我國(guó)偵查權(quán)的程序控制
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-06-10 09:29
【摘要】：本文擬對(duì)從程序控制的角度,對(duì)公安機(jī)關(guān)刑事偵查權(quán)的控制問(wèn)題進(jìn)行研究。2012年刑事訴訟法的修改通過(guò)非法證據(jù)排除的完善等加強(qiáng)了對(duì)公安機(jī)關(guān)偵查權(quán)的控制,但是從學(xué)界討論及司法實(shí)踐來(lái)看,公安機(jī)關(guān)偵查違法的情形層出不窮且屢糾屢犯,刑訊逼供等嚴(yán)重偵查違法還時(shí)有發(fā)生,如何有效控制偵查權(quán)力的良性運(yùn)行、保障犯罪嫌疑人的基本權(quán)利依然是刑事訴訟中亟待解決的問(wèn)題。黨的十八屆四中全會(huì)“推進(jìn)以審判為中心的訴訟制度改革”“規(guī)范司法程序”系列司法改革對(duì)偵查權(quán)的程序控制提出了新要求,在司法改革背景下完善我國(guó)偵查權(quán)的程序控制就有了現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。偵查權(quán)的程序控制是指公安機(jī)關(guān)在行使偵查權(quán)時(shí)必須受到法定程序和正當(dāng)程序的制約和保障。從現(xiàn)有的立法規(guī)定來(lái)看,我國(guó)公安機(jī)關(guān)享有的偵查權(quán)內(nèi)容涉及廣泛,但基于程序控制的必要性以及可行性并結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題,本文集中討論了立案權(quán)、訊問(wèn)權(quán)、搜查權(quán)、逮捕權(quán)、鑒定權(quán)以及技術(shù)偵查權(quán)的程序控制問(wèn)題。本文立足于司法實(shí)踐,通過(guò)調(diào)研走訪了解公安機(jī)關(guān)偵查權(quán)在實(shí)踐中的運(yùn)行狀況,在明確偵查權(quán)程序控制的現(xiàn)狀和缺陷的前提下,借鑒域外偵查權(quán)程序控制的合理因素,提出完善我國(guó)偵查權(quán)程序控制的具體措施。本文認(rèn)為,偵查權(quán)的程序控制有其存在的理論基礎(chǔ)。偵查權(quán)的強(qiáng)制暴力性、主動(dòng)性和單方性、擴(kuò)張性和侵犯性以及秘密性等本質(zhì)屬性決定了其運(yùn)行必須受到正當(dāng)程序的規(guī)制,正當(dāng)程序理念和強(qiáng)制偵查法定原則要求在偵查過(guò)程中使用強(qiáng)制偵查措施要符合法律規(guī)定的實(shí)體要件和程序要件。討論我國(guó)偵查權(quán)的程序控制應(yīng)堅(jiān)持以下理念:保障犯罪嫌疑人、被害人及社會(huì)公眾的基本權(quán)利,保障偵查權(quán)良性運(yùn)行,突出偵查權(quán)的基礎(chǔ)性與初始性地位,權(quán)力限制與自由裁量相平衡,突出偵查權(quán)重點(diǎn)權(quán)項(xiàng)的程序控制。本文對(duì)偵查權(quán)程序控制的立法現(xiàn)狀和實(shí)踐狀況進(jìn)行探討和分析,從目前的法律規(guī)定來(lái)看,我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的偵查權(quán)控制程序總體上表現(xiàn)為以內(nèi)部控制為主、檢察機(jī)關(guān)的審查與監(jiān)督為輔、其他控制形式為補(bǔ)充的程序控權(quán)機(jī)制。從實(shí)踐中的調(diào)研情況來(lái)看,偵查機(jī)關(guān)的內(nèi)部程序控制和檢察機(jī)關(guān)的監(jiān)督程序均發(fā)揮了一定的控制效果并呈現(xiàn)出新的特征。本文對(duì)我國(guó)偵查權(quán)程序控制的缺陷進(jìn)行了分析。偵查權(quán)程序控制從總體控制效果來(lái)看,內(nèi)部控制不足,檢察監(jiān)督乏力,程序性制裁仍存有缺陷。偵查權(quán)具體權(quán)項(xiàng)的控制程序也存在著許多不足,如立案權(quán)的審查和監(jiān)督程序隨意性大,非羈押狀態(tài)下的偵查訊問(wèn)權(quán)未得到規(guī)制,搜查權(quán)審批流于形式,審查批捕程序訴訟化構(gòu)造畸形,鑒定權(quán)缺乏外部制約程序等。本文提出了改革完善我國(guó)偵查權(quán)程序控制的建議。在明確偵查權(quán)程序控制的現(xiàn)狀和缺陷的前提下,綜合借鑒域外偵查權(quán)程序控制的合理因素,提出了完善我國(guó)偵查權(quán)程序控制整體的改革思路和具體完善措施,整體思路是加速程序正義司法理念形成,構(gòu)建訴訟化的審查程序,建立程序性制裁體系以及增強(qiáng)訴權(quán)制約偵查權(quán)程序。
[Abstract]:This paper intends to study the control of the criminal investigation right of the public security organ from the point of view of program control. The amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2012 has strengthened the control of the investigation right of the public security organ through the perfection of the rule of the exclusion of the illegal evidence, but from the discussion of the academic circle and the judicial practice, In order to ensure the effective control of the benign operation of the investigation power, the basic right of the criminal suspect is still a problem to be solved in the criminal procedure. The "To push forward the reform of the litigation system centered on the trial" of the 18th CPC Central Committee of the Fourth Plenary Session of the Fourth Plenary Session of the Fourth Plenary Session of the Central Committee of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC) put forward new requirements on the control of In the background of judicial reform, it is of practical significance to perfect the procedure control of the investigation right in our country. The program control of the investigation right means that the public security organ must be subject to the restriction and guarantee of the legal procedure and due process in the exercise of the investigation power. The contents of the investigation power of the public security organs of our country are extensive, but based on the necessity and feasibility of program control and the problems that arise in the judicial practice, this paper focuses on the right of filing, the right of interrogation, the right to search and the right of right of investigation. This paper is based on the judicial practice, through the investigation and visit to know the health of the investigation right of the public security organ, and on the premise of clear the current situation and the defect of the control of the investigation right, Based on the reasonable factors of the program control of the extraterritorial investigation, the author puts forward the concrete measures to improve the program control of the investigation right in China. In this paper, the author holds that the control of the investigation power has the theoretical basis of its existence. The force of the investigation