【摘要】：刑事程序性辯護(hù)有效性能夠體現(xiàn)一國的程序運(yùn)作狀況,決定主體對(duì)程序性辯護(hù)策略的選取,關(guān)涉到公正審判權(quán)、辯護(hù)權(quán)等法律賦予公民的基本人權(quán),形式意義上的辯護(hù)向?qū)嵸|(zhì)意義上的辯護(hù)的轉(zhuǎn)變是法治國家辯護(hù)制度的發(fā)展的基本趨勢,必須激活保障程序性辯護(hù)有效性的內(nèi)在動(dòng)力因素,觀念轉(zhuǎn)變、程序法律條文結(jié)構(gòu)的完善、職業(yè)者的業(yè)務(wù)素質(zhì)和道德水平的提高、執(zhí)業(yè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的完善及程序性裁判中控辯審三方的關(guān)系的平衡,是提升刑事程序性辯護(hù)有效性的基本路徑。
[Abstract]:The effectiveness of criminal procedural defense can reflect the state of procedural operation of a country and determine the choice of procedural defense strategy by the subject, which involves the basic human rights granted to citizens by law, such as the right to a fair trial and the right to defense. The transformation from formal defense to substantive defense is the basic trend of the development of defense system in a country ruled by law. It is necessary to activate the internal motive factors to guarantee the validity of procedural defense, the change of concept, and the perfection of the structure of procedural legal provisions. The improvement of professional quality and moral level, the perfection of practice standard and the balance of the relationship between prosecution and defense in procedural judgment are the basic ways to improve the effectiveness of criminal procedural defense.
【作者單位】： 九江學(xué)院政法學(xué)院;
【基金】：江西省高校人文社會(huì)科學(xué)重點(diǎn)研究基地課題“社會(huì)系統(tǒng)學(xué)論域中的司法能動(dòng)”(SHXTX1208)的研究成果之一
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 顧永忠;李竺娉;;論刑事辯護(hù)的有效性及其實(shí)現(xiàn)條件——兼議“無效辯護(hù)”在我國的引入[J];西部法學(xué)評(píng)論;2008年01期

2 王U，

本文編號(hào)：2240371