【摘要】：《行政訴訟法》第73條新設了給付判決這一判決類型,厘清給付判決的適用范圍是對給付判決進一步研究和適用的必要前提。關(guān)于立法者新增給付判決條款的動因,主要有專門解決"行政給付"案件與等同于比較法上"一般給付判決"兩種不同的觀點,這兩種觀點在論證過程中均存在缺陷,但共同指出了給付判決是作為履行判決補丁存在的。通過對《行政訴訟法》實施一年半來法院適用給付判決的173份裁判文書的分析,可知法院在最寬泛意義上適用給付判決,使得履行判決與給付判決適用出現(xiàn)混同趨勢�；诮o付判決與履行判決概念之間的關(guān)聯(lián)性以及給付判決所處行政訴訟判決體系中的定位,得出給付判決適用于原告要求行政機關(guān)履行法定給付義務、基于行政協(xié)議的給付義務之外
[Abstract]:Article 73 of Administrative procedure Law sets up the judgment type of payment judgment, and it is necessary to clarify the scope of application of the judgment. There are two kinds of different viewpoints about legislator's new judgment clause of compensation, that is, solving the case of "administrative payment" specially and equating with "general judgment of payment" in comparative law, both of which have defects in the process of argumentation. However, it is pointed out that the award of payment exists as a patch for the performance of the judgment. Through the analysis of 173 documents that the court has applied to the judgment of payment in the past one and a half years, it can be seen that the court applies the judgment of payment in the broadest sense, which makes the application of performance judgment and the judgment of payment mixed. Based on the relationship between the judgment of compensation and the concept of performance of judgment and the orientation of the judgment system of administrative litigation, the conclusion is drawn that the judgment of payment is applicable to the plaintiff who requires the administrative organ to perform the obligation of statutory payment. Beyond the obligation to pay based on the Administrative Agreement
【作者單位】： 浙江工業(yè)大學法學院;浙江工業(yè)大學福利與法治研究中心;
【分類號】：D925.3

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 邵燕芬;;我國行政訴訟中一種缺失的判決:一般給付判決[J];中共鄭州市委黨校學報;2008年01期

2 常露;;論交換給付判決的合理性[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2013年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 案例編寫人 重慶市第五中級人民法院 代貞奎 何小兵;裁定準許撤回再審申請不當然恢復原判決執(zhí)行[N];人民法院報;2014年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 劉磊;論我國行政訴訟給付判決制度的完善[D];遼寧大學;2016年

，

本文編號：2239467