本文關(guān)鍵詞： 合同 合同詐騙 犯罪對象 非法占有 民事欺詐　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 合同詐騙罪是破壞社會(huì)主義市場經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序罪中的新型多發(fā)性犯罪,隨著我國市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的迅速發(fā)展,合同詐騙罪的社會(huì)危害性日益嚴(yán)重。但是,在刑法理論界和司法實(shí)務(wù)界,對如何正確認(rèn)定該罪還有一些爭議。本文主要圍繞合同詐騙罪爭議較大的五個(gè)問題,結(jié)合刑法理論和司法實(shí)踐進(jìn)行了初步探討。 本文分為五個(gè)部分,約31000字。 一、合同詐騙罪中“合同”的界定。該部分著重探討了三個(gè)問題。其一是合同詐騙罪中合同的內(nèi)涵。筆者認(rèn)為,合同詐騙罪中“合同”的內(nèi)涵是在市場經(jīng)濟(jì)中體現(xiàn)合同詐騙犯罪的客體性質(zhì)和合同當(dāng)事人之間財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系的財(cái)產(chǎn)合同。其二是合同詐騙罪中合同的外延。筆者系統(tǒng)探討了《合同法》、《擔(dān)保法》、涉外經(jīng)濟(jì)合同中可構(gòu)成合同詐騙罪的合同種類。行政合同、勞動(dòng)合同、國家合同不能成為合同詐騙罪中的合同。其三是合同詐騙罪中合同的形式。筆者認(rèn)為,合同詐騙罪中的合同應(yīng)以書面合同為原則,口頭合同為例外。這里所說的口頭合同,應(yīng)僅限于經(jīng)濟(jì)合同的口頭形式。 二、合同詐騙罪犯罪對象研究。首先,筆者認(rèn)為合同詐騙罪的對象應(yīng)是公私財(cái)物,而非合同本身。其次,筆者探討了不動(dòng)產(chǎn)、知識產(chǎn)權(quán)、非法取得的財(cái)產(chǎn)、違禁品以及勞務(wù)能否成為合同詐騙的犯罪對象這一問題。筆者認(rèn)為,不動(dòng)產(chǎn)、非法取得的財(cái)產(chǎn)、部分違禁品可以成為合同詐騙罪的犯罪對象。而知識產(chǎn)權(quán)和勞務(wù)不能成為合同詐騙罪的犯罪對象。 三、合同詐騙罪中犯罪目的研究。該部分著重探討了三個(gè)問題。其一是“非法占有”與“非法占用”的區(qū)別問題。刑法上的非法占有完全可以理解為非法所有,而非法占用則是意圖非法利用他人的財(cái)物為其牟利的意思。但是在一定的條件下,“非法占用”可以轉(zhuǎn)化為“非法占有”。其二是“非法占有為目的”存在時(shí)間的認(rèn)定問題。筆者認(rèn)為,“非法占有目的”產(chǎn)生時(shí)間只能存在于合同簽訂之前或合同簽訂之后對方當(dāng)事人交付(處分)財(cái)物之前。而不存在所謂的事后的故意。其三是“非法占有為目的”的司法認(rèn)定問題。筆者認(rèn)為,認(rèn)定“以非法占有為目的”,應(yīng)堅(jiān)持主觀與客觀相結(jié)合及綜合評判的評價(jià)方法,并提出了十種可以推定行為人具有非法占有目的的情況。 四、合同詐騙罪“數(shù)額”問題研究。該部分著重探討了三個(gè)問題。其一是合同詐騙罪數(shù)額的科學(xué)內(nèi)涵問題。筆者對合同詐騙罪“數(shù)額較大”、“數(shù)額巨大”、“數(shù)額特別巨大”的具體數(shù)額標(biāo)準(zhǔn)作了大膽設(shè)計(jì)。其二是合同詐騙罪數(shù)額認(rèn)定問題。合同詐騙罪數(shù)額的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)以犯罪造成的直接損失額為準(zhǔn),同時(shí)以合同標(biāo)的額作為量刑因素考慮。數(shù)額計(jì)算標(biāo)準(zhǔn)應(yīng)以詐騙行為當(dāng)時(shí)、當(dāng)?shù)卦撐锲返氖袌鰞r(jià)格為準(zhǔn),同時(shí)參照被騙者的實(shí)際損失。其三是連環(huán)合同詐騙數(shù)額和共同合同詐騙數(shù)額的計(jì)算問題。 五、合同詐騙罪與民事欺詐行為的界限。該部分著重探討了兩個(gè)問題。其一是民事欺詐行為的含義及特征。其二是民事欺詐行為與合同詐騙罪的聯(lián)系與區(qū)別。民事欺詐行為與合同詐騙罪在性質(zhì)、主觀方面、客觀方面、客體、法律后果這五方面存在差異。
[Abstract]:The crime of contract fraud is a new type of multiple crime in the crime of undermining the order of socialist market economy, with the rapid development of China's market economy, the crime of contract fraud is more and more serious. However, in criminal law theory and the judicial practice, how to correctly identify the crime is still controversial. This paper mainly focuses on the five the larger problem of contract fraud dispute, combined with the theory of criminal law and judicial practice are discussed.
This article is divided into five parts, about 31000 words.
A contract fraud in the "contract" defined. This part mainly discusses three problems. One is the connotation of contract fraud crime. The author believes that the contract fraud in the "contract" connotation is in the market economy reflects the nature of the object of the crime of contract fraud and contract of property relations between the parties the second is the extension of property contract. Contract fraud crime. The author discusses "contract law", "guarantee law", the foreign economic contract can constitute the crime of contract fraud type of contract. Administrative contract, labor contract, contract not become national contract fraud crime of contract fraud is the contract. In the crime form. The author believes that the contract fraud in the contract shall be in written contract principle, oral contract as an exception. The oral contract, should be limited to the oral form of economic contract.
