論訴訟參與人救濟(jì)權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)
發(fā)布時間：2019-02-24 11:24
【摘要】：救濟(jì)，，其本意是指幫助某人脫離危險或擺脫困境的意思。在法律范疇內(nèi)，是指行為人的某種正當(dāng)權(quán)利遭到非法侵犯時，通過某種手段改正、矯正或補(bǔ)救。訴訟參與人的救濟(jì)權(quán)利是指整個刑事訴訟過程中，訴訟參與人在行使權(quán)利時，遭到公安機(jī)關(guān)、檢察機(jī)關(guān)、法院及其有關(guān)工作人員不當(dāng)限制或侵犯，有權(quán)依法向有關(guān)司法機(jī)關(guān)提出申訴、控告，并請求相關(guān)司法機(jī)關(guān)處理的行為。救濟(jì)權(quán)按性質(zhì)可分為兩類：一類是非訴訟性的救濟(jì)權(quán)又叫審前救濟(jì)，是指訴訟參與人遭受到公安機(jī)關(guān)、檢察機(jī)關(guān)、法院及其工作人員違反法律規(guī)定程序，剝奪、限制、侵害訴訟參與人權(quán)利時，有權(quán)向有關(guān)機(jī)關(guān)尋求救濟(jì)的權(quán)利。處理這類救濟(jì)是一種行政行為。另一類是訴訟性的救濟(jì)，這種救濟(jì)主要是對司法機(jī)關(guān)在訴訟過程中所作的判決、裁定不服而提起的，它由申訴事件而引起的，因此對這類申訴事件的處理是一種訴訟行為，即刑訴法中規(guī)定的再審程序或?qū)徟斜O(jiān)督程序。 本文所要探討的救濟(jì)權(quán)是上述所說的第一類非訴訟性的救濟(jì)。本文分為三個章節(jié)對訴訟參與人救濟(jì)權(quán)利進(jìn)行研究：第一章主要是對刑事救濟(jì)權(quán)的概述。講述了刑事救濟(jì)權(quán)的概念、特征、刑事救濟(jì)權(quán)的意義和訴訟參與人的概念和范圍。第二章主要介紹我國現(xiàn)行刑事訴訟參與人救濟(jì)權(quán)的問題與原因。主要分析我國現(xiàn)行刑事訴訟參與人救濟(jì)權(quán)存在的問題以及訴訟參與人救濟(jì)權(quán)問題原因分析。第三章主要介紹我國現(xiàn)行訴訟參與人刑事救濟(jì)權(quán)的完善。本文由淺入深分析了現(xiàn)行刑事訴訟法關(guān)于訴訟參與人救濟(jì)權(quán)存在的問題及原因，并對相關(guān)問題提出了完善建議，其分析也有許多不足之處，在此算是拋磚引玉了。
[Abstract]:Relief is meant to help someone out of danger or difficulty. In the scope of law, it refers to the correction, correction or remedy by some means when the legitimate rights of the perpetrator are infringed unlawfully. The remedy right of the litigant refers to the improper restriction or violation by the public security organ, the procuratorial organ, the court and its related staff in the exercise of the rights of the litigant during the whole criminal proceedings. Shall have the right to lodge a complaint or complaint with the relevant judicial organ in accordance with the law, and to request the relevant judicial organ to handle the act. According to its nature, the right of relief can be divided into two categories: one is the non-litigant right of relief, also called pretrial relief, which means that the participants in the proceedings are deprived and restricted by the public security organs, procuratorial organs, courts and their staff in violation of the procedures prescribed by law. The right to seek redress from the relevant authorities when infringing upon the rights of the litigant participants. Handling such remedies is an administrative act. The other is procedural relief, which is mainly brought against decisions made by the judicial authorities in the course of the proceedings. It is caused by appeals. Therefore, the handling of such appeals is an act of litigation. That is, the procedure of retrial or trial supervision stipulated in the Criminal procedure Law. The right of relief discussed in this paper is the first kind of non-litigation relief mentioned above. This paper is divided into three chapters: the first chapter is the summary of criminal relief right. This paper describes the concept and characteristics of the right of criminal remedy, the meaning of the right of criminal remedy and the concept and scope of the participants in the proceedings. The second chapter mainly introduces the problems and reasons of the current criminal procedure participant's right of relief in our country. This paper mainly analyzes the problems existing in the relief right of the present criminal procedure participants and the causes of the relief rights of the participants in the criminal proceedings in our country. The third chapter mainly introduces the perfection of criminal relief right of current litigant participants in our country. This paper analyzes the existing problems and reasons of the current Criminal procedure Law on the right to relief for participants in litigation, and puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of the relevant problems. There are many deficiencies in the analysis.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川省社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2
