本文選題：受賄罪　切入點(diǎn)：量刑情節(jié)　出處：《河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：貪污賄賂犯罪是一個(gè)歷史性、全球性的問題，是當(dāng)今世界各國所共同面臨的嚴(yán)峻挑戰(zhàn)之一。在貪污賄賂罪中，受賄罪的犯罪率占有絕對(duì)比例，并且危害嚴(yán)重，不僅威脅國家政權(quán)的安危，，玷污職務(wù)廉潔性，還嚴(yán)重?cái)_亂社會(huì)秩序和經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境。目前，我國正處于經(jīng)濟(jì)轉(zhuǎn)型和社會(huì)改革時(shí)期，腐敗現(xiàn)象較為嚴(yán)重，大案要案層出不窮，人民對(duì)于腐敗問題深惡痛絕。面對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)的反腐需要與高漲的反腐輿論，我國不論是從體制上還是司法上都加大了反腐力度，中央在部署2013年反腐敗工作要求時(shí)提出要“強(qiáng)化對(duì)權(quán)力運(yùn)行的制約和監(jiān)督”并“推進(jìn)反腐倡廉法規(guī)制度建設(shè)”。在政府的高度重視之下我國的反腐敗工作取得了較大進(jìn)展，但同時(shí)也暴露出許多新的問題。特別是由于受賄罪立法上的缺陷和司法中的疏漏，導(dǎo)致受賄罪的量刑很不規(guī)范，具體表現(xiàn)為一些個(gè)案的量刑失衡問題十分嚴(yán)重。量刑失衡不僅違背罪行相適應(yīng)的刑法基本原則，不能很好地實(shí)現(xiàn)刑罰對(duì)犯罪人的懲罰與教育作用，而且將很大程度上影響法律的權(quán)威性和可預(yù)期性，損害刑法公平正義的基本價(jià)值。 關(guān)于受賄罪的量刑問題，國外一些國家：例如美國和日本，以及中國香港和臺(tái)灣地區(qū)的考察開展時(shí)間比較早并且研究深入，在該領(lǐng)域的研究處于比較先進(jìn)和成熟的階段，既有先進(jìn)的立法模式又積累了豐富的司法判例可供參考，其中有很多有益之處值得我們學(xué)習(xí)。 關(guān)于量刑規(guī)范化問題我國司法機(jī)關(guān)也做出了許多有益的探索。分別由兩高三部和最高人民法院制定的《關(guān)于規(guī)范量刑程序若干問題的意見（試行）》、《人民法院量刑指導(dǎo)意見（試行）》于2010年10月1日起開始在全國法院全面試行。結(jié)合腐敗犯罪的高發(fā)態(tài)勢(shì)和量刑規(guī)范化改革這一背景，本文對(duì)受賄罪的量刑問題進(jìn)行了研究分析。通過簡(jiǎn)介美國和日本以及香港、臺(tái)灣地區(qū)的受賄罪量刑制度，分析我國當(dāng)前受賄罪量刑中存在的一些不規(guī)范問題，從而在實(shí)體立法和程序構(gòu)建等方面提出自己的建議和設(shè)想。本文除引言和結(jié)論外，正文共分為三部分： 第一部分：國內(nèi)外受賄罪量刑制度的比較與評(píng)述。在受賄罪的量刑研究方面，國內(nèi)外一些國家和地區(qū)的先進(jìn)立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)給了我們很多有益的啟示，本文選擇了美國、日本這兩個(gè)較具代表性的英美法系國家和大陸法系國家以及中國的香港、臺(tái)灣地區(qū)進(jìn)行比較分析，對(duì)于我國受賄罪量刑的立法體制建立和立法理念的更新具有重要的借鑒意義。比如犯罪情節(jié)必要的擴(kuò)充、增加罰金刑與資格刑的適用、沒收財(cái)產(chǎn)制度的完善等等。 第二部分：我國現(xiàn)今受賄罪量刑中存在的問題�；谖覈苜V罪的立法現(xiàn)狀，并結(jié)合《人民法院量刑指導(dǎo)意見》（試行）》以及熱點(diǎn)案例來探究我國受賄罪量刑的立法缺陷和制度缺失。主要分析了司法實(shí)踐中存在的比照貪污罪量刑不合理、量刑失衡等嚴(yán)重問題的表現(xiàn)及產(chǎn)生原因。從“同罪不同罰”現(xiàn)象普遍、減刑處罰幅度過大、法定和酌定量刑情節(jié)認(rèn)定寬泛、緩刑適用率偏高這幾個(gè)方面具體分析論述了在受賄罪量刑中亟待解決的問題。 第三部分：完善我國受賄罪量刑制度的構(gòu)思。在總結(jié)國外立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)實(shí)國情，從完善受賄罪的相關(guān)立法內(nèi)容、重構(gòu)受賄罪量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及規(guī)范受賄罪量刑情節(jié)的適用這三個(gè)方面提出構(gòu)建我國受賄罪量刑制度的思考與意見。最終實(shí)現(xiàn)在立法上確立以犯罪情節(jié)為中心的受賄罪量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，并嚴(yán)格規(guī)范各種從重或從輕、減輕情節(jié)的適用；在司法上，配合受賄罪量刑指導(dǎo)意見與典型案例指導(dǎo)制度，共同推進(jìn)受賄罪的量刑規(guī)范化的改革進(jìn)程。
[Abstract]:The crime of corruption and bribery is a historical and global problem, is one of the serious challenges faced by every country in the world. In the crime of corruption and bribery, the absolute proportion of the crime of bribery, and serious harm, not only a threat to state safety, smear clean duty, also seriously disrupted social order and economic environment at present, our country is in economic transformation and social reform period, corruption is more serious, major cases of corruption for people emerge in an endless stream, hated. Face the reality of the anti-corruption needs and rising corruption of public opinion, our country no matter from the system or judicial have increased anti-corruption efforts, in 2013 the central deployment of anti-corruption work when "we must strengthen the restriction and supervision of power operation and promote the construction of anti-corruption laws and regulations". Under the government attaches great importance to China's anti-corruption Failure has made great progress, but also exposed many new problems. Especially due to the bribery crime legislative defects and judicial oversight, resulting in the crime of bribery sentencing is not standardized, the problem of unbalance of sentencing specific performance for some cases is very serious. The basic principles of criminal law sentencing not only violates crime to adapt and can not achieve a good effect of punishment and education punishment of criminals, and will largely affect the authority of the law and can be expected, the basic value of criminal justice damage.
