本文選題：犯罪論　切入點(diǎn)：體系　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：犯罪論體系在刑法理論和實(shí)踐中均具有重要意義。犯罪論體系不僅具有重要的體系價(jià)值,而且能夠?qū)π谭☉?yīng)用中具體問題的解決提供標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化的指導(dǎo)。犯罪論體系作為刑法理論體系的核心內(nèi)容,歷來有“刑法理論體系王冠上的寶石”之美譽(yù)。犯罪論體系主要有兩大體系:一是德日三階層的犯罪論體系,先后經(jīng)歷了古典、新古典、目的論、新古典與目的論的結(jié)合、功能性等研究學(xué)派的發(fā)展歷程,其核心價(jià)值即犯罪是對構(gòu)成要件符合性、違法性、有責(zé)性的判斷;二是英美的雙層次模式,即實(shí)體要件和犯罪成立條件,主要探究事實(shí)原因和法律原因的互相關(guān)系。通過對比兩大體系可以看出,德日犯罪論體系理論功底深邃,結(jié)構(gòu)復(fù)雜宏大,成為日后大陸法犯罪學(xué)體系研究的理論基石,英美犯罪論體系主要注重經(jīng)驗(yàn)和程序操作,在理論研究上相對欠缺,結(jié)構(gòu)單薄,核心在于程序正義和人權(quán)保障。兩大法系既有區(qū)別,又有相通之處。兩大法系犯罪論體系幾百年的發(fā)展也給我們許多有益的啟示。我國幾十年的刑法實(shí)踐和研究,均沿襲前蘇聯(lián)的四要件說。隨著時(shí)代的發(fā)展,這種體系已經(jīng)暴露出種種弊端,為了能夠構(gòu)建更加符合我國國情、更加符合法律內(nèi)在屬性的犯罪倫體系,我國刑法學(xué)界專家一直在作努力的研究。學(xué)界先后出現(xiàn)了引進(jìn)論和改造論等各種意見。為了實(shí)現(xiàn)依法治國的目標(biāo),我們要在學(xué)習(xí)和借鑒西方兩種理論的基礎(chǔ)上,認(rèn)真提升我國犯罪論體系的深度和厚度,探索出真正適應(yīng)我國社會狀況的的犯罪論體系。
[Abstract]:The system of crime theory is of great significance in the theory and practice of criminal law. Moreover, it can provide standardized guidance for the solution of specific problems in the application of criminal law. The criminal theory system is the core content of the criminal law theory system. The criminal theory system has two major systems: one is the crime theory system of Germany and Japan, which has experienced the combination of classical, neoclassical, teleological, neo-classical and teleological. The core value of crime is the judgment of conformance, illegality and responsibility to the constitutive elements, and the two-tier mode of Anglo-American, that is, the substantive elements and the conditions for the establishment of the crime, is the development course of the school of functional research. By comparing the two systems, we can see that Germany and Japan have a profound theoretical foundation and a complex structure, which has become the theoretical cornerstone of the future study of the criminal system of continental law. The Anglo-American system of crime mainly pays attention to experience and procedure operation, lacking in theoretical research, weak structure, and its core lies in procedural justice and human rights protection. There are differences between the two legal systems. There are also similarities. The development of the criminal theory system of the two major legal systems over the past several hundred years has also given us a lot of useful enlightenment. Our country's criminal law practice and research for several decades have all followed the four elements theory of the former Soviet Union. With the development of the times, This system has exposed a variety of shortcomings, in order to be able to build more in line with China's national conditions, more in line with the inherent attributes of the law of the crime system, In order to realize the goal of governing the country according to law, we should study and learn from the western two kinds of theories. In order to improve the depth and thickness of China's crime-theory system, the author explores a criminological system that can really adapt to the social conditions of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D914

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 姜金良;韓凱;;環(huán)境污染犯罪雙層次因果關(guān)系理論的構(gòu)建[J];中國環(huán)境管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年03期

2 婁永濤;;規(guī)制司法裁量權(quán)的理念與路徑——由重構(gòu)量刑活動規(guī)則談起[J];石河子大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2014年03期

3 張金玉;;暴力犯罪案件中被害人過錯的認(rèn)定[J];中國刑事法雜志;2014年04期

4 魏漢濤;;被迫行為的性質(zhì)及其適用條件[J];刑事法判解;2013年01期

5 李波;;行為人刑法轉(zhuǎn)型與當(dāng)代中國的選擇[J];政法論叢;2015年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 吳曉霏;法人犯罪刑事責(zé)任研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

2 楊明芳;英國刑法一般辯護(hù)事由研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 李宜航;論被害人過錯對量刑的影響[D];沈陽師范大學(xué);2014年

2 朱省偉;論刑事責(zé)任中的被害人過錯[D];蘇州大學(xué);2014年

3 趙志福;從罪因多元論看傳統(tǒng)罪責(zé)理論[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2014年

4 魯書;論我國未成年人前科消滅制度之構(gòu)建[D];安徽財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

5 李鶴群;論刑法上的激情犯罪[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2015年

6 劉瑛琦;對《刑法》第三十條立法解釋的反思[D];吉林大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號：1652953