發(fā)布時間：2018-04-06 22:05

  本文選題：共同犯罪　切入點：意思聯(lián)絡　出處：《法學評論》2017年02期

【摘要】：在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)共同犯罪中存在意思聯(lián)絡難以認定的情況。就域外否定意思聯(lián)絡的片面共同犯罪理論而言,是否以及多大程度上承認片面共同犯罪與區(qū)分式參加體系和統(tǒng)一正犯人體系的立法及理論選擇有關。我國采取的是"整體認定犯罪、個別分配責任"的獨立模式,意思聯(lián)絡是不可放棄的立法立場,對于秘密支持可以處以他人預備的刑罰�；ヂ�(lián)網(wǎng)時代的意思聯(lián)絡具有特殊性,可以利用"針對共同性的未必故意"和"通過符號語言的意思聯(lián)絡"實現(xiàn)意思聯(lián)絡的緩和,并通過入罪門檻的個別考察限制處罰范圍。
[Abstract]:In Internet joint crime, there is a situation where it is difficult to identify meaning liaison.As far as the theory of unilateral joint crime with negative meaning is concerned, whether and to what extent the theory of unilateral joint crime is related to the legislative and theoretical choice of the differentiated participation system and the unified criminal system.Our country adopts the independent mode of "recognizing the crime as a whole and distributing the responsibility individually", meaning contact is the legislative stand that cannot be abandoned, and the penalty for secret support can be imposed by others.In the Internet era, the meaning liaison has its particularity. It can realize the relaxation of the meaning contact by "not intentionally aiming at the commonality" and "through the symbolic language", and limit the scope of punishment through the individual investigation of the threshold of incrimination.
【作者單位】： 清華大學法學院;
【分類號】：D924.1

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 左建華;;片面正犯肯定論[J];長沙鐵道學院學報(社會科學版);2007年04期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號：1719091