【摘要】：2012年修正后重新頒布施行的《刑事訴訟法》在其規(guī)定的特別程序一編中確立了“當事人和解的公訴案件訴訟程序”，該程序開創(chuàng)了我國刑事和解入律的先章，標志著我國以恢復(fù)性司法為理念的刑事和解制度法制化進程取得階段性成果。但是，刑事訴訟法典對公訴案件當事人和解程序只是作出抽象規(guī)制，且能夠涉及的領(lǐng)域非常狹窄。從該項程序的實際運行和未來的領(lǐng)域拓展要求出發(fā)，我們還有許多工作需要去探索完成。本論文擬從探索刑事和解程序在我國的運行路徑出發(fā)，研究刑事和解的具體實施方案，使該項程序發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的功能和作用。本文將從以下四個方面論證論文議題： 第一章：我國刑事和解路徑概述。本章主要闡述刑事和解的一般原理、法律特征；介紹我國刑事解紛模式從傳統(tǒng)的民間私了到官方主導(dǎo)調(diào)解再到官民結(jié)合刑事和解的歷史嬗變，并指出，在刑事訴訟法典已經(jīng)創(chuàng)設(shè)官民結(jié)合的當事人和解程序的前提下，如何探索其在訴訟各階段的運行方式，以尋求具體的和解路徑；同時，剖析刑事和解的價值，強調(diào)刑事和解是利益契合的最佳途徑，是提高司法效率的主要捷徑，是構(gòu)建和諧司法的有效路徑。 第二章：本章分析當前我國刑事和解程序運行存在理念障礙和現(xiàn)實障礙，分析社會中所存在的有關(guān)刑事和解的負面評價即觀念上的障礙，分析所謂“花錢買刑”觀念的癥結(jié)所在及其對實體公正質(zhì)疑的現(xiàn)實影響；同時，，又分析了刑事和解有違訴訟基本原則，弱化訴權(quán)的程序正當性的質(zhì)疑。關(guān)于現(xiàn)實障礙，論文提示主要表現(xiàn)為被告方當事人賠償力不足，刑事和解方案和法律沖突等方面。 第三章：刑事和解路徑域外考察。分別考察英美法系、大陸法系國家的刑事和解程序運行路徑。英美法系以英國、美國為域外考察對象，大陸法系則以法國、德國為主，對比兩種路徑模式，并從借鑒域外經(jīng)驗的立場出發(fā)，強調(diào)結(jié)合中國本土實際國情社情探索刑事和解程序的具體運行路徑，方是域外考察之本意。 第四章：探索我國刑事和解程序的具體運行路徑。構(gòu)建中國特色的刑事和解模式，分兩部分論證：首先闡述了具體運行程序的指導(dǎo)思想，強調(diào)從秉持中國特色社會主義法治理念、公正與效率兼顧理念、堅持程序正義理念出發(fā)，同時借鑒在西方國家已經(jīng)有闡述經(jīng)驗的恢復(fù)性司法理念，確立具體路徑的構(gòu)建原則。其次，從所考察的國內(nèi)一些刑事和解路徑的探索性經(jīng)驗出發(fā)，介紹檢察機關(guān)在審查起訴階段的檢調(diào)對接路徑，法院在庭前會議中的訴調(diào)對接路徑，同時分析了刑事和解程序與附帶民事訴訟程序的銜接路徑，并探索偵查階段開展刑事和解工作的可行性。
[Abstract]:The Criminal procedure Law, which was repromulgated and implemented after the amendment in 2012, established the "Proceedings in Public Prosecution cases for the settlement of the parties" in the first part of the special procedures stipulated in the Criminal procedure Law, which created the first chapter of the criminal reconciliation law in our country. It marks the achievement of the legal process of criminal reconciliation system based on restorative justice in our country. However, the criminal procedure code only abstractly regulates the procedure of party reconciliation in public prosecution cases, and the fields involved are very narrow. In view of the actual operation of the program and the requirements of future domain expansion, we still have a lot of work to explore and complete. This paper intends to explore the path of criminal reconciliation procedure in our country, study the specific implementation of criminal reconciliation program, so that the procedure to play its due function and role. This paper will demonstrate the topic from the following four aspects: chapter one: summary of the path of criminal reconciliation in China. This chapter mainly expounds the general principle and legal characteristics of criminal reconciliation, introduces the historical evolution of the pattern of criminal dispute resolution in China from traditional folk private mediation to official mediation and then to the combination of official and civil criminal reconciliation, and points out that, On the premise that the procedure of reconciliation between the officials and the people has been established in the Code of Criminal procedure, how to explore its operation mode in each stage of the lawsuit in order to seek the concrete settlement path, and at the same time, to analyze the value of the criminal reconciliation, It is emphasized that criminal reconciliation is the best way to match interests, the main shortcut to improve judicial efficiency, and the effective way to