【摘要】：行政立案登記制度在2015年頒布的《行政訴訟法》中被首次確立,標志著我國行政訴訟立案制度進入全新的時代。2017年1月,在實踐中創(chuàng)立輝煌成績的立案登記制度,也同時出現(xiàn)了許多的問題。雖然登記制度大尺度地緩解了“立案難”問題,但制度本身以及實踐中暴露的問題不容忽視:登記制度本身無明確的理論支撐,各人民法院對起訴條件的審查標準不一,實際操作模棱兩可;法院貫策執(zhí)行立案登記制度的同時缺乏監(jiān)督機制,權(quán)力得不到監(jiān)督;缺乏相應(yīng)的制度與之相配套;當(dāng)事人濫訴等等。因此在立法和司法實踐過程中需要不斷地完善行政立案登記制度,以期最大限度保護當(dāng)事人訴權(quán)。論文由四個部分組成:第一章:行政訴訟立案登記制度概述。在明確制度相關(guān)概念之后,對立案登記制度在我國確立的背景進行簡單介紹。對域外的立案制度進行學(xué)習(xí),提出有益的借鑒點。最后提出支撐我國確立絕對立案登記制度的相關(guān)理論基礎(chǔ)。第二章;構(gòu)建行政訴訟立案登記制度的原因以及期望實現(xiàn)的目標。在對原有的制度進行剖析不足的基礎(chǔ)上尋找問題所在,并對此改革后實現(xiàn)的目標進行梳理探討。第三章:我國行政訴松立案登記制度之問題研究。通過數(shù)據(jù)搜集、文獻參考等方式,汲取國內(nèi)學(xué)者相關(guān)觀點,分析行政訴訟立案登記制度存在的問題。第四章:我國行政訴訟立案登記制度之完善。針對本文第三章中提出的行政立案登記制度在立法和司法方面存在的缺陷,如立案缺乏監(jiān)督等問題,分別提出一些改革建議。
[Abstract]:The administrative filing registration system was established for the first time in the Administrative Litigation Law promulgated in 2015, which marks the entry of a new era in China's administrative litigation filing system. In January 2017, the registration system with brilliant achievements was created in practice. At the same time, there are many problems. Although the registration system has alleviated the problem of "filing a case" on a large scale, the problems exposed in the system itself and in practice should not be ignored: the registration system itself has no clear theoretical support, and various people's courts have different standards for the examination of the conditions for prosecution. The actual operation is ambiguous; the court carries out the system of filing and registration at the same time the lack of supervision mechanism, the power can not be supervised; the lack of corresponding system to match it; the parties overappeal and so on. Therefore, in the process of legislation and judicial practice, it is necessary to continuously improve the administrative registration system in order to protect the litigants' right of action to the maximum extent. The thesis consists of four parts: chapter one: an overview of the registration system of administrative proceedings. After clarifying the relevant concepts of the system, the background of the establishment of the registration system in China is briefly introduced. To carry on the study to the extraterritorial filing system, put forward the beneficial reference point. Finally, it puts forward the relevant theoretical basis to support the establishment of absolute registration system in China. The second chapter: the reasons for the establishment of administrative litigation registration system and the desired objectives. On the basis of the analysis of the original system, the problem is found, and the goal after the reform is combed and discussed. Chapter three: research on the registration system of administrative litigation. Through data collection, literature reference and so on, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the registration system of administrative litigation by drawing on the relevant viewpoints of domestic scholars. Chapter four: the perfection of the registration system of administrative litigation in our country. In view of the defects of the administrative registration system in the third chapter, such as the lack of supervision, some reform suggestions are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 王春業(yè);;論行政訴訟的登記立案制度——兼評新行政訴訟法相關(guān)條款[J];北京社會科學(xué);2015年11期

2 包劍平;;實行立案登記制 依法保障當(dāng)事人訴權(quán)——民事訴訟法司法解釋解讀[J];人民司法;2015年11期

3 紀格非;;論我國民事起訴狀的功能轉(zhuǎn)型與內(nèi)容再造[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2013年06期

4 肖建華;;論惡意訴訟及其法律規(guī)制[J];中國人民大學(xué)學(xué)報;2012年04期

5 胡建淼;唐震;;行政訴訟調(diào)解、和解抑或協(xié)調(diào)和解——基于經(jīng)驗事實和規(guī)范文本的考量[J];政法論壇;2011年04期

6 張海濱;;濫用訴權(quán)及其法律規(guī)制研究[J];廈門大學(xué)法律評論;2005年01期

7 嚴戈 ,屈國華;改革法院司法統(tǒng)計結(jié)案率指標的思考[J];中國統(tǒng)計;2003年05期

8 陳醇;論國家的義務(wù)[J];法學(xué);2002年08期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前3條

1 楊翔 ;谷國文;江華;;落實立案登記制 保障當(dāng)事人訴權(quán)[N];人民法院報;2015年

2 李娜;;立案登記保障立案不受法外因素干擾[N];法制日報;2015年

3 姜啟波;;人民法院立案審查制度的必要性與合理性[N];人民法院報;2005年

，

本文編號：2282539