【摘要】：辯護(hù)律師的調(diào)查取證制度是刑事訴訟公平正義的重要保障,也是被追訴人辯護(hù)權(quán)得以實(shí)現(xiàn)的關(guān)鍵。它是對無罪推定原則、控辯平衡原理、程序正義理論以及有效辯論理論的踐行,其在維護(hù)犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的訴訟權(quán)益方面有著深刻的意義。雖在2012年,刑事訴訟法對該制度進(jìn)行了一定程度上的修改,但是,現(xiàn)有的規(guī)定仍然存在一些缺陷,具體問題表現(xiàn)在如下幾個方面：調(diào)查取證方式得以實(shí)現(xiàn)的法律保障不健全；辯護(hù)律師申請調(diào)查取證被申請人范圍的局限性；辯護(hù)律師自身面臨一定的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)等,這都是現(xiàn)存辯護(hù)律師調(diào)查取證制度的弊端。通過對域外國家的立法考察,發(fā)現(xiàn)域外國家在辯護(hù)律師調(diào)查取證制度的具體構(gòu)建上有著諸多值得借鑒之處,在完善我國辯護(hù)律師調(diào)查制度時,在符合我國語境的前提下,可以適當(dāng)借鑒先進(jìn)立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)。最后,在該制度完善的具體設(shè)想上,筆者認(rèn)為,首先,我國應(yīng)當(dāng)設(shè)立調(diào)查令制度,確立刑事調(diào)查令申請與審批程序。其次,應(yīng)當(dāng)明確辯護(hù)律師在偵查階段的調(diào)查取證權(quán)。最后,應(yīng)當(dāng)確立刑事辯護(hù)豁免制度。
[Abstract]:The investigation and evidence collection system of defense counsel is the important guarantee of fairness and justice in criminal procedure, and also the key to the realization of the right of defense of the accused. It is the practice of the principle of presumption of innocence, the principle of balance between prosecution and defense, the theory of procedural justice and the theory of effective debate. It has profound significance in safeguarding the rights and interests of criminal suspects and defendants in litigation. Although in 2012, the criminal procedure law has modified the system to a certain extent, there are still some shortcomings in the existing regulations, which are reflected in the following aspects: the legal safeguards to be realized in the way of investigation and evidence collection are not sound; The limitation of defense lawyer's application for investigating and obtaining evidence, the limitation of defense lawyer's own legal risk and so on, are the disadvantages of the existing defense counsel's investigation and evidence collection system. Through the legislative investigation of the extraterritorial countries, it is found that the extraterritorial countries have a lot to learn from in the concrete construction of the defense counsel investigation and evidence collection system, while perfecting the defense counsel investigation system in our country, under the premise of accord with the context of our country, The advanced legislative experience can be used for reference. Finally, on the concrete assumption of perfecting the system, the author thinks that, firstly, our country should set up the investigation order system and establish the procedure of application and examination and approval of the criminal investigation order. Secondly, we should make clear the defense lawyer's right to investigate and collect evidence in the investigation stage. Finally, the system of immunity from criminal defence should be established.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王令;關(guān)于設(shè)立“律師執(zhí)業(yè)案件追訴立案聽證審查程序”的立法建議[J];中國司法;2000年06期

2 劉淑君;;刑事辯護(hù)律師調(diào)查取證權(quán)的憲法分析[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年06期

3 包獻(xiàn)榮;;律師調(diào)查取證權(quán)研究——以新《刑事訴訟法》為視角[J];法制與社會;2012年36期

4 金佳英;;偵查階段律師調(diào)查證權(quán)問題研究[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年08期

5 周冬雪;;論刑事訴訟辯護(hù)律師的調(diào)查取證權(quán)[J];才智;2014年14期

6 王楷;;律師調(diào)查取證權(quán)的定性與保障[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

7 薛向楠;;偵查階段律師調(diào)查取證權(quán)研究[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期

8 甄貞;鄭瑞平;;論辯護(hù)律師申請調(diào)查取證權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];河南社會科學(xué);2013年11期

9 王宇;;逮捕階段控辯結(jié)構(gòu)均衡化保障機(jī)制探究——以逮捕階段律師辯護(hù)權(quán)保障為視角[J];中國檢察官;2014年03期

10 褚寧;;構(gòu)建偵查階段辯護(hù)律師調(diào)查取證權(quán)的建議[J];河南社會科學(xué);2014年03期

，

本文編號：2445581