本文編號：2429506
[Abstract]:Relief is meant to help someone out of danger or difficulty. In the scope of law, it refers to the correction, correction or remedy by some means when the legitimate rights of the perpetrator are infringed unlawfully. The remedy right of the litigant refers to the improper restriction or violation by the public security organ, the procuratorial organ, the court and its related staff in the exercise of the rights of the litigant during the whole criminal proceedings. Shall have the right to lodge a complaint or complaint with the relevant judicial organ in accordance with the law, and to request the relevant judicial organ to handle the act. According to its nature, the right of relief can be divided into two categories: one is the non-litigant right of relief, also called pretrial relief, which means that the participants in the proceedings are deprived and restricted by the public security organs, procuratorial organs, courts and their staff in violation of the procedures prescribed by law. The right to seek redress from the relevant authorities when infringing upon the rights of the litigant participants. Handling such remedies is an administrative act. The other is procedural relief, which is mainly brought against decisions made by the judicial authorities in the course of the proceedings. It is caused by appeals. Therefore, the handling of such appeals is an act of litigation. That is, the procedure of retrial or trial supervision stipulated in the Criminal procedure Law. The right of relief discussed in this paper is the first kind of non-litigation relief mentioned above. This paper is divided into three chapters: the first chapter is the summary of criminal relief right. This paper describes the concept and characteristics of the right of criminal remedy, the meaning of the right of criminal remedy and the concept and scope of the participants in the proceedings. The second chapter mainly introduces the problems and reasons of the current criminal procedure participant's right of relief in our country. This paper mainly analyzes the problems existing in the relief right of the present criminal procedure participants and the causes of the relief rights of the participants in the criminal proceedings in our country. The third chapter mainly introduces the perfection of criminal relief right of current litigant participants in our country. This paper analyzes the existing problems and reasons of the current Criminal procedure Law on the right to relief for participants in litigation, and puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of the relevant problems. There are many deficiencies in the analysis.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川省社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 李建明;;關(guān)于刑事訴訟參與人控告權(quán)保障制度立法的思考[J];法商研究;2008年05期
2 王莉;行政視野中公民申訴權(quán)保障問題研究[J];江西社會科學(xué);2005年08期
3 許江;;論刑事訴訟參與人范圍的完善[J];南京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué).人文科學(xué).社會科學(xué)版);2008年05期
4 蘇秦;;律師在刑事訴訟中的權(quán)利保障[J];中共山西省委黨校學(xué)報;2010年05期
5 萬鄂湘;胡云紅;;論刑事被害人訴訟權(quán)利和救濟(jì)制度的完善[J];人民司法;2012年13期
6 熊秋紅;刑事救濟(jì)程序的新發(fā)展[J];中外法學(xué);1996年03期
7 陳瑞華;;非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則的中國模式[J];中國法學(xué);2010年06期
8 龍宗智;論司法改革中的相對合理主義[J];中國社會科學(xué);1999年02期
9 韓旭;;辯護(hù)律師被驅(qū)逐出庭的程序法理思考[J];鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2013年01期
本文編號：2429506
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2429506.html
最近更新
教材專著
