行政訴訟集中管轄制度研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-12-26 10:37
【摘要】：對行政訴訟集中管轄制度是多年來全國各級法院行政案件革新工作的重點,也是取得實踐效果及經(jīng)驗最為豐碩的部分。早在2000年,在最高院的主導(dǎo)下部分地區(qū)即開始了集中管轄制度試點工作。2007年浙江省麗水市中級人民法院展開的“相對集中指定管轄制度”的試行工作受到了廣泛關(guān)注,其對反饋效果和相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)的評估與分析,在廣大學(xué)者之間引起了較大反響。在此之后,在最高人民法院的推動下,集中管轄在多地得以推廣試行,取得了較為全面的反饋結(jié)果。而在2014年《行政訴訟法》修改之后,各級法院得以放開手腳,普遍開始在各自轄區(qū)內(nèi)開展行政訴訟集中管轄制度改革工作。本文以深圳市2015年6月開始推行的集中管轄制度改革工作為參照范例,搜集相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)分析,以探究集中管轄制度在實踐中體現(xiàn)的優(yōu)勢以及存在的問題。通過數(shù)據(jù)可以直觀的發(fā)現(xiàn),集中管轄制度確能發(fā)揮阻卻行政不當(dāng)干預(yù)、提升審判效率及專業(yè)性、合理配置司法資源以及同一裁判尺度,提升司法公信力等價值。但同時也存在對當(dāng)事人合法權(quán)益保障力度不足、配套制度不完善、改革不徹底等問題。通過對上述問題的深入分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)通過調(diào)整相應(yīng)措施、降低訴訟成本、構(gòu)建溝通機(jī)制等方式能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)對集中管轄制度的合理完善,這也是本文研究的重點所在。值得注意的是,集中管轄制度是一個過渡性的制度,其最終指向應(yīng)當(dāng)為設(shè)立行政專門法院。因此筆者對行政專門法院設(shè)立的可行性進(jìn)一步加以探討,并針對層級設(shè)置、審判職能結(jié)構(gòu)等方面進(jìn)行了初步的研究,以期對我國行政訴訟審判體系的未來發(fā)展進(jìn)行一些有所裨益的思考。
[Abstract]:The system of centralized jurisdiction over administrative litigation is the focal point of the reform of administrative cases in courts at all levels in China for many years, and it is also the most fruitful part of achieving practical results and experience. As early as 2000, the pilot work of the centralized jurisdiction system began in some areas under the leadership of the Supreme Court. In 2007, the trial work of "relatively centralized designated jurisdiction system" carried out by the Lishui Intermediate people's Court in Zhejiang Province received widespread attention. The feedback effect and related data are systematically evaluated and analyzed, which has caused a great response among scholars. After this, under the promotion of the Supreme people's Court, centralized jurisdiction has been popularized and tried in many places, and more comprehensive feedback results have been obtained. After the revision of the Administrative Litigation Law in 2014, courts at all levels were able to open their hands and hands, and generally began to reform the system of centralized jurisdiction of administrative proceedings in their respective jurisdictions. Taking the reform of the centralized jurisdiction system in Shenzhen in June 2015 as a reference example, this paper collects relevant data for systematic analysis in order to explore the advantages and existing problems of the centralized jurisdiction system in practice. Through the data we can find that centralized jurisdiction system can play the value of hindering the improper intervention of administration, improving the efficiency and professionalism of the trial, allocating the judicial resources and the same judgment standard, enhancing the credibility of the judicature and so on. But at the same time, there are also some problems, such as insufficient protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, imperfect supporting system, incomplete reform and so on. Through the in-depth analysis of the above problems, it is found that by adjusting the corresponding measures, reducing litigation costs, building communication mechanism and other ways can achieve the rational improvement of centralized jurisdiction system, which is also the focus of this study. It is worth noting that the centralized jurisdiction system is a transitional system, and its ultimate direction should be the establishment of special administrative courts. Therefore, the author further discusses the feasibility of the establishment of special administrative courts, and makes a preliminary study on the establishment of hierarchy and the structure of judicial functions. With a view to the future development of our country's administrative litigation trial system for some beneficial thinking.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：深圳大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.3
本文編號：2391973
[Abstract]:The system of centralized jurisdiction over administrative litigation is the focal point of the reform of administrative cases in courts at all levels in China for many years, and it is also the most fruitful part of achieving practical results and experience. As early as 2000, the pilot work of the centralized jurisdiction system began in some areas under the leadership of the Supreme Court. In 2007, the trial work of "relatively centralized designated jurisdiction system" carried out by the Lishui Intermediate people's Court in Zhejiang Province received widespread attention. The feedback effect and related data are systematically evaluated and analyzed, which has caused a great response among scholars. After this, under the promotion of the Supreme people's Court, centralized jurisdiction has been popularized and tried in many places, and more comprehensive feedback results have been obtained. After the revision of the Administrative Litigation Law in 2014, courts at all levels were able to open their hands and hands, and generally began to reform the system of centralized jurisdiction of administrative proceedings in their respective jurisdictions. Taking the reform of the centralized jurisdiction system in Shenzhen in June 2015 as a reference example, this paper collects relevant data for systematic analysis in order to explore the advantages and existing problems of the centralized jurisdiction system in practice. Through the data we can find that centralized jurisdiction system can play the value of hindering the improper intervention of administration, improving the efficiency and professionalism of the trial, allocating the judicial resources and the same judgment standard, enhancing the credibility of the judicature and so on. But at the same time, there are also some problems, such as insufficient protection of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, imperfect supporting system, incomplete reform and so on. Through the in-depth analysis of the above problems, it is found that by adjusting the corresponding measures, reducing litigation costs, building communication mechanism and other ways can achieve the rational improvement of centralized jurisdiction system, which is also the focus of this study. It is worth noting that the centralized jurisdiction system is a transitional system, and its ultimate direction should be the establishment of special administrative courts. Therefore, the author further discusses the feasibility of the establishment of special administrative courts, and makes a preliminary study on the establishment of hierarchy and the structure of judicial functions. With a view to the future development of our country's administrative litigation trial system for some beneficial thinking.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：深圳大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李杰;張傳毅;;行政案件集中管轄模式初探:理論定位與實踐選擇[J];法律適用;2014年05期
2 郭修江;;行政訴訟集中管轄問題研究——《關(guān)于開展行政案件相對集中管轄試點工作的通知》的理解與實踐[J];法律適用;2014年05期
3 鄧娜;;論我國探索建立與行政區(qū)劃相分離的司法管轄制度——以美國法院和我國海事法院體制為分析視角[J];廣西社會主義學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年01期
4 解志勇;;行政法院:行政訴訟困境的破局之策[J];政法論壇;2014年01期
5 曹紅軍;王迎;;行政訴訟相對集中管轄的法理分析[J];安徽理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2014年01期
6 王春業(yè);;論行政訴訟案件的相對集中管轄[J];山東科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2013年06期
7 江必新;;中國行政審判體制改革研究——兼論我國行政法院體系構(gòu)建的基礎(chǔ)、依據(jù)及構(gòu)想[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2013年04期
8 章志遠(yuǎn);;行政案件相對集中管轄制度之省思[J];法治研究;2013年10期
9 耿寶建;;再談中國是否應(yīng)當(dāng)設(shè)立行政法院[J];上海政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(法治論叢);2013年03期
10 江必新;;完善行政訴訟制度的若干思考[J];中國法學(xué);2013年01期
，本文編號：2391973
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2391973.html
最近更新
教材專著