The problems on the crime of bribery, in some foreign countries such as the United States and Japan, relatively early and in-depth study and investigation of China Hongkong and Taiwan area to carry out time, research in this field is relatively advanced and mature stage, both the advanced legislative model and accumulated rich judicial precedent for reference, including there are many advantages worth learning.
On the standardization of sentencing the judicial organs of China has made a lot of useful exploration. Were formulated by two senior department and the Supreme People's court "on the norms of sentencing procedure questions (Trial) >, < People's court sentencing guidelines (Trial) > began a full trial in the country on October 1, 2010. The court with the background of the crime of corruption tendency and sentencing reform, analyzed the problem of sentencing of bribery. The introduction of the United States and Japan as well as Hongkong, the Taiwan area of bribery sentencing system, analysis of China's current bribery crime exists in some non-standard problems, resulting in the substantive legislation and procedure construction etc. put forward the suggestions and ideas of their own. Besides the introduction and conclusion, the text is divided into three parts:
The first part: comparison and review of domestic and foreign bribery sentencing. Sentencing of bribery crime in some countries and regions, the domestic and foreign advanced legislative experience gave us a lot of inspiration, this paper chose the United States, the Anglo American law system countries and civil law countries, Japan the two representative and China the comparative analysis of Hongkong, Taiwan area, is of great significance to China's legislative system of bribery sentencing establishment and legislative idea renewal. For example, the circumstances of the crime the necessary expansion, increase the application of fine penalty and qualification penalty of confiscation of property system and so on.
The second part: the present existing problems in the bribery crime. The legislation of bribery crime in our country based on combining the "people's court sentencing guidelines (Trial) > > and hot case to explore China's sentencing of bribery legislation defects and lack of system. The main analysis of the existing in the judicial practice of sentencing by corruption the crime is not reasonable, and causes serious problems such as the imbalance of sentencing performance. From the" same crime different penalty "phenomenon, commutation punishment is too large, the statutory and discretionary circumstances of sentencing as broad, probation for the high rate of these aspects concretely analyzes and discusses the problems to be solved in the bribery crime sentencing issues.
The third part: the perfection of bribery sentencing system in China. Based on summarizing the conception of foreign legislative experience combined with China's actual conditions, from the relevant contents of the legislation of crime of accepting bribes, bribery and reconstruction of sentencing standards applicable norms of bribery sentencing the three aspects put forward thinking and advice to build bribery sentencing system in the final realization of the circumstances of the crime. As the center of the bribery crime sentencing standards in legislation, and strictly regulate the heavier or lighter, mitigating circumstances; in judicial practice, with bribery sentencing guidelines and typical case guidance system, the standardized sentencing reform process to jointly promote the crime of bribery.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.1

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 朱文悅;;對(duì)《刑法修正案九(草案)》修改受賄罪與行賄罪量刑的思考[J];法制與社會(huì);2015年16期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉通;關(guān)于2014年遼寧省受賄案件量刑狀況的調(diào)研報(bào)告[D];遼寧大學(xué);2015年

本文編號(hào)：1560656