發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-02 07:29

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益 占有說(shuō) 占有 財(cái)產(chǎn) 債權(quán)　出處：《廣西師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪在我們的社會(huì)生活中具有多發(fā)的特性,因此對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益的研究具有深刻的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益是一個(gè)重要的刑法概念,與其他刑法概念有著天然的血緣聯(lián)系,對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益概念的深入探究,可以幫助我們更精確地判斷財(cái)產(chǎn)犯罪的性質(zhì),構(gòu)建財(cái)產(chǎn)罪體系,保護(hù)財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)利人的合法權(quán)益。但是,當(dāng)前刑法學(xué)界對(duì)于財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益的確定仍有著諸多的爭(zhēng)論,因此,對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益進(jìn)行界定并且解答有關(guān)財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益的疑難問(wèn)題,就顯得尤為重要和迫切。 為了更好地了解財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益的概念,本文首先介紹了財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益的發(fā)展歷史。由于古代社會(huì)的資源匱乏,社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)關(guān)系簡(jiǎn)單,財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益在古代社會(huì)是一個(gè)較為簡(jiǎn)單的法律概念,但是隨著社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷發(fā)展,財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益的發(fā)展呈現(xiàn)出復(fù)雜化和擴(kuò)大化的趨勢(shì)。在此歷史背景下,對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益的研究不是孤立的,只有理清財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益與相關(guān)刑法概念的關(guān)系,并明確財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益在整個(gè)刑法解釋論中的地位,才能更好地構(gòu)建財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益體系,乃至整個(gè)刑法體系。 日本、德國(guó)的財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益理論研究在世界范圍內(nèi)處于領(lǐng)先地位,對(duì)日本、德國(guó)的財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益理論進(jìn)行學(xué)習(xí)和借鑒,是本文進(jìn)行論證的基石。日本的財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益理論注重財(cái)物背后權(quán)益的探討,而德國(guó)的財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益理論注重對(duì)財(cái)物自身屬性的分析,是解決同一問(wèn)題的兩種思路。日本財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益理論具有代表性的學(xué)說(shuō)包括本權(quán)說(shuō)、占有說(shuō)以及從本權(quán)說(shuō)或占有說(shuō)出發(fā)的中間說(shuō),德國(guó)財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益理論則以法律財(cái)產(chǎn)說(shuō)、經(jīng)濟(jì)財(cái)產(chǎn)說(shuō)以及法律經(jīng)濟(jì)財(cái)產(chǎn)說(shuō)為代表,對(duì)這些學(xué)說(shuō)的研究,可以幫助我們更好地認(rèn)識(shí)到財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益的本質(zhì)。 本文最終提倡占有說(shuō),是因?yàn)橥ㄟ^(guò)分析和比對(duì),發(fā)現(xiàn)本權(quán)說(shuō)在司法實(shí)踐中存在諸多的困境,如對(duì)非法占有以及違禁品處理的不力,但若采用占有說(shuō)并進(jìn)行“修正”,則不會(huì)面臨這些困境,因此占有說(shuō)是更符合司法實(shí)踐需求的學(xué)說(shuō)。當(dāng)然,對(duì)占有說(shuō)的提倡還涉及相關(guān)占有問(wèn)題的明晰,包括刑法與民法中占有的區(qū)別,以及刑法中占有的認(rèn)定,本文對(duì)這些問(wèn)題均一一做出了分析。 需要承認(rèn)的是,對(duì)占有說(shuō)的提倡并不代表財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益的完全明確,因?yàn)樵诂F(xiàn)實(shí)的司法實(shí)踐中某些特殊財(cái)物的占有認(rèn)定是極其困難的,而且占有說(shuō)是針對(duì)有體財(cái)物而言,對(duì)于無(wú)體財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益的侵害以及財(cái)物的經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值(即成立財(cái)產(chǎn)罪要求認(rèn)定的經(jīng)濟(jì)上的損害程度),依據(jù)占有說(shuō)均無(wú)法得到解答。因此,本文在占有說(shuō)的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)具有代表性的幾類特殊占有認(rèn)定進(jìn)行了論述,以期為其他特殊占有的認(rèn)定提供基本的思路,并對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值的考量、不動(dòng)產(chǎn)能否成為財(cái)產(chǎn)罪行為對(duì)象等問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了分析。最后,本文著重探討了財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益視角下的債權(quán),并參照德國(guó)的財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益理論學(xué)說(shuō),對(duì)不完全債權(quán)和與債權(quán)相關(guān)行為進(jìn)行具體的探討,目的是為了彌補(bǔ)占有說(shuō)在解釋論上的缺憾,為財(cái)產(chǎn)性利益的財(cái)產(chǎn)罪法益保護(hù)提供理由,以及確立經(jīng)濟(jì)損害的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
[Abstract]:Property crime has the characteristics of multiple in our social life, so the study of property crimes law has profound practical significance. Property crime law is an important concept of criminal law, there is a natural kinship with other criminal concept of property crime law benefits the concept of deep exploration, can help we more accurately judge the nature of property crime, building property crimes system, to protect the property rights of the legitimate rights and interests. However, the current criminal law to determine the property of the legal interest of the crime is still a lot of controversy, therefore, difficult problems are defined and answer questions about the crime of property law on property crime law benefits. It is particularly important and urgent.