Two, research on the crime of contract fraud crime object. Firstly, the author thinks that the object of contract fraud should be the public or private property, rather than the contract itself. Secondly, the author discusses the real estate, intellectual property, illegal property, contraband goods and services can become the object of crime of contract fraud this problem. I think, not real estate, illegally acquired property, some contraband can become the object of the crime of contract fraud. But the intellectual property rights and labor can not become the object of the crime of contract fraud.
Three, the research purpose of crime in the crime of contract fraud. This part mainly discusses three problems. One is the difference between "the problem of illegal possession" and "illegal occupation" of illegal possession in criminal law can be understood as illegal possession, and illegal occupation of property is the intention of others for the illegal use of profit means but under certain conditions, the "illegal occupation" can be translated as "illegal possession". The second is "for the purpose of illegal possession of the problems in time. The author believes that" the purpose of illegal possession "time can only exist in the contract before the contract or the other party before delivery (punishment) property. Intentional but there is no so-called afterwards. The third is the" illegal judicial cognizance for the purpose of "possession. I think that" for the purpose of illegal possession ", should adhere to the combination of subjective and objective and comprehensive The evaluation method is combined with the evaluation method, and ten kinds of circumstances that can be presumed by the perpetrator with the purpose of illegal possession are put forward.
Four, the crime of contract fraud "amount" problem research. This part mainly discusses three problems. One is the scientific connotation of amount of contract fraud. The author of the contract fraud in the "large amount", "huge amount", "huge amount" of the specific amount of the standard made bold design. The second is the amount of the contract fraud identified. Direct losses cognizance standard amount of contract fraud should be caused by the crime as the standard, at the same time to the subject of the contract amount as sentencing considerations. Calculate the amount of the standard should be fraud at the time, the local goods market price as the standard, with reference to the actual loss. Third cheated is the problem of computing the amount of the amount of chain contract fraud and common contract fraud.
Five, the boundaries of the crime of contract fraud and civil fraud. This part mainly discusses two problems. One is the meaning and characteristics of civil fraud. The second is the relationship between civil fraud and contract fraud, civil fraud and contract fraud in nature, subjective, objective, object. There are five aspects of the legal consequences of this difference.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D924.3

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張敬;合同詐騙罪疑難問題探討[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

2 梁立寶;合同詐騙罪若干疑難問題研究[D];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2011年

，

本文編號：1533882