【摘要】：摘要：近年來,我國(guó)社會(huì)現(xiàn)代化建設(shè)欣欣向榮,然而在此過程中由于行政機(jī)關(guān)的不合理甚至是野蠻地行使職權(quán),致使我國(guó)的群體性行政糾紛與日俱增。目前我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的行政訴訟法沒有很好地解決此類糾紛,既有的代表人訴訟制度并沒有發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的作用,使得眾多行政相對(duì)人的合法權(quán)益沒有獲得及時(shí)有效的救濟(jì)。然而,法律不允許制度真空的存在,鑒于目前的實(shí)際狀況,在我國(guó)引進(jìn)德國(guó)行政示范訴訟制度實(shí)有必要。行政示范訴訟制度是一種針對(duì)解決人數(shù)眾多且法律問題或事實(shí)問題大部分相同的群體性行政糾紛的新型的制度。它之所以能夠快速經(jīng)濟(jì)地促進(jìn)群體性糾紛的有效解決,奧妙在于它的示范波及效應(yīng)：即先期選取其中一件或數(shù)件典型案件進(jìn)行公開審理,后期的其它同類案件采用在典型案件中得以明確的共通性的事實(shí)與法律問題結(jié)論,從而達(dá)到快速經(jīng)濟(jì)解決群體糾紛的訴訟目的。 德國(guó)在立法上已建立起行政示范訴訟制度,并且在司法實(shí)踐中取得良好的成效,其豐富的立法和實(shí)務(wù)經(jīng)驗(yàn)為我國(guó)構(gòu)建行政示范訴訟制度提供了良好的素材和參照；目前,我國(guó)已經(jīng)具備引進(jìn)行政示范訴訟制度的各項(xiàng)條件,在我國(guó)構(gòu)建行政示范訴訟制度具有必要性和可行性；為解決日益頻發(fā)的群體性行政糾紛,當(dāng)務(wù)之急應(yīng)在我國(guó)引進(jìn)和建構(gòu)行政示范訴訟制度。與此同時(shí)要處理好它與既存的行政訴訟代表人制度的關(guān)系,是取而代之還是兩者兼存?在具體司法實(shí)務(wù)中,還需探討行政示范訴訟制度的運(yùn)行該采用何種模式,是契約型還是職權(quán)型模式?最后落實(shí)行政示范訴訟制度的具體構(gòu)建,包括其運(yùn)作前提、級(jí)別管轄、第三人權(quán)益保障以及行政示范判決的效力擴(kuò)張等。
[Abstract]:Absrtact: in recent years, the construction of social modernization in our country is flourishing, but in the process, because of the unreasonable and even barbaric exercise of power by administrative organs, the group administrative disputes in our country are increasing day by day. At present, the existing administrative procedure law in our country has not solved this kind of dispute well, the existing representative litigation system has not played its due role, which makes the legal rights and interests of many administrative counterpart not get timely and effective relief. However, the law does not allow the existence of institutional vacuum, in view of the current actual situation, it is necessary to introduce the German administrative model litigation system in our country. The administrative model litigation system is a new type of system which aims at solving the group administrative disputes which have a large number of people and most of the legal or factual problems are the same. The reason why it can quickly and economically promote the effective resolution of group disputes lies in its demonstration ripple effect: one or more of the typical cases are selected for public trial in advance. Other similar cases in the later period adopt the conclusion of the common facts and legal problems which can be clear in the typical cases, so as to achieve the goal of resolving group disputes quickly and economically. Germany has established the administrative model litigation system in legislation, and has achieved good results in judicial practice. Its rich legislative and practical experience has provided good material and reference for the construction of administrative model litigation system in our country. At present, our country already has the various conditions to introduce the administrative model litigation system, it is necessary and feasible to construct the administrative model lawsuit system in our country; In order to solve the increasingly frequent group administrative disputes, it is urgent to introduce and construct the administrative model litigation system in our country. At the same time, we should deal well with the relationship between it and the existing representative system of administrative litigation, whether it should be replaced or both? In the specific judicial practice, it is also necessary to explore what mode should be adopted in the operation of the administrative model litigation system, whether the contractual model or the authority mode? Finally, the concrete construction of the administrative model litigation system is carried out, including its operating premise, level of jurisdiction, protection of the rights and interests of the third party and the expansion of the effectiveness of the administrative model judgment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖建華;群體訴訟與我國(guó)代表人訴訟的比較研究[J];比較法研究;1999年02期

2 劉磊;關(guān)于我國(guó)代表人訴訟制度的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1997年01期

3 肖建國(guó);謝俊;;示范性訴訟及其類型化研究——以美國(guó)、英國(guó)、德國(guó)為對(duì)象的比較法考察[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年01期

4 陳開梓;;論環(huán)境侵權(quán)群體性訴訟處理機(jī)制的完善[J];湖北民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年05期

5 章武生;楊嚴(yán)炎;;我國(guó)群體訴訟的立法與司法實(shí)踐[J];法學(xué)研究;2007年02期

6 劉毅;張谷;;示范訴訟及其在我國(guó)審判實(shí)踐中的運(yùn)用[J];人民司法;2009年11期

7 季衛(wèi)東;;要關(guān)注“試驗(yàn)訴訟”——當(dāng)事人推動(dòng)的制度變遷及其實(shí)證研究[J];司法;2007年00期

8 王福華;;集團(tuán)訴訟代表人資格研究 基于普通法國(guó)家的比較分析[J];中外法學(xué);2009年02期

9 沈宗靈;論法律移植與比較法學(xué)[J];外國(guó)法譯評(píng);1995年01期

10 楊瑞;;示范訴訟制度探析——兼論我國(guó)代表人訴訟制度之完善[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2007年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 鄭妮;示范訴訟制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2405497