【摘要】：行政爭議與民事爭議交織的問題近年來越來越受到實務和理論界的關注,已然成為困擾審判實踐的一個難題。但在審判實踐中長期存在認識不統(tǒng)一、審判不統(tǒng)一、法律機制構建不完善的問題,使得審判實踐中民行交叉案件的處理成為一個亂象,各法院在審判程序、法律適用和裁判結果上均存在較大的差異。本文作者作為一名審判實務中的工作者,也深切感受到尋求一條解決民行交叉問題有效路徑的迫切性,本文欲厘清民行交叉案件中的復雜關系,為統(tǒng)一民行交叉案件訴訟機制提出自己的觀點,希望對統(tǒng)一審判實務者的認識,為我國目前尚無完整系統(tǒng)又無具體法律規(guī)定與實踐運作規(guī)則的法律層面提供一定參考。本文在引言部分通過對三個典型案件的分析,引出了民行交叉案件在實踐中產生的很多問題,如裁判思路不統(tǒng)一、民行判決產生矛盾、審理周期長、導致當事人訴累,總結出了本文所要解決的問題:探索民行交叉問題的解決方法。第一部分闡述了民行交叉案件及問題產生的根源,并從民行交叉案件產生的情形、產生的基礎關系為標準對其進行了分類,為解決民行交叉問題提供理論基礎支持。第二部分設計了防止民行交叉案件各類問題產生的合理訴訟模式。首先,介紹了理論上的各種訴訟模式;其次,在現(xiàn)行訴訟機制下分析民行交叉案件問題的解決方法,設計出合理的裁判路徑。第三部分在分析了民行交叉案件本質問題的基礎上,提出解決民行交叉問題的最終方法,并提出了單一訴訟模式和民行合一模式兩種模式,希望對現(xiàn)有民行交叉制度的構建進行完善和改革。
[Abstract]:The intertwining of administrative dispute and civil dispute has attracted more and more attention in the field of practice and theory in recent years, which has become a difficult problem puzzling trial practice. However, for a long time in trial practice, the problems of inconsistent understanding, inconsistent trial and imperfect construction of legal mechanism have made the handling of intersecting cases between the people and the people in trial practice a mess, and the courts are in the trial procedure. There are great differences in the application of law and the result of judgment. As a worker in trial practice, the author of this paper also feels the urgency of seeking an effective way to solve the problem of the intersection of civil conduct and conduct. In order to unify the litigation mechanism of civil intersecting cases, the author puts forward his own viewpoint and hopes that the understanding of the unified trial practitioners can provide a certain reference for the legal level of our country that there is no complete system and no specific legal provisions and practical operational rules at present. In the introduction part, through the analysis of the three typical cases, it leads to a lot of problems in the practice of the people's Bank Cross cases, such as the inconsistent thinking of the referee, the contradiction of the people's execution judgment, the long trial period, and the litigants' litigation tiredness. This paper summarizes the problems to be solved: to explore the solution to the problem of the intersection of civil conduct. The first part expounds the origin of the civil and bank cross cases and the origin of the problems, and classifies them according to the situation of the people's and banks' cross cases, and provides the theoretical basis for solving the problems of people's and banks' crossing The second part designs the reasonable litigation mode to prevent all kinds of problems. Firstly, it introduces the various litigation modes in theory. Secondly, it analyzes the solution to the problem of civil conduct cross cases under the current litigation mechanism, and designs a reasonable judgment path. In the third part, on the basis of analyzing the essence of the civil behavior cross case, the author puts forward the final method to solve the problem, and puts forward two modes: the single litigation mode and the combination of people and action mode. The author hopes to perfect and reform the existing civil-bank cross-system.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1;D925.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 趙江風;;物權法區(qū)分原則：房屋登記民行交叉案件的裁判路徑[J];山東審判;2012年04期

2 葉飛;;不動產登記中的民行交叉問題[J];法制與社會;2011年32期

3 公衍義;;論民行交叉糾紛實質性化解的途徑——兼論行政行為效力中止制度[J];山東審判;2011年03期

4 李佳;;論民行交叉案件現(xiàn)行處理模式中存在的風險及其預防[J];法學雜志;2011年05期

5 姚虹;;論不動產登記制度之完善[J];學術交流;2011年03期

6 寧杰;;民行交叉訴訟中基礎訴訟的確定[J];人民司法;2011年01期

7 章曉民;謝紅丹;;淺議房地產登記案件中的民行交叉問題[J];法制與社會;2010年35期

8 曹婧;;房屋權屬糾紛訴訟機制探析——以民行交叉為背景展開[J];西南政法大學學報;2010年05期

9 李佳;;民行交叉案件法律責任之法理分析[J];湖南大學學報(社會科學版);2010年04期

10 陳耀東;楊雅婷;;試論不動產登記案件的民行交叉問題[J];中國房地產;2010年05期

，

本文編號：2227284