本文選題：組織賣淫罪　切入點：容留賣淫罪　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文沒有以傳統(tǒng)犯罪構(gòu)成作為研究路徑，而是立足于司法實踐中的判決，從實踐中的判決文書反思理論的困境。以司法實務(wù)中的典型問題為眼，展開關(guān)于各罪界限的辨析。 文章的開篇從淫業(yè)犯罪的核心——賣淫說起，從“巫娼”到“官妓”，從一夜關(guān)閉所有妓院的“北京方式”到如今的“東莞模式”，這一行業(yè)的發(fā)展也投射了國家的變遷。新中國成立之初，國家即對賣淫嫖娼進行規(guī)制，，經(jīng)過全國關(guān)閉妓院運動，無形中埋下這樣的伏筆：社會主義國家和賣淫嫖娼是不兼容的。但是，隨著改革開放，“一舉禁娼成功”的客觀條件發(fā)生根本變化。從最初組織賣淫罪的空白，到后來以組織賣淫罪為核心的淫業(yè)犯罪立法體系的建立，從《關(guān)于嚴禁賣淫嫖娼的決定》，到1992年兩高發(fā)布的《解答》，淫業(yè)犯罪的規(guī)定略顯零亂、陳舊。 文章的第二部分，主要圍繞組織賣淫罪與容留賣淫罪的關(guān)系討論。刑法對于這兩個罪名都采取了簡單罪狀的方式，導(dǎo)致淫業(yè)犯罪兩大核心罪名定義權(quán)的旁落。因為容留賣淫罪對場所的要求，所以在探究組織賣淫罪與容留賣淫罪時，只是針對有場所前提下的組織賣淫罪。在劃定兩罪界限時，需結(jié)合三個方面進行分析，其一，場所規(guī)模的大小；其二，涉案人員的數(shù)量；其三，管理制度的嚴密性。 文章的第三部分圍繞著組織賣淫罪與協(xié)助組織賣淫罪的關(guān)系探析。由刑法第361條的規(guī)定可知，協(xié)助組織賣淫行為獨立成罪是最高院在確定罪名時的一個“失誤”。協(xié)助組織賣淫行為是組織賣淫罪的一種類型，并不應(yīng)該獨立成罪。協(xié)助組織賣淫行為的實質(zhì)是組織賣淫罪的共犯。在關(guān)于協(xié)助組織賣淫罪的司法解釋中，對協(xié)助角色進行了列舉，比如保鏢、打手、管賬人等，卻唯獨沒有說明組織賣淫活動中一個至關(guān)重要的角色——“媽咪”。此處的“媽咪”有一定的局限，她最大的職能是對賣淫人員的管理，如果她突破“媽咪”的權(quán)限，對整個組織賣淫活動進行控制，那么她的角色也已經(jīng)發(fā)生了轉(zhuǎn)變。 文章的第四部分就組織賣淫罪與強迫賣淫罪的關(guān)系進行闡述，同樣是司法解釋的存在，導(dǎo)致了兩罪的爭議。已經(jīng)失效的92年《解答》定義組織賣淫罪為以招聘、雇傭、強迫、引誘、容留等手段，控制多人從事賣淫的行為。如此一來，強迫行為獨立成罪的意義何在？其實，就組織賣淫而言，組織賣淫罪中手段行為可以評價強迫手段的暴力，而且不受暴力程度的限制。 文章第五部分針對五個加重情節(jié)中存在的問題一一論述。首先，第（二）項至第（五）項同樣適用于組織賣淫罪，原因在于組織賣淫罪的手段包括暴力。其次，“強奸后迫使賣淫的”——強迫是出于迫使賣淫的目的，兩者存在順承關(guān)系。再次，“強迫不滿十四周歲的幼女賣淫的”應(yīng)當采取嚴格責(zé)任，既然行為人對自己在實施強迫、組織賣淫違法行為是明知的，那么就不需要對所有事實要素都明知。最后，司法實踐在認定賣淫情節(jié)時，應(yīng)放棄對賣淫次數(shù)事實認定的評價。 作為文章的結(jié)尾，是筆者對組織賣淫犯罪的一點設(shè)想。有老師曾說：“現(xiàn)在的學(xué)生太狂妄了，批了一頓立法者，再批一頓其他刑法學(xué)者，最后給點自己的所謂立法建議。想的和寫的，都太簡單了�！惫P者雖想“復(fù)雜一點”，又深感能力有限，便只能談?wù)勛约涸谘芯拷M織賣淫犯罪一年有余的一點設(shè)想。其一，將強迫賣淫罪從刑法第358條移出，廢除協(xié)助組織賣淫罪。其二，降低組織賣淫罪法定刑設(shè)置，廢除組織賣淫罪死刑。歷史原因?qū)е铝恕吧鐣髁x與賣淫嫖娼格格不入”的思想，但是賣淫嫖娼在現(xiàn)實社會大量存在并難以消除的情況也不可忽視。中國社會不可能廢除關(guān)于淫業(yè)犯罪的立法規(guī)制，但是現(xiàn)有的可處死刑的法定刑顯然也不科學(xué)。
[Abstract]:This article does not take the traditional crime constitution as the research path, but is based on the judicial practice judgment, from the practice judgment document to reflect the theory difficult position. Take the judicial practice typical question as the eye, launches the analysis about each crime boundary.
This paper starts from the core of prostitution crime, prostitution to start, from the "witch prostitution" to "who", from the night closed all brothels "Beijing mode" to the "Dongguan model", the development of this industry is also projected to state changes. The new Chinese was first established, namely the regulation of the country prostitution, after the closure of the brothel movement, virtually buried the foreshadowing: socialist countries and prostitution are incompatible. However, with the reform and opening up, the objective conditions of the prohibition of prostitution has successfully "changed from the initial blank. Prostitution crime organization, set up later to organized prostitution as the core the prostitution crime legislation system, from the prohibition of prostitution" decided >, < > to answer the 1992 high release of the provisions of prostitution crime slightly messy, old.
The second part of the article, mainly focus on the discussion of the relationship of crime and prostitution prostitution crime. Criminal law for the two charges have taken a simple description, resulting in prostitution crime two core accusation definition right sidelined. Because the crime of harboring prostitution of facilities, so on the crime of organizing prostitution and prostitution crime when only in places under the premise of the crime of organizing prostitution. In two designated crime limit, should be combined with the three aspects of analysis, first, the size of the place; second, number of people involved; thirdly, strict management system.
The third part of the article around on the relationship between the crime of organizing prostitution and assisting in the organization of prostitution. The provisions of article 361st of the criminal law shows that the independent crime of assisting in the organization of prostitution behavior of the Supreme People's court is a "mistake" in determining the charges. Assist in the organization of prostitution behavior is a type of organized prostitution, should not be independent the crime of assisting in the organization of prostitution behavior. The essence is the accomplice of the crime of organizing prostitution. On assisting the organization of prostitution crime judicial interpretation, to assist the role of the list, such as bodyguards, thugs, bookkeeper, but did not explain the organization sell a crucial role in prostitution, "mommy" here ". Mum has some limitations, her biggest function is to prostitution personnel management, if she breaks the" Mummy "permissions on the prostitution control, so her role has occurred The change.
The fourth part is the crime of organizing prostitution and forced prostitution relations were discussed, the same is the judicial interpretation of the existence, leading to two crimes controversy. 92 years have failed to answer < > define the crime of organizing prostitution in recruitment, employment, compulsion, seduce, shelter and other means of control, many people engaged in prostitution behavior so, where is the significance of compulsive behavior independent crime? In fact, is the organization of prostitution, prostitution means crime can evaluate coercion and violence, and is not affected by the level of violence.
In the fifth part of the five aggravating circumstances in the problems discussed. First, the (two) to (five) similarly applicable to the crime of organizing prostitution, the reason lies in the crime of organizing prostitution means including violence. Secondly, "rape forced prostitution, forced forced prostitution is on purpose there are the relationship. Once again," fourteen years of dissatisfaction forced prostitution of young girls should take strict liability, since they act on their own in the implementation of forced prostitution, illegal behavior is knowing, you don't need to have all the facts to know. Finally, the judicial practice in the identification of prostitution plot, should give up the number of facts. The evaluation of prostitution
As the end of the article, is the author of a little prostitution crime. The teacher said: "now the students are too arrogant, a legislator, and a group of other scholars, finally to the point of their so-called legislative proposals. Think and write, are too simple." although I think "more complex", but more limited capacity, some ideas will only talk about their research in the organization of prostitution crime more than a year. On the one hand, the forced prostitution from article 358th of the criminal law is removed, the abolition of assisting in the organization of prostitution. Second, reduce the crime of organizing prostitution legal punishment, the abolition of prostitution the death penalty for the crime. The historical causes of "socialism and prostitution misfits" thought, but in reality there are a lot of prostitution and difficult to eliminate the situation can not be ignored. China society may abolish the legislation on prostitution crime, but It is clear that the existing legal punishment for the death penalty is unscientific.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周治成;;論協(xié)助組織賣淫罪中的“招募”和“運送”[J];法制與社會;2013年09期

