論民事訴訟審前程序的立法完善
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-04 15:51
【摘要】：本文通過四個部分對民事訴訟審前程序的適用與完善進行了分析與研究：第一部分，初步探討了民事訴訟審前程序的基礎(chǔ)理論，界定了民事訴訟審前程序的概念，明確了它的特征和功能。首先，確立符合其本質(zhì)的名稱，并且通過對研究學者們提出的各種觀點的比較和研究，選擇歸納出了民事訴訟審前程序的定義；其次，從其多元主體參與、時間的特定性以及程序的確定性等三個方面歸納闡述了其特征；最后，歸納總結(jié)了民事訴訟審前程序的三個重要功能，即明確爭點、收集固定證據(jù)以及促進案件提前終結(jié)。第二部分，，對兩大法系主要國家的審前程序進行了研究，主要研究了英國、美國、法國、日本以及德國的審前程序的發(fā)展變革過程，并研究分析了兩大法系的幾個主要國家的審前程序的相同點和不同點。第三部分，主要對我國民事訴訟審前程序的現(xiàn)狀進行了考察和評價。首先，對新《民事訴訟法》與最高人民法院司法解釋中審前程序的內(nèi)容進行了系統(tǒng)的介紹；其次，結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)實國情與現(xiàn)狀，對我國的民事訴訟審前程序存在的弊端進行了分析和介紹。第四部分，對我國民事訴訟審前程序的完善與適用進行了研討，并提出了一些改善的觀點。首先，對于審前程序的基本制度重構(gòu)應(yīng)當借鑒協(xié)同主義的合理內(nèi)核，轉(zhuǎn)變審前程序的理念，從職權(quán)主義向當事人主義進行轉(zhuǎn)變，對法官的釋明義務(wù)做出明確的規(guī)定，在民事訴訟中實行集中審理主義；其次，細化當事人訴答活動的相關(guān)規(guī)定；第三，確定證據(jù)交換的范圍、主持者、交換的時間次數(shù)和方式，進一步的規(guī)范我國的證據(jù)交換制度，完善與證據(jù)交換直接相關(guān)的制度；最后，通過明確爭點整理的適用范圍、主客體、方法以及確定其終結(jié)及效力來完善審前程序中的爭點整理。筆者通過上述研究，希望能夠?qū)γ袷略V訟審前程序的改革做出貢獻。
[Abstract]:This paper analyzes and studies the application and perfection of civil pretrial procedure through four parts: the first part discusses the basic theory of civil pretrial procedure and defines the concept of civil pretrial procedure. Its features and functions are clarified. First of all, establish the name that accords with its essence, and through the comparison and research of the various viewpoints put forward by the scholars, select and sum up the definition of the civil pretrial procedure; secondly, participate from its multiple subjects. Finally, it summarizes the three important functions of the pretrial procedure in civil litigation, that is, defining the points of contention, collecting fixed evidence and promoting the early termination of the case. In the second part, the author studies the pretrial procedure in the main countries of the two legal systems, mainly studying the process of the development and transformation of the pretrial procedure in the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Japan and Germany. It also analyzes the similarities and differences of pretrial procedures in several major countries of the two legal systems. The third part mainly investigates and evaluates the present situation of civil procedure in our country. Firstly, it systematically introduces the content of the pretrial procedure in the new Civil procedure Law and the judicial interpretation of the Supreme people's Court. This paper analyzes and introduces the drawbacks of the pretrial procedure in civil litigation in China. In the fourth part, the author discusses the perfection and application of the pretrial procedure in civil litigation in China, and puts forward some points of improvement. First of all, the reconstruction of the basic system of pretrial procedure should draw lessons from the reasonable core of Synergy, change the concept of pretrial procedure, change from the doctrine of authority to the doctrine of the parties, and make a clear stipulation on the interpretation obligation of the judge. Implement centralism in civil proceedings; secondly, refine the relevant provisions of litigant action; third, determine the scope of evidence exchange, the host, the time and mode of exchange, and further standardize the evidence exchange system in our country. Improve the system directly related to the exchange of evidence; finally, by clarifying the scope of application, subject and object, methods and determination of its termination and effectiveness in the pretrial process to perfect the arrangement of points. Through the above research, I hope to contribute to the reform of civil pretrial procedure.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1
本文編號：2222640
[Abstract]:This paper analyzes and studies the application and perfection of civil pretrial procedure through four parts: the first part discusses the basic theory of civil pretrial procedure and defines the concept of civil pretrial procedure. Its features and functions are clarified. First of all, establish the name that accords with its essence, and through the comparison and research of the various viewpoints put forward by the scholars, select and sum up the definition of the civil pretrial procedure; secondly, participate from its multiple subjects. Finally, it summarizes the three important functions of the pretrial procedure in civil litigation, that is, defining the points of contention, collecting fixed evidence and promoting the early termination of the case. In the second part, the author studies the pretrial procedure in the main countries of the two legal systems, mainly studying the process of the development and transformation of the pretrial procedure in the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Japan and Germany. It also analyzes the similarities and differences of pretrial procedures in several major countries of the two legal systems. The third part mainly investigates and evaluates the present situation of civil procedure in our country. Firstly, it systematically introduces the content of the pretrial procedure in the new Civil procedure Law and the judicial interpretation of the Supreme people's Court. This paper analyzes and introduces the drawbacks of the pretrial procedure in civil litigation in China. In the fourth part, the author discusses the perfection and application of the pretrial procedure in civil litigation in China, and puts forward some points of improvement. First of all, the reconstruction of the basic system of pretrial procedure should draw lessons from the reasonable core of Synergy, change the concept of pretrial procedure, change from the doctrine of authority to the doctrine of the parties, and make a clear stipulation on the interpretation obligation of the judge. Implement centralism in civil proceedings; secondly, refine the relevant provisions of litigant action; third, determine the scope of evidence exchange, the host, the time and mode of exchange, and further standardize the evidence exchange system in our country. Improve the system directly related to the exchange of evidence; finally, by clarifying the scope of application, subject and object, methods and determination of its termination and effectiveness in the pretrial process to perfect the arrangement of points. Through the above research, I hope to contribute to the reform of civil pretrial procedure.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王福華;;現(xiàn)代調(diào)解制度若干問題研究[J];當代法學;2009年06期
2 湯維建,陳巍;《關(guān)于民事訴訟證據(jù)的若干規(guī)定》的創(chuàng)新與不足[J];法商研究;2005年03期
3 王利明;民事證據(jù)規(guī)則司法解釋若干問題研究[J];法學;2004年01期
4 駱興國;;淺談我國民事訴訟審前程序之獨立價值及其完善[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬);2013年07期
5 葉宇昆;;外國民事審前程序的比較研究[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年08期
6 肖輝;民事審前程序的概念界定與模式選擇[J];河北法學;2005年01期
7 畢玉謙;;民事訴訟起訴要件與訴訟系屬之間關(guān)系的定位[J];華東政法學院學報;2006年04期
8 張建偉;認識相對主義與訴訟的競技化[J];法學研究;2004年04期
9 鄭夏;;民事訴訟審前程序改革研究[J];蘭州學刊;2013年02期
10 王志遠;趙昕;;基層法院審判組織運行現(xiàn)狀及改革構(gòu)想[J];山東審判;2010年06期
本文編號：2222640
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2222640.html
