【摘要】：紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察機(jī)關(guān)是我國反腐敗機(jī)構(gòu)之一,在反腐體系中處于領(lǐng)導(dǎo)核心地位。無論是違紀(jì)還是違法,都需要證據(jù),證據(jù)是證實一切違法違紀(jì)的強(qiáng)力武器。紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察證據(jù)就是違紀(jì)證據(jù),刑事證據(jù)就是違法證據(jù),分別根據(jù)紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察機(jī)關(guān)和檢察機(jī)關(guān)的不同職能采取不同收集方式收集證據(jù)。在當(dāng)前反腐敗斗爭新的大形勢下,隨著紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察機(jī)關(guān)與檢察機(jī)關(guān)辦案協(xié)作機(jī)制的不斷健全和完善,經(jīng)常相互移交證據(jù),在檢察機(jī)關(guān)移交給紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察機(jī)關(guān)案件來說,針對司法機(jī)關(guān)移送的案件材料和證據(jù)材料,紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察機(jī)關(guān)幾乎予以采信,不存在證據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)化問題。然而,紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察機(jī)關(guān)移交檢察機(jī)關(guān)案件材料和證據(jù)材料,卻無法順利轉(zhuǎn)化為刑事證據(jù),而是經(jīng)過多重的鑒別和區(qū)分才可以轉(zhuǎn)化。幾年來,專家學(xué)者都在研究紀(jì)檢證據(jù)如何轉(zhuǎn)化為刑事證據(jù),最終都沒有結(jié)果。無法順利轉(zhuǎn)化證據(jù)的原因正是法律對刑事證據(jù)規(guī)定更為嚴(yán)格規(guī)范,法律的權(quán)威性任何人均無法超越。由于紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察機(jī)關(guān)不是法律規(guī)定的取證主體,受到法律法規(guī)的制約,紀(jì)檢證據(jù)無法順利轉(zhuǎn)化為刑事證據(jù)。本文繼續(xù)對證據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)化中出現(xiàn)的問題進(jìn)行探討。本文第一部分首先對紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察證據(jù)進(jìn)行論述。該部分包括紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察證據(jù)的概念、內(nèi)容及其形式。同時論述刑事證據(jù)的概念、內(nèi)容及其形式,以及與紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察證據(jù)的區(qū)別;第二部分主要是個人對紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察證據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)化刑事證據(jù)的必要性與可行性進(jìn)行分析。該部分包括紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察證據(jù)在司法活動中起到的重要作用,并通過反向思維證實紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察證據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)化刑事證據(jù)的必要性,以及現(xiàn)今我國對監(jiān)察制度的改革試點(diǎn)進(jìn)一步推動了紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察證據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)化刑事證據(jù)的進(jìn)程。這是本文的重點(diǎn)之一。第三部分對紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察證據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)化為刑事訴訟證據(jù)的現(xiàn)狀及原因分析。該部分主要是證明紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察證據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)化為刑事證據(jù)的困難性,和刑事證據(jù)主要在實物證據(jù)和言詞證據(jù)、鑒定結(jié)論轉(zhuǎn)尋找突破口。第四部分主要研究紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察證據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)化刑事證據(jù)存在問題的對策。該部分主要紀(jì)檢監(jiān)察證據(jù)和刑事證據(jù)之間的轉(zhuǎn)化所需的對策。同時可參照港澳的做法,完善我國國內(nèi)證據(jù)能力的不足。
[Abstract]:Discipline inspection and supervision organ is one of the anti-corruption organizations in our country, and is in the leading core position in the anti-corruption system. Evidence is needed, both in violation of discipline and in violation of discipline. Evidence is a powerful weapon to prove any violation of discipline. Discipline inspection evidence is evidence of violation of discipline, criminal evidence is illegal evidence, according to the different functions of discipline inspection and supervision organs and procuratorial organs to collect evidence in different ways. Under the new general situation of the current anti-corruption struggle, with the continuous improvement and perfection of the cooperation mechanism between discipline inspection and procuratorial organs in handling cases, evidence is often handed over to each other. In the case of procuratorial organs transferred to discipline inspection and supervision organs, According to the case materials and evidence materials transferred by the judicial organs, discipline inspection and supervision organs almost accept the information, and there is no question of evidence conversion. However, the documents and evidence materials transferred by discipline inspection and supervision organs to procuratorial organs cannot be transformed into criminal evidence smoothly, but can only be transformed through multiple discriminations and distinctions. For several years, experts and scholars have been studying how disciplinary evidence can be transformed into criminal evidence. The reason why the evidence can not be transformed smoothly is that the law prescribes more strict norms of criminal evidence, and no one can surpass the authority of the law. As discipline inspection and supervision organ is not the subject of evidence collection stipulated by law and restricted by laws and regulations, discipline inspection evidence can not be transformed into criminal evidence smoothly. This article continues to discuss the problems in the conversion of evidence. The first part of this paper discusses the evidence of discipline inspection and supervision. This part includes the concept, content and form of discipline inspection and supervision evidence. At the same time, it discusses the concept, content and form of criminal evidence, as well as the difference between criminal evidence and discipline inspection evidence. The second part mainly analyzes the necessity and feasibility of the transformation of discipline inspection and supervision evidence into criminal evidence. This part includes the important role that discipline inspection and supervision evidence plays in judicial activities, and proves the necessity of transforming discipline inspection and supervision evidence into criminal evidence through reverse thinking. And the reform of supervision system in our country has further promoted the process of transforming discipline inspection and supervision evidence into criminal evidence. This is one of the key points of this paper. The third part analyzes the current situation and reasons of the transformation of disciplinary inspection evidence into criminal procedure evidence. This part is mainly to prove the difficulty of transforming discipline inspection and supervision evidence into criminal evidence, and the criminal evidence mainly lies in physical evidence and verbal evidence. The fourth part mainly studies the countermeasures of the problems existing in the transformation of discipline inspection and supervision evidence into criminal evidence. This part mainly inspects and supervises the evidence and the criminal evidence transformation needs the countermeasure. At the same time, we can refer to the practice of Hong Kong and Macao to improve our domestic evidentiary capacity.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張富文;關(guān)于建立我國刑事證據(jù)出示規(guī)則的構(gòu)想[J];沈陽建筑工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年01期

