律師參與社會矛盾化解的路徑研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-04-02 04:35
【摘要】：今年是我國改革開放的第36年，隨著改革的進一步深化，積極地化解社會矛盾，是最大限度地激發(fā)社會創(chuàng)造活力、最大限度地增加和諧因素和減少不和諧因素、最大限度地化消極因素為積極因素的重要途徑。而目前運用三大調解機制在化解社會矛盾進程中又往往存在著各自的不足，律師恰恰是能夠彌補這些不足中重要的一環(huán)。在這一背景下，，對律師如何參與三大調解機制，進而化解社會矛盾的路徑研究就顯得非常重要。 本文對社會矛盾的主要表現(xiàn)與成因進行分析，并剖析了社會矛盾的主要幾類化解途徑所存在的優(yōu)勢和不足之處。通過對不同矛盾化解模式案例的分析，歸納出目前律師在參與矛盾過程中所存在的問題，提出解決的思路和原則。同時從制度構建、經費落實以及作用擴大等方面設計出一套相對完整的、具有普遍性意義的機制框架，為三大調解制度從根本上更好的預防、化解社會矛盾提供對策建議。
[Abstract]:This year is the 36th year of China's reform and opening-up. With the further deepening of reform, actively resolving social contradictions is to maximize social creativity, increase harmony factors and reduce disharmony factors to the maximum extent. Maximize the negative factors as an important way of positive factors. At present, the three mediation mechanisms often have their own shortcomings in the process of resolving social contradictions. Lawyers are just one of the important links that can make up for these deficiencies. Under this background, it is very important to study how lawyers participate in the three mediation mechanisms to resolve social contradictions. This paper analyzes the main manifestations and causes of social contradictions, and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the main solutions to social contradictions. By analyzing the cases of different modes of resolving contradictions, this paper sums up the problems existing in the process of lawyers' participation in contradictions, and puts forward the ideas and principles for solving them. At the same time, a set of relatively complete and universal mechanism framework is designed from the aspects of system construction, funds implementation and function expansion, which provides countermeasures and suggestions for the three mediation systems to prevent and resolve social conflicts fundamentally and better.
【學位授予單位】：上海交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D926.5
本文編號：2452246
[Abstract]:This year is the 36th year of China's reform and opening-up. With the further deepening of reform, actively resolving social contradictions is to maximize social creativity, increase harmony factors and reduce disharmony factors to the maximum extent. Maximize the negative factors as an important way of positive factors. At present, the three mediation mechanisms often have their own shortcomings in the process of resolving social contradictions. Lawyers are just one of the important links that can make up for these deficiencies. Under this background, it is very important to study how lawyers participate in the three mediation mechanisms to resolve social contradictions. This paper analyzes the main manifestations and causes of social contradictions, and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the main solutions to social contradictions. By analyzing the cases of different modes of resolving contradictions, this paper sums up the problems existing in the process of lawyers' participation in contradictions, and puts forward the ideas and principles for solving them. At the same time, a set of relatively complete and universal mechanism framework is designed from the aspects of system construction, funds implementation and function expansion, which provides countermeasures and suggestions for the three mediation systems to prevent and resolve social conflicts fundamentally and better.
【學位授予單位】：上海交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D926.5
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 范愉;淺談當代“非訴訟糾紛解決”的發(fā)展及其趨勢[J];比較法研究;2003年04期
2 李云雄;;關于司法調解與人民調解銜接問題的研究[J];中國司法;2008年03期
3 孔德勤;;積極發(fā)揮律師在化解社會矛盾中的職能作用[J];中國司法;2010年11期
4 姜國兵;孫永怡;;廣州市公民參與公共政策的路徑研究[J];廣東行政學院學報;2010年04期
5 韋長偉;;沖突化解中的第三方干預研究綜述[J];甘肅理論學刊;2011年02期
6 胡俊華,葛天博,謝艷華;ADR制度中國化之路徑解析[J];河北建筑科技學院學報(社科版);2005年03期
7 胡海;胡志英;;構建“三調聯(lián)動”機制的實踐與思考[J];湖湘論壇;2011年02期
8 景漢朝,盧子娟;經濟審判方式改革若干問題研究[J];法學研究;1997年05期
9 鄧樂;李文婷;;淺議律師化解社會矛盾的積極作用[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學院學報;2012年03期
10 楊大路;楊福祿;;新形勢下地方政府社會維穩(wěn)的行為邏輯及其治理[J];理論導刊;2013年06期
本文編號：2452246
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2452246.html
