論庭審模式與查明案件事實(shí)真相
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-06-04 09:07
【摘要】:公正的實(shí)現(xiàn)要求刑事程序查明案件事實(shí)真相,而法庭審理是查明案件事實(shí)真相的關(guān)鍵性程序。以美國為代表的對抗式庭審程序?qū)⒔?jīng)由正當(dāng)程序所得事實(shí)即視為真實(shí),而以德國為代表的審問式庭審程序則以追求實(shí)質(zhì)真實(shí)為目的。我國現(xiàn)行的控辯式庭審模式有自身鮮明的特點(diǎn),但"先定后審"的舊弊仍未革除,庭審實(shí)質(zhì)化難以實(shí)現(xiàn)。對庭審方式的改革應(yīng)當(dāng)堅(jiān)持查明事實(shí)真相,進(jìn)一步推動(dòng)證人出庭作證,擴(kuò)大法律援助范圍,嚴(yán)格實(shí)行非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則,完善認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰從寬制度。
[Abstract]:The realization of justice requires the criminal procedure to find out the truth of the case, and the court trial is the key procedure to find out the truth of the case. The adversarial trial procedure represented by the United States regards the facts obtained through due process as true, while the interrogative trial procedure represented by Germany aims at pursuing substantive truth. The current trial mode of charge and defense in our country has its own distinct characteristics, but the old disadvantages of "deciding first and then trial" have not been eliminated, and it is difficult to realize the materialization of the trial. The reform of trial mode should persist in finding out the truth, further promoting witnesses to testify in court, expanding the scope of legal aid, strictly implementing the rule of excluding illegal evidence, and perfecting the system of lenient confession and punishment.
【作者單位】: 國家"2011計(jì)劃"中國政法大學(xué)司法文明協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心;中國政法大學(xué)刑事司法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】:D925.2
[Abstract]:The realization of justice requires the criminal procedure to find out the truth of the case, and the court trial is the key procedure to find out the truth of the case. The adversarial trial procedure represented by the United States regards the facts obtained through due process as true, while the interrogative trial procedure represented by Germany aims at pursuing substantive truth. The current trial mode of charge and defense in our country has its own distinct characteristics, but the old disadvantages of "deciding first and then trial" have not been eliminated, and it is difficult to realize the materialization of the trial. The reform of trial mode should persist in finding out the truth, further promoting witnesses to testify in court, expanding the scope of legal aid, strictly implementing the rule of excluding illegal evidence, and perfecting the system of lenient confession and punishment.
【作者單位】: 國家"2011計(jì)劃"中國政法大學(xué)司法文明協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心;中國政法大學(xué)刑事司法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】:D925.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 方勇;南凌志;;建立以審判為中心的偽證規(guī)制機(jī)制——基于偽證罪適用的實(shí)證分析[J];人民司法;2015年21期
2 陳光中;;完善的辯護(hù)制度是國家民主法治發(fā)達(dá)的重要標(biāo)志[J];中國法律評論;2015年02期
3 陳光中;于增尊;;嚴(yán)防冤案若干問題思考[J];法學(xué)家;2014年01期
4 許乃曼;茹艷紅;;論刑事訴訟的北美模式[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳韻;;都市類報(bào)紙?jiān)┌笀?bào)道中的內(nèi)容缺位——以三起冤案事件為例[J];視聽;2017年07期
2 陳光中;鄭曦;謝麗珍;;完善證人出庭制度的若干問題探析——基于實(shí)證試點(diǎn)和調(diào)研的研究[J];政法論壇;2017年04期
3 段冉;;論審判中心主義下刑事錯(cuò)案的多元防范機(jī)制[J];智富時(shí)代;2017年06期
4 陳光中;李章仙;;論庭審模式與查明案件事實(shí)真相[J];法學(xué)雜志;2017年06期
5 李章仙;;刑事審辯關(guān)系:模式的異化與回歸[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;2017年04期
6 王\,
本文編號(hào):2492618
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2492618.html
最近更新
教材專著