本文關(guān)鍵詞：事實(shí)婚姻視角下的重婚犯罪研究　出處：《云南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 事實(shí)婚姻 重婚罪 研究

【摘要】：家庭是構(gòu)建社會的基石,惟有家庭安寧,才有國家安康。然而,隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速增長以及人們思想觀念意識的變化,蘊(yùn)含有事實(shí)婚姻的重婚現(xiàn)象愈演愈烈,但與之相反的則是選擇運(yùn)用法律武器捍衛(wèi)自己的配偶權(quán)的受害方以及被以重婚罪定罪量刑的被告者均屈指可數(shù)。例如近兩年轟轟烈烈的反腐行動中大批各級黨政官員相繼被查處,曝光的除了一個個令人觸目驚心的貪污受賄數(shù)額,還有之前黨報(bào)黨刊中甚少出現(xiàn)的詞匯：“通奸”、“不正當(dāng)男女關(guān)系”。筆者從中央紀(jì)委監(jiān)察部網(wǎng)站查詢的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,自2012年底到2015年5月29日止這段期間內(nèi)全國共有741名官員被移送司法機(jī)關(guān)或被組織調(diào)查,其中有148人被官方通報(bào)存在不正當(dāng)男女關(guān)系,僅去年6、7兩個月內(nèi)就通報(bào)了七名落馬官員涉及通奸。但迄今為止,司法實(shí)踐中還沒有一例官員因涉嫌重婚罪被起訴定罪量刑。一方面是社會上姘居、通奸、“包二奶”、“養(yǎng)小三”等現(xiàn)象愈演愈烈,打擊呼聲高漲,而另一方面司法實(shí)踐中重婚罪適用率卻極低,這是為什么呢?姘居、通奸、“包二奶”、“養(yǎng)小三”等現(xiàn)象該如何定性?是否構(gòu)成重婚?對這些行為刑法是否應(yīng)該進(jìn)行規(guī)制?司法實(shí)踐中重婚罪認(rèn)定難、定罪難原因何在?如何破解?實(shí)踐中事實(shí)婚姻與重婚罪的構(gòu)成有何關(guān)系?這一系列問題,是本文論述的主要方向。 本文首先從婚姻、婚姻制度的概念入手,梳理事實(shí)婚姻的概念、特征和立法沿革及其帶來的社會價值,分析實(shí)踐過程中存在的問題、困難,并比較婚姻成立與婚姻生效的差異,以便為科學(xué)界定重婚罪打下基礎(chǔ)。第二部分從事實(shí)婚姻的角度分析重婚罪的構(gòu)成要件,立法演變及現(xiàn)狀,在分析演變過程帶來的社會價值的同時,對我國重婚罪認(rèn)定困難的原因進(jìn)行分析。第三部份在分析學(xué)界關(guān)于事實(shí)婚姻是否構(gòu)成重婚罪的兩種主流觀點(diǎn)后得出筆者的看法,將重婚犯罪與無效婚姻、可撤銷婚姻、非婚同居等相關(guān)行為進(jìn)行罪與非罪界定,并結(jié)合案例對三大類型七種情形下的事實(shí)重婚行為是否構(gòu)成重婚罪進(jìn)行了逐一分析論證,得出“事實(shí)婚姻順序在前或靠后對重婚罪的構(gòu)成并無影響,只要兩個及以上婚姻關(guān)系形成重疊,即可構(gòu)成重婚罪”這一結(jié)論。最后通過對不同法系、不同國家的事實(shí)婚姻、重婚罪立法規(guī)定考察,針對我國現(xiàn)行立法的缺陷及弊端提出完善我國關(guān)于事實(shí)婚姻認(rèn)定及重婚罪立法的建議。
[Abstract]:The family is the cornerstone of social construction, but the peace in the family, only the national well-being. However, with the rapid development of economy and the change of the ideas of the people awareness of the phenomenon of bigamy contains factual marriage intensified, but the opposite is the use of legal weapons to defend their spouse rights of the injured party and the defendant was convicted the crime of bigamy sentencing were numbered. For nearly two years with vigour and vitality's anti-corruption action large number of government officials at all levels have been investigated, in addition to the exposure of a shocking amount of corruption, and in newspapers and journals rarely appeared words: "adultery", "amour". The author from the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection Department the website data show that since the end of 2012 to May 29, 2015 this period a total of 741 officials were transferred to judicial organs or investigation by the organization Among them, 148 people have been officially informed of the existence of improper relationship between men and women, only two months of 6,7 last year was informed the seven sacked officials involved in adultery. But so far, there are no cases officials were prosecuted for alleged bigamy conviction and sentencing in judicial practice. One is social cohabitation, adultery, "kept woman.", "keep growing mistress" phenomenon, against the growing louder, but on the other hand, the practice of bigamy applicable rate is very low, this is why? "Cohabitation, adultery, package," a kept woman "mistress" phenomenon how qualitative? Whether constitute bigamy? The criminal law should be regulation? Judicial practice in the crime of bigamy difficult, where convicted difficult reason? How to crack? What is the relationship between the fact that a marriage and bigamy crime in practice? This is a series of problems, the main direction of this paper.
This paper from the concept of marriage, marriage system, combing the concept of de facto marriage, characteristics and legislative history and the social value, analyzing the problem in practice, difficulties, and compare the establishment of marriage and marriage differences, so as to lay the foundation for scientific definition of marriage. The second part from the Perspective of the crime of factual marriage the analysis of bigamy crime, legislative evolution and current situation of the evolution of the social value at the same time, the reason of difficulty of cognizance of bigamy crime in China were analyzed. The third part of the author's views on the analysis of two main academic point of view on the fact whether the marriage constitute bigamy, the crime of bigamy invalid marriage and revocable marriage, cohabitation, related behavior of crime and non crime definition, combined with the fact bigamy case of three types of seven cases constitute bigamy The crime was analyzed one by one, the "de facto marriage before or after the order by bigamy which has no effect, as long as more than two and the marriage form overlap, this conclusion can constitute the crime of bigamy". By the end of the different legal systems in different countries, de facto marriage legislation, bigamy investigation, for I China's current legislation defects and shortcomings and puts forward to perfect our legislation on factual marriage and bigamy.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D924.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 宋豫;對事實(shí)婚姻的法律思考[J];重慶商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1997年01期

2 余延滿;試論近、現(xiàn)代法上婚姻的本質(zhì)屬性——關(guān)于婚姻概念的反思[J];法學(xué)評論;2002年03期

3 余延滿;論婚姻的成立[J];法學(xué)評論;2004年05期

4 姚虹宇;馮國玉;;淺議重婚罪的界定[J];法制與社會;2012年14期

5 高留志;論非婚同居的立法規(guī)制[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期

6 周惠媛;;準(zhǔn)婚姻關(guān)系下的繼承權(quán)公證[J];中國公證;2006年08期

7 魏漢濤;;以客觀解釋論解讀重婚罪[J];海南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2006年02期

8 陳慶德;劉鋒;;婚姻的理論建構(gòu)與遮蔽[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期

9 張學(xué)軍;事實(shí)婚姻的效力[J];法學(xué)研究;2002年01期

10 萬長源;談?wù)勚鼗樽锱c一夫一妻制[J];律師世界;2001年03期

，

本文編號：1431521