本文關鍵詞： 犯罪故意 構成要件錯誤 禁止錯誤 規(guī)范性構成要件要素　出處：《華東政法大學學報》2017年06期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：在趙春華非法持有槍支案中,二審法院與辯護律師的爭議之一在于趙春華是否具備犯罪故意。我國刑法明確規(guī)定了一個實質的犯罪故意概念,該犯罪故意不僅包含構成要件故意,而且包含罪責故意與不法意識(社會危害性認識)。認定趙春華具備非法持有槍支的故意,首先必須證明其對于"槍支"這一規(guī)范性構成要件要素具備完全的意義認識,但從本案的案情來看,根據(jù)"外行人領域的平行評價標準",趙春華缺乏這一意義認識,因此成立構成要件錯誤,從而排除故意;其次必須證明其對于"違反槍支管理規(guī)定"這一空白構成要件要素存在明知,但從案情來看,這一明知也無法成立。即使認定趙春華對于"違反槍支管理規(guī)定"存在明知,其也可以援引不可避免的禁止錯誤為其出罪。
[Abstract]:In the case of illegal possession of firearms by Zhao Chunhua, one of the disputes between the court of second instance and the defense lawyer is whether Zhao Chunhua has criminal intent. The intention of the crime not only includes the elements of intent, but also includes the intention of crime and responsibility and the consciousness of lawlessness (social harmfulness cognition). Zhao Chunhua is found to have the intention of illegally holding guns. First of all, it must prove that it has a complete meaning for the "firearm" as a normative component element, but from the case of the case, according to the "parallel evaluation criteria in the field of layman". Zhao Chunhua lacks this meaning cognition, therefore establishes the constitution element mistake, thus excludes intentionally; Secondly, it must prove its knowledge of the "violation of firearms regulation" as a blank constitutive element, but from the point of view of the case. Even if Zhao Chunhua was found to have knowledge of "violating gun regulations," he could invoke the inevitable prohibition of error as a crime.
【作者單位】： 北京大學法學院;
【分類號】：D924.3
【正文快照】： 目　次一、犯罪故意的構造與錯誤理論二、對于“槍支”的認識及其錯誤三、對于“違反槍支管理規(guī)定”的認識及其錯誤四、結語 一般認為,故意犯罪的成立不僅要求行為人的行為符合客觀構成要件,而且在主觀上必須具備故意。在趙春華非法持有槍支一案中,從客觀構成要件上看,公眾和

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 袁國何;;論容許構成要件錯誤的責任效果[J];刑事法評論;2013年01期

2 梁云寶;;三階層犯罪構成體系下構成要件錯誤理論探疑[J];政治與法律;2013年04期

，

本文編號：1478763