【摘要】：隨著社會(huì)科技的不斷發(fā)展，科學(xué)技術(shù)越來(lái)越多地被運(yùn)用到訴訟中，并且在刑事訴訟中的作用也越來(lái)越重要。由于法官和當(dāng)事人自身知識(shí)水平的有限性，使得其在訴訟中很難準(zhǔn)確地理解和把握科學(xué)證據(jù)，也使得其在刑事訴訟中不能有效地質(zhì)證。我國(guó)司法鑒定制度的確立是為了解決案件中的專門問(wèn)題，但是，在具體的運(yùn)用中，其不足也逐漸地表現(xiàn)出來(lái)。為了彌補(bǔ)鑒定制度的不足和更好的保障當(dāng)事人的權(quán)利，我國(guó)在刑事訴訟中引入了“有專門知識(shí)的人”即學(xué)界所說(shuō)的專家輔助人這一概念，但是不難看出《刑事訴訟法》以及相關(guān)的司法解釋對(duì)專家輔助人制度的規(guī)定過(guò)于原則和粗疏，在實(shí)際運(yùn)用中必然會(huì)帶來(lái)諸多問(wèn)題。完善刑事訴訟專家輔助人制度，對(duì)促進(jìn)我國(guó)的司法公正，維護(hù)社會(huì)的正義有著十分重要的意義。 全文分為四章，共計(jì)30000余字。 本文的第一章闡述了研究思路，對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)的研究現(xiàn)狀作了介紹，并且說(shuō)明了本文的創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。 本文的第二章介紹了刑事訴訟專家輔助人的基本理論，分別介紹了刑事訴訟專家輔助人的概念和相關(guān)概念的區(qū)別以及其存在的價(jià)值。通過(guò)這一章對(duì)刑事訴訟專家輔助人制度進(jìn)行初步的介紹。 本文的第三章介紹國(guó)外相關(guān)的專家輔助人制度。在這部分中主要是介紹了意大利的技術(shù)顧問(wèn)制度、俄羅斯的專家制度、日本的輔佐人制度。通過(guò)對(duì)相關(guān)制度的介紹以及評(píng)價(jià)，，比較出三國(guó)相關(guān)制度的異同和制度的利弊，從而使我國(guó)在構(gòu)建相關(guān)制度的過(guò)程中能得到很好的啟示。 本文的第四章主要是說(shuō)明我國(guó)刑事訴訟專家輔助人制度的立法現(xiàn)狀以及存在的問(wèn)題，通過(guò)分析這些問(wèn)題，提出相關(guān)的完善意見。
[Abstract]:With the development of social science and technology, science and technology are more and more used in litigation, and the role of science and technology in criminal proceedings is becoming more and more important. Due to the limited level of knowledge of judges and parties, it is difficult for them to understand and grasp scientific evidence accurately in litigation, and also make them unable to effectively prove geological evidence in criminal proceedings. The establishment of judicial expertise system in our country is to solve the special problems in the case, but, in the concrete application, its deficiency also shows gradually. In order to make up for the deficiency of the appraisal system and better protect the rights of the parties, our country has introduced the concept of "the person with specialized knowledge" in the criminal proceedings, that is, the concept of expert assistant, which is referred to by the academic circles. However, it is not difficult to see that the provisions of the Criminal procedure Code and related judicial interpretation to the expert helper system are too principled and careless, which will inevitably bring many problems in the practical application. It is of great significance to improve the system of expert helper in criminal procedure to promote the justice of our country and to safeguard the justice of the society. The full text is divided into four chapters, a total of more than 300 words. The first chapter of this paper describes the research ideas, introduces the current situation of domestic research, and explains the innovation of this paper. In the second chapter, the author introduces the basic theory of expert helper in criminal procedure, and introduces the concept of expert helper in criminal procedure and the difference of related concepts as well as the value of its existence. Through this chapter, the author gives a preliminary introduction to the criminal procedure expert aided person system. The third chapter of this paper introduces the foreign relevant expert assistant system. In this part, the technical consultant system in Italy, the expert system in Russia and the auxiliary system in Japan are introduced. Through the introduction and evaluation of the related systems, this paper compares the similarities and differences of the three countries' related systems and the advantages and disadvantages of the systems, so that our country can get a good enlightenment in the process of constructing the relevant systems. The fourth chapter of this paper mainly explains the current legislative situation and existing problems of the expert assistant system of criminal procedure in our country. Through analyzing these problems, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to improve the system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 陳斌;王路;;論我國(guó)刑事訴訟中的專家輔助人及其制度構(gòu)建[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年01期

2 黃學(xué)賢;;行政訴訟中的專家輔助人制度及其完善[J];法學(xué);2008年09期

3 胡美騰;劉潔;王金姣;常林;;專家輔助人中立性芻議[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年13期

本文編號(hào)：2457410