刑事審判變更管轄制度研究
[Abstract]:The jurisdiction of trial in criminal proceedings refers to the jurisdiction of the people's court for the first instance of the criminal case, not only the division of the jurisdiction between the people's courts of different levels, but also the division between the people's courts at the same level and between the special courts and ordinary courts. Therefore, the problem to be solved by the trial jurisdiction is that, when a criminal case has occurred, which one of the courts of the first instance of the case is specifically undertaken following the investigation and prosecution stages. As the beginning of criminal trial activity, trial jurisdiction is of great significance to the whole criminal lawsuit activity. The jurisdiction system of the Criminal Procedure Law of our country determines the first instance court by level and region, in which case the court of the case can be allocated reasonably in such a way. However, in some exceptional cases, the trial of the case by a court otherwise governed would lead to a fair and impartial hearing or a serious impact on the efficiency of the judiciary, which would then need to be dealt with, which was the purpose of the establishment of a change jurisdiction. Throughout the world, the change jurisdiction system of many developed countries has been perfect, and there are still many defects and deficiencies in our country's current change jurisdiction system. Among them, the relevant provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law are not sufficiently detailed, the operability is not strong, and the lack of further detailed judicial interpretation is also included. Therefore, the criminal trial change jurisdiction system needs to be further improved. On the basis of consulting relevant literature and analyzing the specific typical cases, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the existing change jurisdiction system, and puts forward its own ideas and suggestions for perfecting the jurisdiction system of criminal trial change in our country. First, the change jurisdiction refers to a system which transfers the original first instance case to another court through legal procedure under special circumstances, which is the redistribution of the jurisdiction of the first instance of the criminal case. In terms of status, the change of jurisdiction system is the modification and supplement of the statutory jurisdiction system. The change jurisdiction system is the necessary supplement to the avoidance system, and plays an important role in safeguarding the judicial justice and protecting human rights. Secondly, the factors that govern the application of the governing system are also varied. We mainly consider the nature and impact of the case, the trial environment of the case, the established investigative jurisdiction and the judicial capacity and the judicial resources. In the face of these special circumstances, the original statutory jurisdiction is very difficult to ensure that the judges are in an impartial position, and therefore we need to change the established jurisdiction to allow the trial of the case to proceed in an objective and impartial environment. Once again, the change jurisdiction system plays a very important role in practice, but its defects and deficiencies are also very obvious. Among them, the administrative color of the hierarchical jurisdiction is too strong, and it is applicable to the reduction of the judicial efficiency and the waste of judicial resources in various places. It is also obvious that the designated jurisdiction defect is also very obvious, the lack of participation of the parties, the single application type, the ambiguity of the relationship between the reconnaissance jurisdiction and the unclear reasons are also required to be solved. These problems, on the one hand, are too vague as a result of the law-related law, and on the other hand, due to the lack of detailed judicial interpretation. Finally, from guaranteeing the judicial justice and guaranteeing human rights as the core, adopting the mode of legislation, perfecting and refining the obscure places in the existing system. aiming at the defects and problems that the change jurisdiction system is exposed in the judicial practice, perfecting and modifying, modifying the articles inconsistent with the constitution spirit, defining the relation between the jurisdiction of the investigation and the jurisdiction, the conditions for initiating the change jurisdiction, and reconstructing the starting mode of the change jurisdiction, In order to guarantee the participation of defenders, the author puts forward his own opinions, and thinks from the angle of the prosecution and the defense angle, perfect the right to participate in the designated jurisdictional procedure, establish the corresponding relief procedure, and play a better role in the change jurisdiction.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2018