2 謝立志;;試論刑事證據(jù)的審查[J];云夢學(xué)刊;2007年S1期

3 吳明凱;;論“兩類”案件刑事證據(jù)的運(yùn)用[J];中國西部科技;2008年24期

4 宋志軍;;論刑事證據(jù)場域及其構(gòu)造[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年03期

5 王牧;論刑事證據(jù)的法律性[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;1983年06期

6 涂克明;;略論刑事證據(jù)的本質(zhì)特征[J];中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;1987年04期

7 茅青;李潔;;刑事證據(jù)判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的再思考[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1991年06期

8 陳浩銓 ,黃道;論刑事證據(jù)理論的唯物論基礎(chǔ)[J];政法論壇;1993年03期

9 周平;刑事證據(jù)閉合性新探[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1994年05期

10 陳浩銓;論刑事證據(jù)的幾個重要特性[J];上海大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1995年04期

相關(guān)會議論文 前7條

1 楊衛(wèi)國;;電子數(shù)據(jù)作為刑事證據(jù)的歸類問題研究[A];第十九次全國計算機(jī)安全學(xué)術(shù)交流會論文集[C];2004年

2 楊衛(wèi)國;;試析電子數(shù)據(jù)作為刑事證據(jù)的有關(guān)問題[A];第十八次全國計算機(jī)安全學(xué)術(shù)交流會論文集[C];2003年

3 陳浩銓;;刑事證據(jù)一分為三論[A];當(dāng)代中國：發(fā)展·安全·價值——第二屆（2004年度）上海市社會科學(xué)界學(xué)術(shù)年會文集 （上）[C];2004年

4 曹雪蓮;;略談法律推定在刑事證據(jù)中的運(yùn)用[A];法律邏輯與法律思維——第十七屆全國法律邏輯學(xué)術(shù)討論會交流論文[C];2009年

5 尤巖松;;淺論爆炸實驗在涉爆案件中的刑事證據(jù)作用[A];公共安全中的化學(xué)問題研究進(jìn)展（第三卷）[C];2013年

6 張雯;;論刑事證據(jù)的合法性及其完善[A];第二屆貴州法學(xué)論壇文集[C];2001年

7 安國江;;試論我國刑事證據(jù)交換程序[A];貴州省2004年刑法學(xué)年會論文集[C];2004年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 魯檢研;刑事證據(jù)：亟待立法完善[N];檢察日報;2000年

2 北京市東城區(qū)人民檢察院 李慶磊;準(zhǔn)確把握行政證據(jù)與刑事證據(jù)的銜接[N];檢察日報;2014年

3 記者 李娉邋通訊員 黎江 方明 鄧海洋;政法部門加強(qiáng)刑事證據(jù)工作[N];咸寧日報;2007年

4 記者 聶敏寧 通訊員 孫 波 馬益迅;規(guī)范刑事證據(jù)工作[N];人民法院報;2005年

5 山東省泰安市人民檢察院 戴軍　葉叢中;刑事證據(jù)展示應(yīng)解決兩個問題[N];檢察日報;2009年

6 天津市塘沽區(qū)人民檢察院 張力軍;刑事證據(jù)展示的五個問題[N];檢察日報;2010年

7 蒯化平 審計署京津冀特派辦;審計證據(jù)向刑事證據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)化淺探[N];中國審計報;2013年

8 杜敬波 杜佳蓉 河北省晉州市環(huán)保局 河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)管理學(xué)院;環(huán)境行政證據(jù)如何向刑事證據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)化？[N];中國環(huán)境報;2014年

9 周曼華;淺談對刑事證據(jù)合法性的審查[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報;2000年

10 劉裕國;四川規(guī)范刑事證據(jù)工作[N];人民日報;2005年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 宋志軍;刑事證據(jù)契約論[D];中國政法大學(xué);2008年

2 熊志海;刑事證據(jù)研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 黃維;對刑事證據(jù)采納和采信的研究[D];云南大學(xué);2012年

2 劉家磊;論刑事證據(jù)的性質(zhì)[D];安徽大學(xué);2013年

3 張穎異;行政證據(jù)轉(zhuǎn)化為刑事證據(jù)的立法完善[D];遼寧大學(xué);2015年

4 林海偉;刑事證據(jù)印證方法的定位、困境與化解[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年

5 徐睿;論走私犯罪認(rèn)定中行政證據(jù)向刑事證據(jù)的轉(zhuǎn)換[D];東南大學(xué);2015年

6 顏娟;論刑事證據(jù)裁判原則的適用[D];安徽大學(xué);2017年

7 郝s，

本文編號：2261866