(guān)理論對案例進(jìn)行了評(píng)析。
[Abstract]:The purpose of illegal possession, as a crime of obtaining most property, is the purpose that the perpetrator wants to pursue in the economic crime. To a certain extent, it helps to distinguish the crime from the non-crime, which is the crime and the other crime.So the correct understanding and grasp of this concept is very important.However, the definition of this concept, there are many disputes in the field of criminal law at home and abroad.In judicial practice, there are many puzzles and divergences on the purpose of illegal possession.This article tries to combine the concrete case, draws lessons from the domestic and foreign criminal law circles to this question research result, elaborated own to the illegal possession goal meaning understanding, and pointed out the illegal possession purpose in the legislation and the judicature insufficiency,The author puts forward his own views on the perfection and confirmation of this system in legislation and judicature in order to benefit the recognition of illegal possession.This paper is divided into four parts.The first part: starting from the specific case, briefly outlines the defendant's theft of the vehicle, although the vehicle is registered in the defendant's name, but because the debt settlement agreement has been delivered to the plaintiff; then, in the case of qualitative, the prosecution,The defense and the court expound the disputes and problems about the existence of the crime of larceny, and draw the focus of the dispute, that is, the purpose of "illegal possession", which paves the way for the development of the following;The second part: from the first part leads to the problem discussed in this paper: the purpose of "illegal possession" in the crime of larceny.The reason why the dispute mainly lies in the "illegal possession" of the purpose of the existence of differences.From the angle of comparative law, this part compares the concepts of "illegal possession" and "possession" in criminal law: "possession" and "possession" in civil law, "possession" in criminal law and "possession" in civil law.It clarifies the meaning of "illegal possession" in criminal law, and proves whether the defendant has the purpose of illegal possession in the case in question.The third part: mainly from the angle of comparative law, the author summarizes and compares the theories about the purpose of "illegal possession" at home and abroad, mainly including "the meaning of excluding the right", "the meaning of using punishment", "the compromise theory"."dishonest permanent deprivation" and "intention to possess", "illegal profit" and "intention to change ownership", "illegal (illegal) ownership", and to assess the merits and demerits of each point of view,With a view to the criminal law of "illegal possession" purpose to give the normative meaning;The fourth part: combine the case and theory of this article, from the angle of judicial practice, expound the problems existing in the legislation and judicature of the purpose of illegal possession, and its influence on the crime of obtaining property, such as theft, etc.The author puts forward his own views on the legislative definition and judicial confirmation of the purpose of "illegal possession", and then evaluates the case with the relevant theories.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.35

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳學(xué)斌,俞娟;論我國刑法中的“以非法占有為目的”[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2005年02期

2 張明楷;論財(cái)產(chǎn)罪的非法占有目的[J];法商研究;2005年05期

3 肖中華;張少林;;刑事推定與犯罪認(rèn)定芻議[J];法學(xué)家;2002年03期

4 劉進(jìn);刑法“非法占有目的”論[J];桂林師范高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào)(綜合版);2002年01期

5 陳興良;目的犯的法理探究[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年03期

6 孫國祥;;非法占有目的芻議[J];南京大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2001年01期

7 吳貴森;;非法占有目的法律地位探究[J];中國刑事法雜志;2005年06期

8 鐘朝陽;;美國證據(jù)法中的刑事推定——兼談我國刑事推定中存在的問題[J];中國刑事法雜志;2008年06期

9 何家弘;論司法證明中的推定[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

10 李洪川;論目的犯的目的本質(zhì)[J];中國青年政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1764919