【摘要】：行政刑法規(guī)范作為既違反行政法又違反刑法而形成的一種兼具行政法與刑法雙重屬性的特殊法律規(guī)范。行政刑法的概念產(chǎn)生于德國(guó)，自20世紀(jì)80年代末傳入我國(guó)后，長(zhǎng)久以來(lái)無(wú)論是外國(guó)學(xué)者還是本國(guó)學(xué)者都將研究方向放在行政刑法的性質(zhì)界定、行政犯與刑事犯的區(qū)別上，并且在這個(gè)問(wèn)題上爭(zhēng)論不休，無(wú)法統(tǒng)一。但在這個(gè)行政刑法規(guī)范范圍不斷擴(kuò)大的年代，行政刑法在沒(méi)有獨(dú)立立法的情況下，，導(dǎo)致存在法律條文繁多、法律規(guī)范混亂的情況。面對(duì)這種情況，不應(yīng)該再過(guò)多強(qiáng)調(diào)行政刑法的性質(zhì)歸屬、行政犯與刑事犯的區(qū)別，而應(yīng)將研究視角放到立法層面，由理論回歸到實(shí)踐，解決司法實(shí)踐中實(shí)際存在的操作困境上來(lái)。我國(guó)沒(méi)有德國(guó)等歐洲大陸法系國(guó)家的法治歷史，也沒(méi)有日本法律文化傳統(tǒng)的基礎(chǔ)，我國(guó)的法制史呈現(xiàn)出的是重刑輕民的法律文化和意識(shí)傳統(tǒng)，我國(guó)行政刑法規(guī)范與傳統(tǒng)刑法混合在一部刑法典中，走的是一條具有中國(guó)特色的行政刑法之路。這是法律文化傳統(tǒng)的選擇，也是我國(guó)法治現(xiàn)狀的選擇。本文將通過(guò)文獻(xiàn)研究法和比較研究法，運(yùn)用刑法學(xué)、行政法學(xué)、行政刑法學(xué)的相關(guān)理論，從行政刑法的理論研究入手，比照外國(guó)的立法模式，分析行政刑法在我國(guó)的立法發(fā)展，并進(jìn)一步探討我國(guó)行政刑法未來(lái)重構(gòu)的方向。
[Abstract]:The administrative criminal law norm is a special legal norm which has the dual attribute of administrative law and criminal law, which not only violates the administrative law but also violates the criminal law. The concept of administrative criminal law came into being in Germany. Since it was introduced to China in the late 1980s, both foreign and domestic scholars have long focused on the definition of the nature of administrative criminal law and the difference between administrative and criminal. And on this issue of debate, can not be unified. However, in this era of expanding the scope of administrative criminal law, administrative criminal law in the absence of independent legislation, leading to the existence of a wide range of legal provisions, legal norms confusion. In the face of this situation, we should not emphasize too much the nature of administrative criminal law, the difference between administrative crime and criminal, but should put the research perspective on the legislative level, from theory to practice. To solve the practical operational dilemma in judicial practice. China does not have the legal history of Germany and other European civil law countries, nor does it have the foundation of the Japanese legal cultural tradition. The legal system history of our country presents a legal culture and a tradition of consciousness that punishes the people more than the people. The standard of administrative criminal law and the traditional criminal law are mixed in one criminal code, which is a road of administrative criminal law with Chinese characteristics. This is the choice of the legal culture tradition, also is our country rule of law present situation choice. This paper will analyze the legislative development of administrative criminal law in our country through literature research and comparative research, using the relevant theories of criminal law and administrative criminal law, starting with the theoretical research of administrative criminal law, comparing with the legislative model of foreign countries. And further explore the direction of the future reconstruction of our administrative criminal law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D921;D924

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 赤艷;;關(guān)于改革與完善勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度的立法構(gòu)想[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年S1期

2 李慧英;行政犯罪研究[J];山東工商學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期

3 簡(jiǎn)敏;行政處罰中“一事不再罰”原則的適用與例外[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

4 關(guān)保英;一事不再罰理論的再認(rèn)識(shí)——試從哲學(xué)層面上分析[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期

5 周佑勇,劉艷紅;行政刑法性質(zhì)的科學(xué)定位(上)——從行政法與刑法的雙重視野考察[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2002年02期

6 周佑勇,劉艷紅;行政刑法性質(zhì)的科學(xué)定位(下)——從行政法與刑法的雙重視野考察[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2002年04期

7 趙秉志;鄭延譜;;中國(guó)行政刑法的立法缺憾與改進(jìn)[J];河北法學(xué);2006年08期

8 陳慧君;再論“一事不再罰”原則[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

9 郭潤(rùn)生,劉東生;行政刑罰基本問(wèn)題初探[J];山西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年03期

10 何乃忠;;試論一事不再罰原則[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1993年01期

本文編號(hào)：2426498