【摘要】：認(rèn)罪協(xié)商制度起源于辯訴交易,旨在提高訴訟效率,解決“案多人少”的矛盾。構(gòu)建認(rèn)罪協(xié)商制度是彌補(bǔ)我國現(xiàn)行刑事從寬制度缺陷、提高訴訟效率、實(shí)現(xiàn)特殊預(yù)防刑罰目的、完善“認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰從寬制度”、推進(jìn)“審判中心主義”改革的需要。我國傳統(tǒng)協(xié)商文化、當(dāng)事人主義訴訟模式及司法實(shí)踐為該制度的構(gòu)建提供了可能。構(gòu)建我國的認(rèn)罪協(xié)商制度應(yīng)遵循合法、自愿、兼顧公平與效率及法院審查的原則,該制度排除特殊罪名及重罪的適用,限于量刑協(xié)商,必須達(dá)到案件事實(shí)清楚,證據(jù)確實(shí)、充分的證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn),控辯雙方、被害人、法官均享有程序參與權(quán),但被害人和法官沒有程序啟動權(quán),制度適用于審查起訴及檢察官提起訴訟后法院開庭審理前的階段,法院通過公開開庭審理對協(xié)商內(nèi)容進(jìn)行審查。認(rèn)罪協(xié)商案件被告人享有有限上訴權(quán),被害人有權(quán)對協(xié)商內(nèi)容提出異議,檢察機(jī)關(guān)有權(quán)撤回協(xié)商。確立沉默權(quán)、證據(jù)開示制度、完善法律援助制度是被追訴人協(xié)商自愿性、明智性、真實(shí)性的保障,是認(rèn)罪協(xié)商制度存在和發(fā)展的前提。
[Abstract]:Plea bargaining system originates from plea bargaining, which aims to improve the efficiency of litigation and solve the contradiction of "more cases than fewer people". The construction of plea bargaining system is necessary to make up for the defects of the current criminal leniency system in China, to improve the efficiency of litigation, to achieve the purpose of special preventive punishment, to perfect the lenient system of guilty plea and punishment, and to promote the reform of "trial centrism". The traditional negotiation culture, litigant litigation mode and judicial practice provide the possibility for the construction of this system. To construct the plea bargaining system of our country should follow the principles of legality, voluntary, fairness and efficiency, and court review. This system excludes the application of special charges and felonies, and is limited to sentencing negotiation. It must be clear in the facts of the case and the evidence is true. Adequate standards of proof, in which both the prosecution and the defence, the victims and the judges have the right to participate in the proceedings, but the victims and the judges do not have the right to initiate the proceedings, and the system applies to the period leading up to the court hearing after the review of the prosecution and the prosecution by the Prosecutor, The court examined the contents of the consultation through a public hearing. The defendant has the limited right of appeal, the victim has the right to object to the negotiation content, and the procuratorial organ has the right to withdraw the negotiation. The establishment of the right to silence, the discovery of evidence system and the perfection of the legal aid system are the guarantee of voluntary negotiation, wisdom and authenticity of the prosecution, and are the premise of the existence and development of the plea bargaining system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 譚世貴;;構(gòu)建中國認(rèn)罪協(xié)商制度研究[J];浙江工商大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年02期

2 陳國慶;;試論構(gòu)建中國式的認(rèn)罪協(xié)商制度[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2006年05期

3 王小光;李琴;;臺灣地區(qū)認(rèn)罪協(xié)商程序的引進(jìn)和運(yùn)作情況分析[J];中國刑事法雜志;2013年02期

4 俞波濤;周少華;;刑罰正當(dāng)化語境下的認(rèn)罪協(xié)商[J];國家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年03期

5 王曉輝;;認(rèn)罪協(xié)商程序的實(shí)體側(cè)面解讀[J];河南教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2014年04期

6 鄧楚開;楊獻(xiàn)國;;構(gòu)建中國式認(rèn)罪協(xié)商制度的實(shí)踐探索——浙江省紹興市基層檢察機(jī)關(guān)認(rèn)罪輕案程序改革實(shí)證分析[J];中國刑事法雜志;2009年12期

7 羅永志;;認(rèn)罪也可以協(xié)商[J];大科技(百科新說);2012年02期

8 李婷;;我國臺灣地區(qū)刑事協(xié)商程序初探[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2010年02期

9 段明學(xué);;論構(gòu)建多元化的認(rèn)罪案件處理程序[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年02期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前3條

1 北京市人民檢察院 楊江波;加拿大的認(rèn)罪協(xié)商制度及對我國的借鑒[N];檢察日報;2008年

2 陳界融;“認(rèn)罪協(xié)商”的司法實(shí)踐觀察[N];光明日報;2007年

3 本報特約記者 木曰;扁家弊案六被告認(rèn)罪協(xié)商遭拒[N];人民日報海外版;2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 吳f，

本文編號：2249061