【摘要】：訴訟救濟(jì)具有滯后性的特點(diǎn),而保全制度具有保證生效判決執(zhí)行或者減少當(dāng)事人其他損害的功能,因此保全在現(xiàn)實(shí)中得到越來越多的適用,但是,隨之而來的是保全申請(qǐng)錯(cuò)誤賠償案件的增多。我國法律中對(duì)保全申請(qǐng)錯(cuò)誤賠償問題的規(guī)定并不清晰,對(duì)賠償責(zé)任歸責(zé)原則適用、賠償范圍等都沒有明確規(guī)定,司法實(shí)踐中存在判決不一的現(xiàn)象。因此對(duì)于該類問題有深入研究的必要。除引言和結(jié)語外,全文共分五個(gè)部分,主要內(nèi)容如下： 在第一部分,筆者選取了兩則典型案例,對(duì)爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了歸納,并就學(xué)者對(duì)此爭(zhēng)議的不同觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行分析,提出了解決爭(zhēng)議的方法——以保全制度中的利益平衡及我國侵權(quán)責(zé)任法歸責(zé)原則適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)為路徑。 在第二部分,筆者對(duì)保全制度的含義、特征等方面做了闡述,主要目的是為了探究保全制度中對(duì)保全雙方的利益衡量。 在第三部分,基于第二部分的分析,結(jié)合我國侵權(quán)責(zé)任法上不同歸責(zé)原則適用時(shí)對(duì)當(dāng)事人雙方權(quán)益保護(hù)的價(jià)值取向,對(duì)保全申請(qǐng)錯(cuò)誤賠償責(zé)任歸責(zé)原則作出應(yīng)適用無過錯(cuò)歸責(zé)原則的判斷,并對(duì)構(gòu)成要件進(jìn)行探討。 在第四部分,筆者從管轄、訴訟當(dāng)事人、證明責(zé)任分配、賠償范圍及承擔(dān)、訴訟時(shí)效等方面對(duì)保全申請(qǐng)錯(cuò)誤損失賠償案件的審理程序作了分析。 在第五部分,筆者從預(yù)防保全申請(qǐng)錯(cuò)誤損失賠償案件的發(fā)生,更好的保護(hù)被申請(qǐng)入利益的角度,對(duì)完善保全申請(qǐng)制度給出自己的建議。
[Abstract]:The litigation relief has the characteristic of lag, and the preservation system has the function of guaranteeing the effective execution of the judgment or reducing the other damages of the parties. Therefore, preservation has been more and more applied in reality, but, What follows is the increase in the number of erroneous compensation cases for preservation applications. There is no clear stipulation in the law of our country on the wrong compensation for preservation application, the application of liability imputation principle, the scope of compensation, etc., and there are different judgments in judicial practice. Therefore, it is necessary to study this kind of problems in depth. Besides the introduction and conclusion, the full text is divided into five parts. The main contents are as follows: in the first part, the author selects two typical cases, summarizes the focus of the dispute, and analyzes the different viewpoints of the scholars on the dispute. This paper puts forward a method to solve the dispute-taking the balance of interests in the preservation system and the principle of liability imputation in tort law as the path. In the second part, the author expounds the meaning and characteristics of the preservation system, the main purpose is to explore the preservation of the interests of both parties in the preservation system to measure the interests. In the third part, based on the analysis of the second part, combined with the value orientation of the protection of the rights and interests of both parties in the application of different imputation principles in the tort liability law of our country, The principle of no-fault imputation should be applied to the principle of liability imputation for the wrong compensation of preservation application, and the constituent elements are discussed. In the fourth part, from jurisdiction, litigant, distribution of burden of proof, scope and commitment of compensation, limitation of action and other aspects, the author analyzes the procedure of the case of protection application for incorrect loss compensation. In the fifth part, the author puts forward his own suggestion to perfect the system of preservation application from the point of view of preventing the occurrence of the wrong loss compensation case of preservation application and better protecting the interests of the applicant.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1;D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭小冬;;論保全訴訟中被申請(qǐng)人利益的保障[J];法學(xué)家;2010年02期

2 黃文藝;;比較法視域下我國民事保全制度的修改與完善[J];比較法研究;2012年05期

3 冀宗儒;徐輝;;論民事訴訟保全制度功能的最大化[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2013年01期

4 浙江省高級(jí)人民法院課題組;俞新堯;;從合法性關(guān)注到合理性考量 能動(dòng)司法視角下財(cái)產(chǎn)保全司法對(duì)策之優(yōu)化[J];法律適用;2011年12期

5 H·G·博威格;N·多考夫;N·楊森;張抒涵;;中國的新侵權(quán)責(zé)任法[J];比較法研究;2012年02期

6 陳河;;論財(cái)產(chǎn)保全錯(cuò)誤的損害賠償問題[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

7 劉勇;;侵權(quán)法上之損害[J];南京大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2005年01期

8 翁曉斌;;程序利益保障論[J];南京大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2010年02期

9 張斌;論現(xiàn)代立法中的利益平衡機(jī)制[J];清華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年02期

10 劉長(zhǎng)玉;張曉寧;;財(cái)產(chǎn)保全復(fù)議制度之重構(gòu)[J];山東審判;2011年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2430710