刑事對質(zhì)權(quán)研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-07 18:52
【摘要】：刑事對質(zhì)權(quán)是被告人在刑事訴訟過程中所享有的一項基本權(quán)利。近年來我國學(xué)術(shù)界對被告人對質(zhì)權(quán)的研究越來越多,司法案例也加強了被告人權(quán)利的保護,特別是黨的十八屆四中全會將審判中心改革提高到重要地位,而我們知道,審判中心的優(yōu)越性及其實現(xiàn)一定是要集中在庭審上,庭審的生命力又在于雙方的對抗性,那么被告人對質(zhì)權(quán)的賦予正是通過保障一種均衡的對抗來促進審判中心改革的。鑒于我國暫時對被告人對質(zhì)權(quán)的保護問題依然不容樂觀,本文從基本權(quán)利的角度著手研究對質(zhì)權(quán)。首先,對于被告人對質(zhì)權(quán)的一些基本問題做了簡單界定,明確了對質(zhì)權(quán)的豐富內(nèi)涵,并對學(xué)術(shù)上關(guān)于對質(zhì)權(quán)存在的兩方爭議做了具體介紹,提出本文將從基本權(quán)利的立場來研究對質(zhì)權(quán)。而且就目前對質(zhì)權(quán)發(fā)展存在質(zhì)疑的現(xiàn)象,將對質(zhì)權(quán)的發(fā)展趨勢做了簡單闡明,并進一步分析了賦予被告人對質(zhì)權(quán)在我國訴訟程序和實體雙重的價值意義。其次,在肯定對質(zhì)權(quán)研究的必要性基礎(chǔ)上,從法律制度、司法實踐兩個層面介紹了我國刑事對質(zhì)權(quán)的發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和問題。就當前來看我國的刑事訴訟法立法缺少規(guī)范,司法解釋對刑事對質(zhì)的規(guī)定不一致,存在法律的矛盾和沖突等,同時證人出庭難也導(dǎo)致對質(zhì)權(quán)虛置,這些問題背后實際上受我國政治制度傳統(tǒng)文化和法律制度等深層因素影響。再次,通過介紹域外對質(zhì)的一般規(guī)定,比較大陸法系、英美法系和國際人權(quán)法對質(zhì)的特點,大陸法系的二元制訴訟與英美國家的一元制在對質(zhì)的構(gòu)造上有較大區(qū)別,但都對對質(zhì)有了比較充分的保障,或在審前階段規(guī)定了對質(zhì),或以對質(zhì)權(quán)的形式保障。最后,結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)狀及國外對質(zhì)的有益規(guī)定,力求首先要在我國賦予被告人權(quán)利保障意義上的對質(zhì)權(quán)以打破根深蒂固的查明事實的工具性定位,進而完善對質(zhì)權(quán)的基本原則和內(nèi)容,并提出相應(yīng)的保障措施和限制性條件。
[Abstract]:The criminal right of pledge is a basic right enjoyed by the accused in the process of criminal proceedings. In recent years, there have been more and more researches on the defendant's right to pledge in the academic circles of our country, and judicial cases have also strengthened the protection of the defendant's rights. In particular, the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee raised the reform of the judicial center to an important position, and we know that, The superiority of the trial center and its realization must be concentrated on the trial, and the vitality of the trial lies in the adversarial of both sides, so the defendant endows the pledge right to promote the reform of the trial center by ensuring a balanced confrontation. In view of the fact that the protection of the defendant's pledge right is still not optimistic, this paper studies the pledge right from the angle of basic rights. First of all, the author makes a simple definition of some basic issues of the defendant's pledge right, clarifies the rich connotation of the pledge right, and makes a specific introduction to the academic dispute on the existence of the pledge right. This article will study the right of pledge from the standpoint of basic rights. Furthermore, this paper briefly clarifies the development trend of pledge right, and further analyzes the dual value meaning of giving defendant pledge right in our country's litigation procedure and entity. Secondly, on the basis of affirming the necessity of studying the pledge right, this paper introduces the present situation and problems of the development of the criminal pledge right in our country from the two aspects of legal system and judicial practice. As far as the current situation is concerned, the legislation of our criminal procedure law lacks norms, the provisions of the judicial interpretation on criminal confrontation are inconsistent, there are contradictions and conflicts of laws, and the difficulty of witnesses appearing in court also leads to the virtual establishment of the pledge right. These problems are actually influenced by the traditional culture and legal system of our political system. Thirdly, by introducing the general provisions of extra-territorial confrontation, comparing the characteristics of civil law system, common law system and international human rights law, the dualistic litigation of civil law system is different from the monism system of Anglo-American countries in the structure of confrontation. But there are more adequate guarantees for confrontation, or in the pretrial stage of confrontation, or in the form of pledge protection. Finally, in combination with the present situation of our country and the beneficial provisions of foreign confrontation, we strive to first of all try to break the deep-rooted instrumental orientation of finding out the facts in the sense of guaranteeing the rights of the accused in our country. Then the basic principles and contents of pledge rights are improved, and the corresponding safeguard measures and restrictive conditions are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2
