【摘要】：以往學界認為,我國民事訴訟法要求的立案登記積極要件"門檻高",然而,在現行立案登記制模式下,這種解讀已不適宜�，F行民事訴訟立法上的立案積極要件是可以解釋的,也是可以適用的。司法現實中的"立案難"問題并不能歸咎于立法。未來我國民事訴訟法對立案登記積極要件修訂時,立法者應考慮到盡早過濾無法律利益的訴、兼顧訴訟解紛的固有界限、秉持寬容的立案受理理念的外部因素。由此留下的解紛真空,則可通過訟外解紛機制的構建和完善來填補。
[Abstract]:In the past, scholars thought that the positive requirement of civil procedure law is "high threshold", however, under the current registration system, this interpretation is not appropriate. The positive elements of filing a case in the current civil procedure legislation can be explained and applied. The problem of filing a case in judicial reality cannot be attributed to legislation. In the future, when the positive elements of filing and registration are revised in our civil procedure law, legislators should take into account the early filtering of lawsuits without legal interests, take into account the inherent limits of resolving disputes in litigation, and uphold the external factors of the concept of accepting the case with tolerance. The vacuum left by this can be filled by the construction and perfection of the mechanism of resolving disputes outside litigation.
【作者單位】： 北京航空航天大學法學院;
【分類號】：D925.1

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 ;紀念《民事訴訟法》頒行十周年學術研討會在京召開[J];中國律師;2001年05期

2 蔡彥敏;張s，

本文編號：2429766