本文選題：刑事詐騙　切入點：民事欺詐　出處：《南昌大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：“欺詐”與“詐騙”，是兩個意義相近卻又各不相同的詞語，這兩個原本難分彼此的概念隨著現(xiàn)代市場經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展與法律制度的完善，各自具有了自己的歸屬，在日常生活中，欺詐偏向了民事法律領(lǐng)域，而詐騙則被納入了刑事法律的調(diào)整范圍，這種分化形成了兩種新的概念——民事欺詐與刑事詐騙。無論是刑事詐騙還是民事欺詐其目的都是通過虛構(gòu)事實，采用欺騙的手段，從而騙取他人的錢財，這兩種行為都損害了市場的公平交易和誠實信用，使被害一方遭受經(jīng)濟損失。為了整頓市場經(jīng)濟秩序活動，保障社會經(jīng)濟安全，刑事詐騙和民事欺詐無一例外的被列為了法律的重點調(diào)整對象。 刑事詐騙和民事欺詐有一個共同的關(guān)鍵詞——“欺騙”，這是一個自人類社會誕生之初就一直存在的事物，作為人類社會屬性的一種負面表現(xiàn)形式，“欺騙”行為長期受到社會道德的譴責。如果將“欺騙”行為比作一棵樹的主干，那么刑事詐騙和民事欺詐則是這一主干上的兩條分支，，其生長路線并非完全相同，而在這兩條分支上又各自結(jié)出了果實，形成了繁茂各異的植株。刑事詐騙和民事欺詐在內(nèi)涵和外延上的區(qū)別造就了法律對這兩種行為規(guī)定的差異，而對于當事人來說，一方面由于民事、刑事法律對刑事詐騙和民事欺詐處理方式的不同，致使被害人尋求救濟的途徑有所不同；另一方面隨著法制的進一步完善，對不法行為人權(quán)益的保護也要求將刑事詐騙這種嚴重刑事違法與民事欺詐這類普通民事違法區(qū)別開來。因此，研究刑事詐騙與民事欺詐的涵義，準確把握二者之間的界限，在充分保障各方正當權(quán)益的前提下，打擊違法犯罪，對維護市場秩序，保持經(jīng)濟穩(wěn)定，促進社會主義市場經(jīng)濟健康有序的發(fā)展具有重要的意義。
[Abstract]:"Fraud" and "Fraud" are two words with similar meanings but different meanings. With the development of the modern market economy and the perfection of the legal system, these two concepts have their own ownership in their daily life. Fraud is biased in the field of civil law, and fraud is included in the adjustment of criminal law. This division has formed two new concepts-civil fraud and criminal fraud. Both criminal fraud and civil fraud are designed to defraud other people's money through fictitious facts and deception. Both of these acts have damaged the fair trade and good faith of the market, and caused the injured party to suffer economic losses. In order to rectify the market economic order and ensure social and economic security, Criminal fraud and civil fraud without exception have been listed as the focus of the law. Criminal fraud and civil fraud have a common keyword "deception", a thing that has existed since the beginning of human society. As a negative manifestation of human social attributes, "deception" has long been condemned by social morality. If "deceptive" behavior is compared to the trunk of a tree, criminal fraud and civil fraud are two branches of this trunk. Its growth path is not exactly the same, and the two branches bear fruit and form different and lush plants. The difference in connotation and extension between criminal fraud and civil fraud has resulted in the difference between the two kinds of acts stipulated by law. For the parties concerned, on the one hand, as a result of the difference of civil, criminal law on criminal fraud and civil fraud, the ways for victims to seek redress are different; on the other hand, with the further improvement of the legal system, The protection of the rights and interests of the wrongdoer also requires the distinction between the serious criminal offence of criminal fraud and the ordinary civil law such as civil fraud. Therefore, it is necessary to study the meaning of criminal fraud and civil fraud, and accurately grasp the boundary between the two. On the premise of fully protecting the legitimate rights and interests of all parties, it is of great significance to crack down on illegal crimes and to maintain market order, maintain economic stability and promote the healthy and orderly development of socialist market economy.
【學位授予單位】：南昌大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3;D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 黎全陽;;關(guān)于詐騙罪認定若干爭議問題的探討[J];法學家;1996年02期

2 劉遠;;欺詐犯罪原理探究[J];法學家;2000年05期

3 劉明祥;論詐騙罪中的交付財產(chǎn)行為[J];法學評論;2001年02期

4 陳增寶;詐騙犯罪非法占有目的的認定方法探究[J];人民檢察;2004年06期

5 花克明;“以非法占有為目的”的正確認定[J];人民檢察;1998年08期

6 徐志軍;張傳偉;;欺詐的界分[J];政法論壇;2006年04期

7 董玉庭;論訴訟詐騙及其刑法評價[J];中國法學;2004年02期

本文編號：1638117