行政行為合理性的司法審查問(wèn)題研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-08-29 18:31
【摘要】:隨著行政裁量權(quán)的不斷發(fā)展與逐步擴(kuò)張,對(duì)政府行使行政權(quán)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)有了更高的要求。政府的行政行為不僅要符合法律的規(guī)定,而且要具有合理性。合法性體現(xiàn)的是最基本的正義,而合理性表達(dá)的是較高程度的正義。合理性問(wèn)題是合法性問(wèn)題的延伸,是更深層次的合法性問(wèn)題,是實(shí)質(zhì)意義的合法性問(wèn)題。行政法治是依法治國(guó)原則在行政法領(lǐng)域中的具體體現(xiàn),行政法治的核心就在于實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)行政權(quán)的有效控制。孟德斯鳩曾說(shuō)“一切有權(quán)力的人都容易濫用權(quán)力,這是萬(wàn)古不變的經(jīng)驗(yàn),有權(quán)力的人們使用權(quán)力一直遇到有界限的地方才休止。防止濫用權(quán)力的辦法,就是以權(quán)力約束權(quán)力”。人民法院對(duì)行政行為進(jìn)行司法審查對(duì)于維護(hù)公平正義和實(shí)現(xiàn)依法行政具有重要的意義。因此,對(duì)于行政權(quán)來(lái)說(shuō),司法審查是控制行政權(quán)最有效的方式和方法。我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的《行政訴訟法》僅規(guī)定了法院可以對(duì)行政行為進(jìn)行合法性審查,對(duì)行政行為合理性即行政權(quán)行使是否合理的司法審查還沒(méi)有做出進(jìn)一步的規(guī)定。我國(guó)行政訴訟中單一性的司法審查原則與行政法治要求的合法性原則和合理性原則存在脫節(jié),這不僅阻礙了司法審查理論的發(fā)展,而且在司法實(shí)踐中行政機(jī)關(guān)合法但不合理的行政行為侵犯行政相對(duì)人合法利益的情況也時(shí)有發(fā)生,行政相對(duì)人在面對(duì)此種情況時(shí)因沒(méi)有相應(yīng)法律救濟(jì)途徑而往往處于尷尬境地。因此,筆者在文章中重點(diǎn)對(duì)行政行為合理性的司法審查做一些分析和探討,希望對(duì)相關(guān)理論和司法實(shí)踐有所幫助。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development and gradual expansion of administrative discretion, there are higher requirements for the government to exercise administrative power. The administrative behavior of the government should not only conform to the law, but also be reasonable. Legitimacy embodies the most basic justice, while rationality expresses a higher degree of justice. Rationality problem is an extension of legitimacy problem, a deeper legitimacy problem and a legitimacy problem of substantive significance. The administrative rule of law is the concrete embodiment of the principle of governing the country according to law in the field of administrative law. The core of the administrative rule of law lies in the effective control of the administrative power. Montesquieu once said, "all people who have power are apt to abuse power. It is an everlasting experience. The way to prevent abuse of power is to restrain power by power. " The judicial review of administrative acts by people's courts is of great significance to the maintenance of fairness and justice and the realization of administration according to law. Therefore, for administrative power, judicial review is the most effective way to control administrative power. The current Administrative procedure Law of our country only stipulates that the court may examine the legality of the administrative act, and there is no further regulation on the rationality of the administrative act, that is, the judicial review of whether the exercise of the administrative power is reasonable or not. There is a disconnection between the principle of single judicial review and the principle of legality and rationality, which not only hinders the development of the theory of judicial review. And in judicial practice, the legal but unreasonable administrative acts of administrative organs infringe on the legitimate interests of the administrative counterpart also occur from time to time, administrative counterpart in the face of such a situation because there is no corresponding legal remedies and often in an awkward situation. Therefore, the author makes some analysis and discussion on the judicial review of the rationality of administrative behavior in the article, hoping to be helpful to the relevant theory and judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D925.3
本文編號(hào):2212053
[Abstract]:With the continuous development and gradual expansion of administrative discretion, there are higher requirements for the government to exercise administrative power. The administrative behavior of the government should not only conform to the law, but also be reasonable. Legitimacy embodies the most basic justice, while rationality expresses a higher degree of justice. Rationality problem is an extension of legitimacy problem, a deeper legitimacy problem and a legitimacy problem of substantive significance. The administrative rule of law is the concrete embodiment of the principle of governing the country according to law in the field of administrative law. The core of the administrative rule of law lies in the effective control of the administrative power. Montesquieu once said, "all people who have power are apt to abuse power. It is an everlasting experience. The way to prevent abuse of power is to restrain power by power. " The judicial review of administrative acts by people's courts is of great significance to the maintenance of fairness and justice and the realization of administration according to law. Therefore, for administrative power, judicial review is the most effective way to control administrative power. The current Administrative procedure Law of our country only stipulates that the court may examine the legality of the administrative act, and there is no further regulation on the rationality of the administrative act, that is, the judicial review of whether the exercise of the administrative power is reasonable or not. There is a disconnection between the principle of single judicial review and the principle of legality and rationality, which not only hinders the development of the theory of judicial review. And in judicial practice, the legal but unreasonable administrative acts of administrative organs infringe on the legitimate interests of the administrative counterpart also occur from time to time, administrative counterpart in the face of such a situation because there is no corresponding legal remedies and often in an awkward situation. Therefore, the author makes some analysis and discussion on the judicial review of the rationality of administrative behavior in the article, hoping to be helpful to the relevant theory and judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D925.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張瑞強(qiáng);;對(duì)非訴行政行為應(yīng)適用合法性兼顧合理性司法審查原則[J];人民司法;2015年19期
2 劉婷;;行政自由裁量權(quán)的司法規(guī)制——合理性審查原則的采用[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2014年06期
3 王傳干;;行政裁量基準(zhǔn)的司法審查[J];廣東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期
4 江必新;;行政程序正當(dāng)性的司法審查[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2012年07期
5 黃垣;;論行政合理性司法審查[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下半月);2008年01期
6 周敏生;;淺淡我國(guó)確立行政合理性司法審查制度的設(shè)想[J];中國(guó)集體經(jīng)濟(jì)(下半月);2007年09期
7 李爽;王思成;;論行政合理性的司法審查[J];山東電大學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期
8 程方升;;和諧社會(huì)取向下行政合理性司法審查:失范與規(guī)制[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年07期
9 杜豐;;論對(duì)行政行為合理性的司法審查[J];產(chǎn)業(yè)與科技論壇;2007年03期
10 鄭英;;論行政合理性原則在司法審查中的運(yùn)用[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年05期
,本文編號(hào):2212053
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2212053.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著