construct harmonious judicature. Chapter two: this chapter analyzes the ideological and practical obstacles in the operation of the criminal reconciliation procedure in China, and analyzes the negative evaluation of the criminal reconciliation in the society, that is, the obstacles in the concept. This paper analyzes the crux of the concept of "spending money to buy punishment" and its realistic influence on the challenge of substantive justice, and also analyzes the doubt that criminal reconciliation violates the basic principles of litigation and weakens the procedural legitimacy of the right of action. About the realistic obstacle, the paper mainly indicates that the defendant party's compensation ability is insufficient, the criminal settlement scheme and the law conflict and so on. Chapter three: the extraterritorial investigation of the path of criminal reconciliation. This paper investigates the operation path of criminal reconciliation procedure in Anglo-American law system and civil law system respectively. The Anglo-American law system takes Britain and the United States as the object of overseas investigation, while the civil law system focuses on France and Germany, contrasting the two path models, and proceeding from the standpoint of learning from the foreign experience. It is emphasized that it is the original intention of extra-territorial investigation to explore the specific operating path of criminal reconciliation procedure combining with the actual situation of China. Chapter four: explore the concrete operation path of criminal reconciliation procedure in our country. To construct the criminal reconciliation model with Chinese characteristics, there are two parts of argumentation: first of all, the guiding ideology of concrete operation procedure is expounded, emphasizing the idea of upholding the socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics, giving consideration to justice and efficiency, and insisting on the idea of procedural justice. At the same time, draw lessons from the western countries have elaborated the experience of restorative justice concept, the establishment of specific path construction principles. Secondly, from the exploratory experience of some domestic criminal reconciliation paths investigated, this paper introduces the docking paths of procuratorial organs in the stage of examination and prosecution, and the docking paths of the court in the pre-court meeting. At the same time, it analyzes the connection path between the criminal reconciliation procedure and the incidental civil procedure, and explores the feasibility of the criminal reconciliation in the investigation stage.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 熊健奎;淺析我國精神損害賠償?shù)奶攸c[J];當代法學(xué);2003年09期

2 時恒支;時方;;刑事和解與刑法基本原則的沖突分析及制度構(gòu)建[J];法律適用;2012年02期

3 甄貞;申飛飛;;附帶民事訴訟的困境與出路——以刑事和解為視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年10期

4 莊緒龍;;刑事和解保障論[J];法治研究;2010年08期

5 董邦俊;李希慧;;偵查階段刑事和解適用研究[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年06期

6 謝麗珍;劉宏武;;附帶民事訴訟制度的進一步完善——以我國新《刑事訴訟法》為視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年07期

7 李翔;;重罪案件刑事和解與刑法基本原則的價值沖突及融合[J];北方法學(xué);2013年05期

8 陳光中;;刑事和解的理論基礎(chǔ)與司法適用[J];人民檢察;2006年10期

9 姚建濤;;刑事和解制度的價值分析[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;2007年03期

本文編號：2272730