【摘要】：附帶上訴制度是大陸法系民事訴訟體系中的重要制度。主要的幾個(gè)大陸法系國(guó)家和地區(qū)的民事訴訟法典中均規(guī)定了附帶上訴,而在我國(guó)的民事訴訟法中則是缺位的。本文將梳理各國(guó)或地區(qū)的法典中附帶上訴制度的立法體例，探討附帶上訴制度的法理基礎(chǔ)，研究域外附帶上訴制度的程序規(guī)制，，結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)具體實(shí)踐，探析附帶上訴制度在我國(guó)本土化的具體程序構(gòu)建，以完善我國(guó)的民事訴訟法體系。 本文除引言與結(jié)語(yǔ)外，正文分為三個(gè)部分，共計(jì)3萬(wàn)余字。 第一部分論述了附帶上訴制度的立法體例與法理基礎(chǔ)。從各國(guó)和地區(qū)的法院組織系統(tǒng)和上訴制度的連結(jié)中，引出附帶上訴制度的各種立法體例，以第二審中的附帶上訴制度為對(duì)象，對(duì)其概念進(jìn)行定位，以上訴說(shuō)與非上訴說(shuō)兩個(gè)學(xué)說(shuō)為切入點(diǎn)探討附帶上訴制度的性質(zhì)，奠定了附帶上訴制度本質(zhì)乃是上訴的的論點(diǎn)，進(jìn)而從武器平等、訴訟公平、訴訟經(jīng)濟(jì)三方面，對(duì)附帶上訴制度的目的進(jìn)行了分析。 第二部分探討了域外附帶上訴制度的程序規(guī)制。對(duì)附帶上訴制度的前提、當(dāng)事人適格、內(nèi)容、期限、提出程式等程序規(guī)則進(jìn)行了仔細(xì)的梳理，剖析了被上訴人的上訴被處理過(guò)和舍棄附帶上訴權(quán)兩種情形的處理方法，并且探討了如何對(duì)附帶上訴進(jìn)行審理與判決。 第三部分論探討了我國(guó)附帶上訴制度的程序構(gòu)建。從附帶上訴制度與上訴利益、二審審查范圍、不利益變更禁止原則三者的關(guān)系論述了附帶上訴制度的可行性，從平等保護(hù)雙方當(dāng)事人的需要和抑制不合理上訴的需要論證了附帶上訴的必要性，進(jìn)而借鑒各國(guó)或地區(qū)的立法規(guī)定，并結(jié)合我國(guó)實(shí)際的立法規(guī)定、司法環(huán)境以及訴訟理念，論證了如何構(gòu)建符合我國(guó)國(guó)情的民事附帶上訴制度。
[Abstract]:Incidental appeal system is an important system in civil litigation system of civil law system. Incidental appeal is stipulated in the civil procedure code of several countries and regions of continental law system, but it is absent in our country's civil procedure law. This paper will comb the legislative system of incidental appeal system in the codes of various countries or regions, discuss the legal basis of incidental appeal system, study the procedural regulation of extraterritorial incidental appeal system, and combine with the specific domestic practice. In order to perfect the system of civil procedure law, this paper probes into the concrete procedure construction of the system of incidental appeal in our country. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the text is divided into three parts, a total of 30,000 words. The first part discusses the legislative style and legal basis of appellate system. From the connection of the court organization system and the appeal system of various countries and regions, this paper introduces the various legislative styles of the incidental appeal system, taking the incidental appeal system in the second instance as the object, and positioning its concept. The above two theories are the starting point to explore the nature of the incidental appeal system, which establishes the argument that the nature of the incidental appeal system is an appeal, and then from the three aspects of weapon equality, litigation fairness, litigation economy, The purpose of the incidental appeal system is analyzed. The second part discusses the procedural regulation of extraterritorial incidental appeal system. The premise of the system of incidental appeal, the suitability of the parties, the content, the time limit, the procedure and other procedural rules are carefully combed, and the methods of handling the appellee's appeal have been dealt with and the appellants' rights of incidental appeal have been abandoned are analyzed. And discussed how to carry on the trial and the judgment to the incidental appeal. The third part discusses the procedure construction of China's incidental appeal system. This paper discusses the feasibility of the incidental appeal system from the relationship between the system of incidental appeal and the interest of appeal, the scope of the second instance review, and the principle of prohibition of no change of interest. From the needs of equal protection of both parties and the need to suppress unreasonable appeals, this paper demonstrates the necessity of incidental appeals, and then draws lessons from the legislative provisions of various countries or regions, and combines with the actual legislative provisions, judicial environment and litigation concepts of our country. It demonstrates how to construct the civil incidental appeal system in accordance with the national conditions of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 章武生,楊嚴(yán)炎;德國(guó)民事訴訟制度改革之評(píng)析[J];比較法研究;2003年01期

2 宋漢林;;論我國(guó)民事附帶上訴制度的構(gòu)建[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年02期

3 鄭世保,李朝龍;論附帶上訴[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年11期

4 胡軍輝;;論民事上訴利益要件[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年06期

5 邵明;;訴訟標(biāo)的論[J];法學(xué)家;2001年06期

6 吳如巧;;第二審上訴模式的演變及對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];法治研究;2009年09期

7 顏萌;;論民事上訴權(quán)的限制[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2012年01期

8 許尚豪;;上訴審糾錯(cuò)功能的法律思考——以法院層級(jí)關(guān)系為分析視角[J];河北法學(xué);2008年04期

9 趙旭東;;民事上訴審查制度研究[J];河北法學(xué);2012年01期

10 吳昊;;比較法視野下的民事上訴審價(jià)值分析[J];湖北廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年07期

本文編號(hào)：2377159