【分類號】:D925.2
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 沈開舉;方澗;;行政訴訟異地管轄制度實(shí)證研究——以河南模式為樣本[J];河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期
2 李倩文;;論民事訴訟應(yīng)訴管轄制度[J];商;2016年13期
3 張宇;;我國應(yīng)訴管轄制度的反思與重構(gòu)[J];法學(xué)論壇;2017年01期
4 李善川;;民事訴訟提級管轄制度的探索與規(guī)范[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年04期
5 黃強(qiáng);申超越;;軍事法院民事案件管轄制度的完善[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年03期
6 樂山市中級人民法院課題組;;關(guān)于行政案件管轄制度的調(diào)查與思考——以樂山法院相對集中管轄為樣本[J];中共樂山市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2015年05期
7 佴澎;劉亞虹;;清代西南少數(shù)民族民事糾紛解決管轄制度研究[J];云南行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期
8 朱麗珍;仲穎;;行政程序中的管轄制度芻議[J];河南公安高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期
9 崔更國;李培志;;關(guān)于行政訴訟管轄制度的思考[J];石家莊鐵路職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期
10 廖萬春,戴佛明;執(zhí)行管轄制度的現(xiàn)狀與重構(gòu)[J];人民司法;1998年11期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前9條
1 石愚;;我國行政訴訟異地管轄制度疑與探[A];第三屆西部律師發(fā)展論壇論文集[C];2010年
2 吳在存;霍振宇;;跨行政區(qū)劃法院設(shè)置與管轄制度研究[A];深化司法改革與行政審判實(shí)踐研究(上)——全國法院第28屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募痆C];2017年
3 劉之瑋;黃晨;;回歸測試:行政案件跨區(qū)域管轄制度的追求與衍化——以異地交叉指定管轄的區(qū)域性實(shí)踐為樣本[A];深化司法改革與行政審判實(shí)踐研究(下)——全國法院第28屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募痆C];2017年
4 包繼來;;論防治海洋船源污染的管轄制度[A];《聯(lián)合國海洋法公約》生效十周年暨海事管理研討會(huì)論文集[C];2004年
5 關(guān)俊;鄭想門;黃萬斌;;原點(diǎn)與歸宿:行政案件異地管轄制度的思辨——5年來S市法院行政案件異地管轄的反思[A];全國法院第25屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募汗痉ㄅc行政法實(shí)施問題研究(下冊)[C];2013年
6 萬宗瓚;;論反壟斷民事訴訟中的法院管轄[A];“決策論壇——企業(yè)行政管理與創(chuàng)新學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)”論文集(上)[C];2016年
7 張輝;;論環(huán)保法庭管轄——以知識產(chǎn)權(quán)審判庭為借鑒[A];2014 年《環(huán)境保護(hù)法》的實(shí)施問題研究——2015 年全國環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研討會(huì)(年會(huì))論文集[C];2015年
8 羅梓榆;;司法改革背景下行政審判職權(quán)的分化與整合——以當(dāng)前“一干多支”的管轄現(xiàn)狀為視角[A];深化司法改革與行政審判實(shí)踐研究(下)——全國法院第28屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募痆C];2017年
9 劉國紅;;生態(tài)環(huán)境保護(hù)案件跨區(qū)集中審理研究——以貴州黔南中院為視角[A];貴州法學(xué)(2014年第11期)[C];2014年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 俞朝鳳 李斌 嚴(yán)波;執(zhí)行管轄制度的修改及完善[N];人民法院報(bào);2005年
2 耿輝邋成君;管轄制度改革破解“民告官”難題[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2007年
3 記者 賈明會(huì) 通訊員 李建軍;深化管轄制度改革 推進(jìn)嚴(yán)格公正司法[N];人民法院報(bào);2014年
4 中國人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授 博士生導(dǎo)師 中國法學(xué)會(huì)行政法學(xué)研究會(huì)副會(huì)長 楊建順;完善管轄制度要注重既有資源[N];檢察日報(bào);2014年
5 北京科技大學(xué)副教授 肖建國;管轄制度與當(dāng)事人制度的重構(gòu)[N];人民法院報(bào);2004年
6 陳永輝;推進(jìn)管轄制度改革 探索協(xié)調(diào)處理機(jī)制[N];人民法院報(bào);2007年
7 記者 左超;我省即將實(shí)施異地管轄制度[N];云南日報(bào);2016年
8 張有義邋胡新橋;“民告官”案件異地管轄制度尋求實(shí)質(zhì)突破[N];法制日報(bào);2007年
9 課題組成員 危輝星 馬良驥;探索管轄制度改革 杜絕地方行政干預(yù)[N];人民法院報(bào);2012年
10 孫茜;改革管轄制度 維護(hù)公民環(huán)境權(quán)益[N];人民法院報(bào);2015年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 王宜欣;論行政訴訟跨區(qū)域管轄制度[D];安徽大學(xué);2018年
2 楊震;行政訴訟跨行政區(qū)域管轄的實(shí)證考察[D];南京大學(xué);2018年
3 錢林梓;刑事審判變更管轄制度研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2018年
4 李倩文;民事訴訟應(yīng)訴管轄制度比較研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2017年
5 柯賢星;行政訴訟跨區(qū)域管轄制度研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2017年
6 姜月;行政訴訟管轄制度的完善[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2017年
7 崔榮欣;比較法視野下我國應(yīng)訴管轄制度的完善[D];遼寧大學(xué);2016年
8 呂昌燦;刑事審判變更管轄制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年
9 盧柔辰;基層人民法院行政訴訟管轄制度研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年
10 張學(xué)銳;我國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)法院管轄制度研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2015年
,本文編號:2257757
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2257757.html