發(fā)布時間：2018-01-30 19:12

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 司法工作人員 贓物 取得行為 定罪　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：司法工作人員利用職務(wù)取得贓物行為,在當(dāng)下時有發(fā)生,然對其定性卻混亂不堪。雖然我國現(xiàn)行刑法中針對贓物的犯罪有專門的規(guī)定,但是目前無論在理論界還是在司法實(shí)務(wù)界對贓物的概念卻都沒有形成共識,針對司法工作人員取得贓物的犯罪行為更鮮有論述。本文通過分析司法工作人員的取得贓物行為,透過法律條文表面的含義,探求法律規(guī)定的實(shí)質(zhì)。以司法工作人員取得贓物行為之一典型案例為切入點(diǎn),對贓物進(jìn)行全方面的解構(gòu),對司法工作人員取得贓物行為不同類型進(jìn)行詳盡的甄別和梳理,在此基礎(chǔ)上圍繞對司法工作人員取得贓物不同類型行為的定性展開論述,對司法工作人員取得行為的方式一一梳理,并對涉及的相關(guān)罪名(如侵占罪、盜竊罪、貪污罪等等)做出深入探究,對該類行為正確定罪量刑,以期助益解決實(shí)踐之疑難案例。本文除引言和余論外,主體分為三大部分:一、司法工作人員取得贓物行為的基本概述。此部分重點(diǎn)對贓物的概念由淺入深的進(jìn)行厘清,對于司法工作人員及取得行為則做以簡述。我國刑法對于何為贓物并未明確界定。因此筆者著重對贓物的概念正名,對贓物的界定從贓物之歷史變遷及其內(nèi)涵外延之維度展開,通過古今以及中外比較,得出贓物的概念即贓物在刑法領(lǐng)域內(nèi)定義為因犯罪所得之財產(chǎn)。司法工作人員即從事偵查、起訴、審判、監(jiān)督工作的人員。本文重點(diǎn)研究的司法工作人員取得贓物行為是指司法工作人員利用其特定身份或工作便利,通過各種不合法手段占有贓物的行為。二、司法工作人員取得贓物行為的類型。此部分將從刑法框架內(nèi)探究司法工作人員取得贓物行為之類型,以引言案例為切入點(diǎn),筆者以取得贓物行為之方式,將行為分為以下幾類:侵占式取得贓物行為、竊取式取得贓物行為、枉法式取得贓物行為。三、司法工作人員取得贓物行為的定性。此部分以對司法工作人員取得贓物行為可能涉及的幾種類罪為基礎(chǔ),從類罪構(gòu)成要件之理解展述拙文研究內(nèi)容。針對侵占式取得贓物行為,筆者從侵占罪、貪污罪以及隱瞞掩飾犯罪所得、犯罪所得收益罪逐一進(jìn)行辨析。針對竊取式取得贓物行為則從盜竊罪和貪污罪這兩個爭議罪名展開論述,針對枉法式取得贓物行為則從是否構(gòu)成徇私枉法罪這一罪名展開討論,在對幾類行為研究基礎(chǔ)之上,提出對問題的進(jìn)一步思考。
[Abstract]:Judicial staff use their duties to obtain stolen goods, which occurs from time to time, but its characterization is chaotic. Although there are special provisions in the current criminal law of our country for the crime of stolen goods. However, at present, there is no consensus on the concept of stolen goods in either the theoretical field or the judicial practice field. The criminal behavior of obtaining stolen goods for judicial staff is less discussed. This paper analyzes the criminal acts of obtaining stolen goods by judicial staff through the surface of the meaning of the legal provisions. To explore the essence of the provisions of the law. Judicial staff to obtain a typical case of stolen goods as a starting point to the stolen goods in all aspects of deconstruction. On the basis of the detailed identification and combing of different types of acts of obtaining stolen goods by judicial staff, the qualitative analysis of different types of acts of obtaining stolen goods by judicial staff is discussed. The way of obtaining behavior of judicial staff is combed one by one, and the related charges (such as embezzlement, theft, embezzlement and so on) are deeply explored, and this kind of behavior is correctly convicted and sentenced. In order to help solve the difficult cases of practice. In addition to the introduction and the conclusion, the main body is divided into three parts: first. This part focuses on the concept of stolen goods from the shallow to clarify. For the judicial staff and the acquisition of conduct to do a brief description. Our criminal law for what is stolen goods is not clearly defined. Therefore, the author focuses on the concept of stolen goods to correct the name. The definition of stolen goods from the historical changes and the connotation of the dimensions of extension, through the ancient and modern as well as the comparison between China and foreign countries. In the field of criminal law, the concept of stolen goods is defined as property derived from crime. Judicial personnel are engaged in investigation, prosecution and trial. Supervision of the personnel. The focus of this article on the acquisition of stolen goods by judicial staff refers to the use of their specific identity or work convenience, through various illegal means of possession of stolen goods. 2. This part will explore the types of acts of stolen goods obtained by judicial staff from the framework of criminal law, with the introduction of cases as the starting point, the author to obtain stolen property behavior. The behavior can be divided into the following categories: embezzlement, theft, perversion. This part is based on several kinds of crimes that may be involved in the acquisition of stolen goods by judicial staff. From the understanding of the constitutive elements of the category of crimes to develop the content of my research. In view of the embezzlement to obtain stolen goods, the author from the embezzlement, embezzlement and concealment of the proceeds of crime. The crime of proceeds of crime is analyzed one by one. The crime of stealing stolen goods is discussed from the two controversial charges of theft and embezzlement. On the basis of the study of several kinds of behavior, the author discusses whether the crime of perverting the law by perverting the law and obtaining stolen goods by perverting the law for personal gain, and puts forward some further thoughts on the problem.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 劉明祥;論侵占遺忘物、埋藏物[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2001年01期

2 陳運(yùn)光;關(guān)于侵占罪中遺忘物、埋藏物的探討[J];人民檢察;1998年09期

，

本文編號：1477015