【摘要】：隨著社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)不斷發(fā)展,民事糾紛的數(shù)量與類型與日俱增,司法面臨著前所未有的壓力。在這一背景下,以方便訴訟為主題的新一輪司法改革在全球范圍內(nèi)展開,小額訴訟程序應(yīng)運(yùn)而生并得到較快發(fā)展。近年來(lái),我國(guó)司法機(jī)關(guān)特別是基層法院面臨案多人少、效率低下的突出矛盾,為尋求解決途徑,我國(guó)學(xué)習(xí)和借鑒美國(guó)、日本等國(guó)實(shí)行小額訴訟程序的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn),在2012年新修訂的《民事訴訟法》中首次引入小額訴訟制度,并自2013年1月起在全國(guó)基層法院推行小額訴訟程序。 正文內(nèi)容主要包括五個(gè)部分： 第一部分,小額訴訟程序概述。此部分介紹了小額訴訟程序產(chǎn)生的相關(guān)背景,小額訴訟程序的概念內(nèi)涵,并且將其與簡(jiǎn)易程序、小額速裁機(jī)制等類似的程序機(jī)制做了比較區(qū)分,闡釋了完善小額訴訟程序的理論基礎(chǔ)以及功能定位。 第二部分,小額訴訟程序的比較研究。此部分重點(diǎn)介紹了美國(guó)、英國(guó)、日本和我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)小額訴訟程序的立法及實(shí)踐情況,并對(duì)其共性進(jìn)行了歸納。 第三部分,我國(guó)現(xiàn)行立法特點(diǎn)。此部分介紹我國(guó)小額訴訟程序的立法特點(diǎn),并作了評(píng)述。 第四部分,小額訴訟程序的實(shí)證分析。此部分著重在南京市基層法院的調(diào)研內(nèi)容上,從調(diào)研所得中發(fā)現(xiàn)和歸納問(wèn)題,并對(duì)小額訴訟程序?qū)嵤┬Ч焕硐氲脑蜻M(jìn)行了分析。 第五部分,我國(guó)小額訴訟程序的完善。此部分為本文的重點(diǎn)部分,根據(jù)實(shí)際情況并借鑒國(guó)外先進(jìn)立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),對(duì)小額訴訟程序的具體程序設(shè)計(jì)提出了完善建議。
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy and the increasing number and type of civil disputes, the judiciary is facing unprecedented pressure. In this context, a new round of judicial reform with the theme of convenient litigation has been carried out in the world, and the small claims procedure has emerged as the times require and developed rapidly. In recent years, the judicial organs of our country, especially the basic level courts, are faced with the prominent contradiction of the large number of cases and low efficiency. In order to find a solution, our country has learned and learned from the successful experiences of the United States, Japan and other countries in the implementation of small claims proceedings. The small claims system was introduced for the first time in the newly revised Code of Civil procedure in 2012, and the small claims procedure has been implemented in the basic courts of the country since January 2013. The main body includes five parts: the first part, the summary of small claims procedure. This part introduces the relevant background of the small claims procedure, the concept connotation of the small claims procedure, and compares it with the summary procedure, the small amount quick adjudication mechanism and so on similar procedure mechanism. It explains the theoretical basis and function orientation of perfecting the small claims procedure. The second part, the comparative study of small claims procedure. This part mainly introduces the legislation and practice of small claims procedure in the United States, Britain, Japan and Taiwan, and sums up its generality. The third part, China's current legislative characteristics. This part introduces the legislative characteristics of small claims procedure in China, and makes a comment. The fourth part, the empirical analysis of small claims procedure. This part focuses on the research content of the basic court of Nanjing, finds and induces the problems from the investigation results, and analyzes the reasons why the effect of the small claims procedure is not satisfactory. The fifth part, the consummation of the small claims procedure in our country. This part is the key part of this paper, according to the actual situation and foreign advanced legislative experience, the author puts forward some suggestions to improve the procedure design of the small claims procedure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬強(qiáng);;美國(guó)小額法庭制度與借鑒[J];比較法研究;2011年05期

2 熊躍敏;日本民事訴訟中的小額訴訟程序概述──兼論我國(guó)小額訴訟程序的構(gòu)建[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年05期

3 范愉;;司法資源供求失衡的悖論與對(duì)策 以小額訴訟為切入點(diǎn)[J];法律適用;2011年03期

4 齊樹潔;;小額訴訟:從理念到規(guī)則[J];海峽法學(xué);2013年01期

5 袁春蘭;兩大法系小額訴訟程序的比較分析[J];河北法學(xué);2005年04期

6 鄒郁卓;;英國(guó)小額訴訟程序改革的最新進(jìn)展及其啟示[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年01期

7 章武生;簡(jiǎn)易、小額訴訟程序與替代性程序之重塑[J];法學(xué)研究;2000年04期

8 汪靜;;臺(tái)灣地區(qū)小額訴訟程序及啟示[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2013年09期

9 劉敏;;論非訟法理在小額訴訟程序中的適用[J];清華法學(xué);2011年03期

10 傅郁林;;小額訴訟與程序分類[J];清華法學(xué);2011年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2388239