本文選題：刑罰目的　切入點(diǎn)：報(bào)應(yīng)刑論　出處：《廣西大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：刑罰自產(chǎn)生以來(lái),與之相關(guān)的爭(zhēng)論與探索就未曾停止過(guò)。在刑法學(xué)理論中,刑罰目的不僅影響著整個(gè)刑罰體系,也影響著整個(gè)刑事司法過(guò)程和社會(huì)的發(fā)展進(jìn)步。基于不同的背景從政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化、刑事政策,由不同角度對(duì)刑罰目的進(jìn)行分析和研究。目的是全部法律的創(chuàng)造者。所有法律法規(guī)的的產(chǎn)生都源于某種特定目的和實(shí)質(zhì)的動(dòng)機(jī)。刑罰目的有其重要的理論意義和實(shí)踐價(jià)值：它不僅在法律外部評(píng)價(jià)上對(duì)社會(huì)于刑罰的判斷和評(píng)價(jià)有所影響：在法律的實(shí)踐運(yùn)行中對(duì)刑事立法、司法和執(zhí)法均具有指導(dǎo)性決定作用；理論上是刑罰制度的正當(dāng)化事由和存在的依據(jù)。所以,想正確理解和適用刑罰,必須明確刑罰的目的觀,及其在整個(gè)刑罰體系中居于中心地位。 無(wú)論國(guó)外還是國(guó)內(nèi),關(guān)于刑罰目的在學(xué)派之間的對(duì)峙以及觀點(diǎn)之間的分歧,時(shí)至今日仍未達(dá)成共識(shí)。從應(yīng)刑論、目的刑論、一體論到具此些理論衍生的其他各種紛繁復(fù)雜的理論爭(zhēng)論,應(yīng)該知道,刑罰目的理論理應(yīng)吸收并且結(jié)合報(bào)應(yīng)、目的刑論之間的合理要素,并且對(duì)其中各要素作邏輯分析重點(diǎn)排序,務(wù)求實(shí)現(xiàn)多元化刑罰目的體系的內(nèi)部和諧
[Abstract]:Since the birth of penalty, the related arguments and explorations have never stopped. In the theory of criminal law, the purpose of penalty not only affects the whole penalty system, It also affects the development and progress of the entire criminal justice process and society. Based on different backgrounds, from political, economic, cultural, criminal policy, The purpose is the creator of all laws. All laws and regulations are produced from a certain specific purpose and substantial motive. The purpose of penalty has its important theoretical significance and significance. Practical value: it not only has an influence on the judgment and evaluation of social penalty in the external evaluation of law, but also on the criminal legislation in the practice of law. Both the judicature and the law enforcement have the guiding and decisive function; theoretically, they are the justification of the penalty system and the basis of its existence. Therefore, in order to correctly understand and apply the penalty, it is necessary to make clear the view of the purpose of the penalty. And it occupies the central position in the whole penalty system. Whether at home or abroad, there is still no consensus on the confrontation between schools and views on the purpose of punishment. From this theory, we should know that the theory of the purpose of punishment should be absorbed and combined with retribution, the reasonable elements between the theory of teleological punishment, And make a logical analysis of the key elements in order to achieve the internal harmony of the multi-purpose system of punishment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D924.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳興良;周光權(quán);;超越報(bào)應(yīng)主義與功利主義:忠誠(chéng)理論——對(duì)刑法正當(dāng)根據(jù)的追問(wèn)[J];北大法律評(píng)論;1998年01期

2 徐愛(ài)國(guó);解析《圣經(jīng)》里的法律思想[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

3 衣家奇;;基督教原罪論對(duì)現(xiàn)代刑法的啟蒙[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

4 韓軼;刑罰目的層次性辯說(shuō)——兼論刑罰的最終目的[J];法商研究;2004年04期

5 趙冬燕;;對(duì)刑罰報(bào)應(yīng)性的理性思考[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年03期

6 陳興良;;寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)政策與刑罰規(guī)制[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年04期

7 陳興良;;刑罰改革論綱[J];法學(xué)家;2006年01期

8 屈耀倫;;預(yù)防與報(bào)應(yīng):刑罰目的的二元構(gòu)建[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2006年01期

9 張莉;報(bào)應(yīng)之刑與預(yù)防之刑的價(jià)值思考[J];公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年06期

10 王宏玉;規(guī)誡的力量——談刑罰之一般預(yù)防[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1557446