【摘要】：刑訊逼供雖然從封建社會的“合法”演化到現(xiàn)在社會的“非法”,但當今社會仍然難以將其根除,刑訊逼供不僅嚴重侵害犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的人權(quán),而且造成了大量的冤假錯案,影響司法權(quán)威。黨的十八大重點討論依法治國問題,將依法治國納入國家重大問題來探討。因此,在依法治國理論的指導下,為減少冤假錯案的發(fā)生,在司法實踐中必須徹底摒棄刑訊逼供問題,犯罪嫌疑人的基本人權(quán)才能得到保障。公權(quán)力的存在是一把雙刃劍,在刑事訴訟領(lǐng)域公權(quán)力的合理利用,能夠保護犯罪嫌疑人的基本人權(quán)。本文筆者立足于我國當前司法現(xiàn)狀將從以下三個方面來論述刑訊逼供產(chǎn)生的原因和預防對策。首先,通過對不同學者有關(guān)刑訊逼供定義進行比較分析,闡述刑訊逼供的概念和特征,對刑訊逼供的現(xiàn)狀進行概括,并結(jié)合熱點錯案分析刑訊逼供造成的危害。其次,對刑訊逼供產(chǎn)生的原因進行重點闡述,從傳統(tǒng)觀念的影響、訴訟制度的不健全、立法領(lǐng)域的缺陷、司法領(lǐng)域的諸多問題四個方面分析刑訊逼供產(chǎn)生的原因。從刑訊逼供的危害和產(chǎn)生的原因分析,可以看出制止刑訊逼供將是一項長期而艱巨的任務(wù),需要采取綜合治理的手段。最后,對于遏制刑訊逼供提出對策,包括樹立社會主義法治理念,更深一層地改善刑事訴訟制度,完善遏制刑訊逼供的相關(guān)立法,創(chuàng)造良好的司法環(huán)境。
[Abstract]:Although extorting confessions by torture evolved from "legality" in feudal society to "illegal" in present society, it is still difficult to eradicate it in today's society. Extorting confessions by torture not only seriously infringes the human rights of criminal suspects and defendants, And caused a large number of false cases, affecting judicial authority. The 18th National Congress of the Party focuses on governing the country according to law and bringing the rule of law into the major issue of the country. Therefore, under the guidance of the theory of governing the country according to law, in order to reduce the occurrence of miscarriage of justice, the problem of extorting confessions by torture must be completely abandoned in judicial practice so that the basic human rights of criminal suspects can be guaranteed. The existence of public power is a double-edged sword. The rational use of public power in the field of criminal procedure can protect the basic human rights of criminal suspects. Based on the current judicial situation in China, the author will discuss the causes and preventive measures of extorting confessions by torture from the following three aspects. First of all, through the comparative analysis of different scholars about the definition of extorting confessions by torture, this paper expounds the concept and characteristics of extorting confessions by torture, generalizes the present situation of extorting confessions by torture, and analyzes the harm caused by extorting confessions by torture in combination with hot and wrong cases. Secondly, the reasons of extorting confessions by torture are expounded, and the causes of extorting confessions by torture are analyzed from four aspects: the influence of traditional concepts, the imperfection of litigation system, the defects in the field of legislation, and many problems in the field of judicature. From the analysis of the harm and causes of extorting confessions by torture, it can be seen that stopping the extortion by torture will be a long-term and arduous task, and it is necessary to adopt the means of comprehensive treatment. Finally, some countermeasures are put forward, including the establishment of socialist concept of the rule of law, the further improvement of the criminal procedure system, the improvement of relevant legislation to curb torture, and the creation of a good judicial environment.
【學位授予單位】：煙臺大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賓凌;;控辯平等視野下我國偵查程序之構(gòu)建[J];湘南學院學報;2015年01期

2 肖良平;;借鑒兩大法系立法成果,完善我國刑事審判認證制度[J];考試周刊;2015年07期

3 葉景遠;林騰龍;;“疑罪從無”原則實踐困境與出路——以刑事審判權(quán)的運行為視角[J];福建法學;2014年04期

4 何家弘;;認定錯判的程序和標準[J];人民檢察;2013年18期

5 陳杰;;沉默權(quán)不再沉默——有限沉默權(quán)推動刑事訴訟改革[J];湖北警官學院學報;2012年10期

6 楊小寧;;試論對刑訊逼供的檢察監(jiān)督機制[J];中國刑事法雜志;2012年04期

7 趙秉志;張偉珂;;刑訊逼供罪若干問題研究——以趙作�！肮室鈿⑷恕痹┌笧橐暯荹J];南都學壇;2011年03期

8 陳光中;;我國偵查階段律師辯護制度之完善[J];中國司法;2010年07期

9 歐春燕;;論刑訊逼供的產(chǎn)生原因及控制對策[J];湖南社會科學;2009年05期

10 李昌盛;;邊沁對沉默權(quán)的批判及其啟示[J];前沿;2009年02期

，

本文編號：2336438