2 鄭蘭先,董樂先;協(xié)助組織賣淫不宜單獨定罪[J];人民檢察;2004年02期

3 王永革;董芳芳;;刑法修正案(八)對協(xié)助組織賣淫罪的細化的分析——兼談其對審查逮捕工作的影響[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬刊);2011年06期

4 吳揚傳;;收集、提供大量嫖客信息的行為定性[J];人民司法;2013年02期

5 茹士春;;論幫助行為單獨定罪——以協(xié)助組織賣淫罪與組織賣淫罪的切分為例[J];中國刑事法雜志;2011年01期

6 麥小咚;雪潔;;從癡情女到賣淫團伙“女掌門”——全國最大發(fā)卡招嫖案紀實[J];法律與生活;2012年07期

7 呂奕成;;組織賣淫罪與協(xié)助組織賣淫罪、容留賣淫罪的界分——從一起組織賣淫案談起[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年05期

8 周海洋;;賣淫相關(guān)犯罪探究[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年05期

9 鄭偉;;就這樣動搖了共同犯罪的根基——論組織賣淫罪與協(xié)助組織賣淫罪的怪異切分[J];法學(xué);2009年12期

10 禹艷輝;;組織賣淫罪和容留、介紹賣淫罪之區(qū)別研究[J];法制與社會;2011年22期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前4條

1 本報記者 徐偉 本報通訊員 程斌;重慶一賣淫集團制訂應(yīng)急預(yù)案躲避打擊[N];法制日報;2012年

2 通訊員 郭愛軍　張龍鋒;幫助控制管理賣淫女并協(xié)助組織賣淫被追捕[N];菏澤日報;2009年

3 記者 李松 黃潔 通訊員 雪潔;國內(nèi)最大卡片招嫖團伙34名成員獲刑[N];法制日報;2012年

4 張希才 王水祥 雷明中;以外出游玩為名誘騙學(xué)生賣淫[N];法制生活報;2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 劉璐;協(xié)助組織賣淫罪疑難問題探究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

2 李明晶;介紹賣淫罪的理解和適用[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

3 王虹;論組織賣淫罪中“組織”的認定[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年

4 金亞萍;組織賣淫罪疑難問題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

5 王嬌;介紹賣淫罪若干疑難問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

本文編號：1727617