power, the initiative and the unilateral nature, The essential attributes such as the expansivity and the inviolability and the secrecy decide that the operation must be regulated by the due process. Due to the principle of due process and the principle of mandatory investigation, it is required to use the mandatory investigative measures in the process of investigation to meet the physical requirements and the procedural requirements of the law. The control of the investigation right in our country should adhere to the following concepts: to guarantee the criminal suspect, The basic rights of the victims and the public are to guarantee the benign operation of the investigation right, to highlight the basic and original status of the investigation right, and to balance the power limit and the free cutting amount. In this paper, the status and practice of the control of the control of the investigation power are discussed and analyzed, and from the present legal provisions, the control program of the present investigation power is mainly based on the internal control. The examination and supervision of the procuratorial organ is the subsidiary, and the other control forms are the complementary program control mechanism. The internal control of the investigative organ and the supervision procedure of the procuratorial organ have a certain control effect and present a new characteristic. This paper analyzes the defects of the program control of the investigation power in China. Prosecutorial supervision is weak, and the procedural sanction is still defective. There are many defects in the control procedure of the specific authority of the investigation right, such as the examination of the right of the case and the random nature of the supervision procedure, the right of investigation and interrogation in the non-custodial state is not regulated, and the search right is in the form of approval. In this paper, the author puts forward some suggestions to improve the program control of the investigation right in our country. In this paper, we put forward the reform thought and the concrete improvement measures to perfect the control of the procedure of investigation in our country. The whole thinking is to accelerate the formation of the concept of justice and justice of the procedure, to build a procedure for the review of the proceedings, to establish a procedural sanction system and to strengthen the procedure of the investigation of the right of prosecution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2
本文編號(hào)：2496365
[Abstract]:This paper intends to study the control of the criminal investigation right of the public security organ from the point of view of program control. The amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2012 has strengthened the control of the investigation right of the public security organ through the perfection of the rule of the exclusion of the illegal evidence, but from the discussion of the academic circle and the judicial practice, In order to ensure the effective control of the benign operation of the investigation power, the basic right of the criminal suspect is still a problem to be solved in the criminal procedure. The "To push forward the reform of the litigation system centered on the trial" of the 18th CPC Central Committee of the Fourth Plenary Session of the Fourth Plenary Session of the Fourth Plenary Session of the Central Committee of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC) put forward new requirements on the control of In the background of judicial reform, it is of practical significance to perfect the procedure control of the investigation right in our country. The program control of the investigation right means that the public security organ must be subject to the restriction and guarantee of the legal procedure and due process in the exercise of the investigation power. The contents of the investigation power of the public security organs of our country are extensive, but based on the necessity and feasibility of program control and the problems that arise in the judicial practice, this paper focuses on the right of filing, the right of interrogation, the right to search and the right of right of investigation. This paper is based on the judicial practice, through the investigation and visit to know the health of the investigation right of the public security organ, and on the premise of clear the current situation and the defect of the control of the investigation right, Based on the reasonable factors of the program