本文編號：2229127
[Abstract]:The criminal right of pledge is a basic right enjoyed by the accused in the process of criminal proceedings. In recent years, there have been more and more researches on the defendant's right to pledge in the academic circles of our country, and judicial cases have also strengthened the protection of the defendant's rights. In particular, the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee raised the reform of the judicial center to an important position, and we know that, The superiority of the trial center and its realization must be concentrated on the trial, and the vitality of the trial lies in the adversarial of both sides, so the defendant endows the pledge right to promote the reform of the trial center by ensuring a balanced confrontation. In view of the fact that the protection of the defendant's pledge right is still not optimistic, this paper studies the pledge right from the angle of basic rights. First of all, the author makes a simple definition of some basic issues of the defendant's pledge right, clarifies the rich connotation of the pledge right, and makes a specific introduction to the academic dispute on the existence of the pledge right. This article will study the right of pledge from the standpoint of basic rights. Furthermore, this paper briefly clarifies the development trend of pledge right, and further analyzes the dual value meaning of giving defendant pledge right in our country's litigation procedure and entity. Secondly, on the basis of affirming the necessity of studying the pledge right, this paper introduces the present situation and problems of the development of the criminal pledge right in our country from the two aspects of legal system and judicial practice. As far as the current situation is concerned, the legislation of our criminal procedure law lacks norms, the provisions of the judicial interpretation on criminal confrontation are inconsistent, there are contradictions and conflicts of laws, and the difficulty of witnesses appearing in court also leads to the virtual establishment of the pledge right. These problems are actually influenced by the traditional culture and legal system of our political system. Thirdly, by introducing the general provisions of extra-territorial confrontation, comparing the characteristics of civil law system, common law system and international human rights law, the dualistic litigation of civil law system is different from the monism system of Anglo-American countries in the structure of confrontation. But there are more adequate guarantees for confrontation, or in the pretrial stage of confrontation, or in the form of pledge protection. Finally, in combination with the present situation of our country and the beneficial provisions of foreign confrontation, we strive to first of all try to break the deep-rooted instrumental orientation of finding out the facts in the sense of guaranteeing the rights of the accused in our country. Then the basic principles and contents of pledge rights are improved, and the corresponding safeguard measures and restrictive conditions are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 熊秋紅;;刑事證人作證制度之反思——以對質(zhì)權(quán)為中心的分析[J];中國政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年05期
2 魏強;;完善刑事證人出庭作證制度的建議[J];法制與社會;2008年35期
3 龍宗智;;論刑事對質(zhì)制度及其改革完善[J];法學(xué);2008年05期
4 陳永生;;我國刑事誤判問題透視——以20起震驚全國的刑事冤案為樣本的分析[J];中國法學(xué);2007年03期
5 黃玉萍;邵祖峰;張進輝;;公安機關(guān)辦案筆錄質(zhì)量調(diào)查實證分析[J];吉林公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2006年05期
6 吳暢;;論刑事庭審對質(zhì)[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年04期
7 左衛(wèi)民;馬靜華;;刑事證人出庭率:一種基于實證研究的理論闡述[J];中國法學(xué);2005年06期
8 龍宗智;印證與自由心證——我國刑事訴訟證明模式[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年02期
9 劉紅新,裴國強;刑事訴訟中有關(guān)對質(zhì)的幾個問題[J];江西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年02期
10 楊濤;同案犯罪嫌疑人不宜對質(zhì)[J];人民檢察;1997年03期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 詹俊輝;刑事被告人對質(zhì)權(quán)及其實現(xiàn)[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 揭小珍;刑事證人出庭作證調(diào)查報告[D];西南政法大學(xué);2014年
2 司現(xiàn)靜;刑事被告人對質(zhì)權(quán)的保障研究[D];浙江工業(yè)大學(xué);2013年
3 紀虎;論被告人的對質(zhì)詢問權(quán)[D];西南政法大學(xué);2004年
，本文編號：2229127
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2229127.html
