發(fā)布時間：2018-04-05 09:13

  本文選題：暴力行為　切入點：刑法功能　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：暴力行為的發(fā)生作為一種普遍社會現(xiàn)象，不僅是社會學(xué)研究的內(nèi)容，更是與刑法學(xué)關(guān)系密切。暴力行為相較一般行為往往具有強(qiáng)制性、脅迫性，對于社會造成的危害性大，不僅被社會輿論道德否定，，更上升到刑事法律打擊的層面。暴力行為表現(xiàn)形式多樣和復(fù)雜，造成了刑法理論以及司法實踐上對于暴力行為的規(guī)制存在一定的混亂。表現(xiàn)為：刑法理論上沒有對暴力行為的概念進(jìn)行明確，造成了相似概念之間的混淆；刑法理論缺乏對暴力行為的系統(tǒng)研究以及同域外刑法的對比研究；暴力行為的擬制規(guī)定導(dǎo)致適用上違背了量刑均衡原則；對造成輕微傷的故意傷害行為入罪困難；新型暴力行為的立法存在不足；司法實踐中存在對暴力行為的重復(fù)評價。鑒于此，對刑法中的暴力行為研究不僅是必要的而且是亟需的。 對刑法中暴力行為的界定成為本文的邏輯起點，在此基礎(chǔ)上，明確暴力行為在刑法上的地位是本文的價值追求，對暴力行為的立法和司法的考察是本文的理論與實踐的結(jié)合點，最終明晰暴力行為之間的界限，發(fā)揮其對罪與非罪、此罪與彼罪的指導(dǎo)作用。全文共分為五個部分： 第一個部分對刑法中的暴力行為進(jìn)行了基本界定。分析了廣義的暴力行為與我國刑法中的暴力行為，明確了刑法中暴力行為的涵義。同時，將暴力行為同脅迫行為、其他手段、暴力犯罪進(jìn)行界分，避免相似概念之間的混同。 第二個部分闡述了暴力行為入刑的價值，是對刑法中暴力行為進(jìn)行理論梳理和司法實踐探討的根基。本部分從立法、司法兩個方面闡述其入刑價值，具體從功能、目的、定罪、量刑四個維度進(jìn)行深度挖掘。解決的是刑法為什么要規(guī)制暴力行為，以及規(guī)制暴力行為的意義所在。 第三個部分對暴力行為進(jìn)行了立法考察，包括立法現(xiàn)狀和立法問題兩個部分。首先，分別介紹了英美法系和大陸法系中代表性的國家對于暴力行為的規(guī)制情況，主要考察了不同于我國刑法中暴力行為規(guī)制情況的條文。其次，從暴力行為的分類以及特點上分析了我國刑法關(guān)于暴力行為的規(guī)制現(xiàn)狀。最后，對我國立法中暴力行為的擬制規(guī)定，造成輕微傷的故意傷害行為的入罪標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，以及新型暴力行為的立法規(guī)制的合理性分別進(jìn)行了探討。 第四個部分對暴力行為進(jìn)行了司法考察。本部分僅針對我國的司法現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行闡述，指出了我國實踐中存在對暴力行為重復(fù)評價的問題。通過強(qiáng)奸罪、搶劫罪代表性案例的分析，對先強(qiáng)奸后取財行為的處理現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行總結(jié)。具體分析了對暴力行為重復(fù)評價的問題的不合理之處。 第五個部分對暴力行為進(jìn)行了規(guī)范完善構(gòu)想。包括立法完善、司法完善兩個方面。針對暴力行為的擬制規(guī)定、故意傷害行為入罪、新型暴力行為規(guī)制三個方面進(jìn)行法條和司法解釋上的完善。司法實踐中對暴力行為重復(fù)評價問題通過指導(dǎo)性案例予以完善。
[Abstract]:As a universal social phenomenon, the occurrence of violence is not only the content of sociological research, but also closely related to criminal law.Compared with the general behavior, violence is often mandatory and coercive, which causes great harm to the society. It is not only negated by public opinion and morality, but also rises to the level of criminal law.The various and complex forms of violent acts result in confusion in the regulation of violent acts in criminal law theory and judicial practice.The results are as follows: the concept of violence is not clearly defined in the theory of criminal law, which causes confusion between similar concepts, the theory of criminal law lacks systematic research on violence and the comparative study with foreign criminal law;The fictitious provisions of violent acts lead to the violation of the principle of balance of sentencing in application; the difficulty of criminalizing intentional injury caused by minor injuries; the insufficiency of legislation on new types of violence; and the repeated evaluation of violent acts in judicial practice.In view of this, the study of violence in criminal law is not only necessary but also urgent.The definition of violence in criminal law has become the logical starting point of this paper. On this basis, it is the value pursuit of this article to make clear the status of violence in criminal law. The study of legislation and judicature on violence is the combination of theory and practice.Finally, it clarifies the boundary between violence and exerts its guiding role to crime and non-crime.The full text is divided