control of the extraterritorial investigation, the author puts forward the concrete measures to improve the program control of the investigation right in China. In this paper, the author holds that the control of the investigation power has the theoretical basis of its existence. The force of the investigation power, the initiative and the unilateral nature, The essential attributes such as the expansivity and the inviolability and the secrecy decide that the operation must be regulated by the due process. Due to the principle of due process and the principle of mandatory investigation, it is required to use the mandatory investigative measures in the process of investigation to meet the physical requirements and the procedural requirements of the law. The control of the investigation right in our country should adhere to the following concepts: to guarantee the criminal suspect, The basic rights of the victims and the public are to guarantee the benign operation of the investigation right, to highlight the basic and original status of the investigation right, and to balance the power limit and the free cutting amount. In this paper, the status and practice of the control of the control of the investigation power are discussed and analyzed, and from the present legal provisions, the control program of the present investigation power is mainly based on the internal control. The examination and supervision of the procuratorial organ is the subsidiary, and the other control forms are the complementary program control mechanism. The internal control of the investigative organ and the supervision procedure of the procuratorial organ have a certain control effect and present a new characteristic. This paper analyzes the defects of the program control of the investigation power in China. Prosecutorial supervision is weak, and the procedural sanction is still defective. There are many defects in the control procedure of the specific authority of the investigation right, such as the examination of the right of the case and the random nature of the supervision procedure, the right of investigation and interrogation in the non-custodial state is not regulated, and the search right is in the form of approval. In this paper, the author puts forward some suggestions to improve the program control of the investigation right in our country. In this paper, we put forward the reform thought and the concrete improvement measures to perfect the control of the procedure of investigation in our country. The whole thinking is to accelerate the formation of the concept of justice and justice of the procedure, to build a procedure for the review of the proceedings, to establish a procedural sanction system and to strengthen the procedure of the investigation of the right of prosecution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 喬宗樓;;程序性控制思維下偵查權(quán)之進(jìn)路[J];甘肅警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年04期
2 詹建紅;張威;;我國(guó)偵查權(quán)的程序性控制[J];法學(xué)研究;2015年03期
3 孫長(zhǎng)永;武小琳;;新《刑事訴訟法》實(shí)施前后刑事拘留適用的基本情況、變化及完善——基于東、中、西部三個(gè)基層法院判決樣本的實(shí)證研究[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年01期
4 邢曼媛;李朝亮;;公安機(jī)關(guān)執(zhí)法規(guī)范化建設(shè)再思考[J];山西警官高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期
5 龍宗智;;強(qiáng)制偵查司法審查制度的完善[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2011年06期
6 宋佳;張目強(qiáng);;論我國(guó)刑事偵查權(quán)控制機(jī)制的完善——兼評(píng)外國(guó)刑事偵查權(quán)控制機(jī)制[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期
7 李昌林;;審查逮捕程序改革的進(jìn)路——以提高逮捕案件質(zhì)量為核心[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2011年01期
8 龔舉文;;論刑事強(qiáng)制性措施的司法控制[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2010年03期
9 蔡杰;肖偉;;程序控制與權(quán)利制約語(yǔ)境下的偵查權(quán)控制[J];山西警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期
10 左衛(wèi)民;趙開(kāi)年;;偵查監(jiān)督制度的考察與反思——一種基于實(shí)證的研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2006年06期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張崇波;偵查權(quán)的法律控制研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2014年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條
1 黨威;公安機(jī)關(guān)偵查權(quán)運(yùn)行中的制約性因素探究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年
2 韓文靜;正當(dāng)法律程序視野下的偵查權(quán)監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年
3 鄧柳青;論我國(guó)刑事偵查權(quán)制約機(jī)制的完善[D];華南理工大學(xué);2010年
4 于曉川;論我國(guó)偵查權(quán)之司法控制[D];燕山大學(xué);2008年
5 魏全會(huì);論偵查權(quán)的性質(zhì)及其控制[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2005年
，本文編號(hào)：2496365
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2496365.html
最近更新
教材專著
