本文關(guān)鍵詞： 盜竊罪 數(shù)額 定罪 量刑 標準　出處：《西南政法大學》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：盜竊罪,伴隨著私有制的誕生,是生活中最常見,種類最繁多的犯罪類型之一。從古到今,數(shù)額都在盜竊罪的定罪量刑標準上占有很重要的地位,直觀且具體。但是現(xiàn)行過于嚴格且死板的數(shù)額標準已經(jīng)滯后于社會需求,有鑒于此,筆者試圖對新中國成立以來的刑法中關(guān)于盜竊罪數(shù)額規(guī)定進行分析,并且提出建議。 本文除開導(dǎo)言本文內(nèi)容分三個部分： 第一部分梳理了數(shù)額在我國刑法中的現(xiàn)狀以及地位,數(shù)額對于定罪以及量刑的影響。主要是關(guān)于1979年《中華人民共和國刑法》,1997年修訂的《中華人民共和國刑法》以及《刑法修正案(八)》對于盜竊罪的規(guī)定的之分析,在此基礎(chǔ)上總結(jié)我國刑法中盜竊罪定罪量刑數(shù)額標準的特點。 第二部分在我國刑法盜竊罪中定罪量刑數(shù)額標準特點的基礎(chǔ)上依次分析了數(shù)額作為盜竊罪定罪量刑標準的幾點不合理性。從對于數(shù)額標準的單純區(qū)域性劃分的不合理性,熟人之間的盜竊用普通盜竊數(shù)額標準的不合理性,以及盜竊罪缺少退贓或補償損失后關(guān)于減免刑罰的標準的不合理性三個方面來分析： 第三部分對于現(xiàn)存的不合理性提出了三點建議,一是取消數(shù)額的強制性標準,二是確立熟人之間與普通盜竊不同數(shù)額標準,非親屬與家庭成員的熟人盜竊中允許被害人參與公訴意見。三是在在積極退賠獲得被害人諒解的情形下應(yīng)規(guī)定特別的數(shù)額標準。
[Abstract]:Larceny, accompanied by the birth of private ownership, is one of the most common and varied types of crimes in life. From ancient to present, the amount of crime has played an important role in the standard of conviction and sentencing of larceny. In view of the fact that the present standard of amount is too strict and rigid has lagged behind the social demand, the author tries to analyze the provisions of the amount of larceny in the criminal law since the founding of New China, and put forward some suggestions. In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into three parts:. The first part combs the current situation and status of the amount in the criminal law of our country. The impact of the amount on conviction and sentencing. It is mainly about the analysis of the provisions of the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China on 1979, the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China as amended in 1997, and the Criminal Law Amendment (8) of the Criminal Law on the crime of theft. On this basis, the characteristics of the crime of larceny conviction and sentencing standard in our criminal law are summarized. In the second part, on the basis of the characteristics of the standard of conviction and sentencing in the larceny of criminal law of our country, the author analyzes the irrationality of the amount as the standard of conviction and sentencing of the crime of larceny in turn. The theft between acquaintances is analyzed from three aspects: the irrationality of the standard of ordinary theft amount, and the irrationality of the standard of commutation of penalty after the larceny lacks the return of the stolen goods or compensates for the loss. The third part puts forward three suggestions for the existing irrationality, one is to cancel the mandatory standard of the amount, the other is to establish the different amount standard between acquaintances and ordinary theft. In the theft of acquaintances of non-relatives and family members, the victim is allowed to participate in the public prosecution opinion.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 賈敬華;;司法自由裁量權(quán)的現(xiàn)實分析[J];河北法學;2006年04期

2 黃祥青;;認定多次盜竊的事實與法理依據(jù)[J];人民司法;2009年09期

3 陳興良;作為犯罪構(gòu)成要件的罪量要素——立足于中國刑法的探討[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2003年03期

4 劍文;試論量刑情節(jié)的量化[J];政治與法律;1989年06期

，

本文編號：1529479