into five parts:The first part defines the violence in criminal law.This paper analyzes the generalized violence and the violence in the criminal law of our country, and clarifies the meaning of the violent act in the criminal law.At the same time, violence and coercion, other means, violent crime, to avoid the confusion between similar concepts.The second part expounds the value of violence in criminal law, which is the foundation of theoretical analysis and judicial practice of violence in criminal law.This part expounds the value of criminal law from two aspects of legislation and judicature, specifically from the four dimensions of function, purpose, conviction and sentencing.The solution is why the criminal law should regulate the violent behavior and the significance of regulating the violent behavior.The third part investigates the legislation of violence, including the current situation of legislation and legislative issues.First of all, it introduces the regulation of violence in the representative countries of Anglo-American law system and civil law system respectively, and mainly investigates the provisions which are different from the criminal law of our country in the regulation of violent acts.Secondly, it analyzes the current situation of the regulation of violence in criminal law of our country from the classification and characteristics of violence.Finally, the author discusses the fictitious provisions of violence in our legislation, the standard of intentional injury caused by slight injury, and the rationality of the legislative regulation of new type of violence.The fourth part carries on the judicial investigation to the violence.This part only expounds the current situation of our country's judicature, and points out the problem of repeated evaluation of violence in our country's practice.Through the analysis of the representative cases of rape and robbery, this paper summarizes the present situation of dealing with the behavior of rape and then taking money.The irrationality of repeated evaluation of violence is analyzed in detail.The fifth part has carried on the norm consummation idea to the violent behavior.It includes two aspects: legislative perfection and judicial perfection.In view of the fictitious regulation of violence, the crime of intentional injury and the regulation of new type of violence, three aspects of law and judicial interpretation are improved.The repeated evaluation of violence in judicial practice is perfected by instructive cases.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李潔;定罪量刑情節(jié)若干問題研究[J];北華大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2001年01期

2 陳世偉;;“刑法中的行為”研究新視野[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2008年02期

3 田宏杰;;故意傷害罪若干疑難問題探討[J];法學(xué)家;2001年04期

4 王永興;;暴力犯罪:一個概念的解讀[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年05期

5 李玫瑾,屈明;反社會人格引發(fā)的嚴(yán)重暴力犯罪——對張君犯罪心理的剖析[J];河南公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報;2002年01期

6 張陽;;論“暴力”的刑法學(xué)考量[J];河南社會科學(xué);2008年05期

7 劉明祥;;傷害罪若干問題探究[J];江海學(xué)刊;2007年03期

8 武卉昕;暴力的道德依據(jù)是否存在——古謝伊諾夫非暴力倫理觀管窺[J];求索;2005年05期

9 范德繁;;論我國刑法中暴力行為的特征[J];人民檢察;2007年11期

10 張明楷;;故意傷害罪司法現(xiàn)狀的刑法學(xué)分析[J];清華法學(xué);2013年01期

本文編號：1714122