In order to better understand the concept of crime of property interests, this paper first introduces the development history of property crime law. Because the ancient society lack of resources, social and economic relations, property crime law is a relatively simple legal concept in ancient society, but along with the social economy's development, the development of property crime law the benefit of showing a complex and expanding trend. In this historical background, the study of property crimes law is not isolated, only to clarify property crime law and the related legal concepts, and clearly on the status of the property crime law in the interpretation of criminal law, building property crimes law system in order to better, and the whole system of criminal law.
In Japan, research on the theory of legal interests of property crime in Germany is in the leading position in the world of Japanese, German property crime law theory reference and study, is the foundation of this argument. To investigate the Japanese property crime law theory on property rights behind Germany, and focus on the theory of legal interests of property crime analysis of the property itself, are two ways to solve the same problem. Japanese property crime law theory of representative theories including the right of possession, and from the right or possession of the center said, the German property crime theory of legal interests in property law, economy and property. The law of economic property as the representative, the study of these theories, we can better understand the essence of the property of the legal interest of the crime.
This paper finally advocate possession, because through the analysis and comparison, found this right to say that there are many difficulties in the judicial practice, such as the illegal possession of contraband and ineffective treatment, but if the use of possession and "correction" will not be faced with these difficulties, so for there are said to be more in line with the needs of the judicial practice the theory of possession. Of course, the related problems also advocate share clear, including the differences between possession in criminal law and civil law, criminal law and possession of identification, the paper on these issues are made one by one analysis.
Admittedly, the possession of that property advocate does not mean the legal interest of the crime completely clear, because in the reality of judicial practice in particular the possession of the property that is extremely difficult, and possession for the body of the property, the intangible property interests of the violations of property and economic value (the extent of damage the establishment of crime of property requirements identified on the economy, on the basis of possession) were unable to get answers. Therefore, based on the possession of that, the representative of several special possession cognizance are discussed, in order to provide the basic idea that other special possession, and the economic value of the property consider, real estate will become the issue of property crime object are analyzed. Finally, this paper focuses on the property of the legal interest of the crime from the perspective of creditor's rights, and said to refer to the German property crime law theory of incomplete The purpose of the discussion is to make up for the shortcomings of the theory of possession in the theory of interpretation, and to provide justification for the protection of legal interests of property interests, and to establish the criteria for determining economic damages.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D914

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 季境;;占有之債權(quán)保護(hù)路徑思考[J];法律適用;2012年03期

2 童偉華;;債權(quán)行使與財(cái)產(chǎn)罪[J];法治研究;2011年10期

3 尹婕;;論財(cái)產(chǎn)罪的保護(hù)法益——本權(quán)說(shuō)與占有說(shuō)的沖突[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

4 童偉華;;所有權(quán)與占有的刑、民關(guān)系[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1555576