員額制改革下的法官選任研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-29 16:57
【摘要】：現(xiàn)如今,中國法官選任制度在司法體制改革的大背景下面臨著諸多問題,而現(xiàn)代法治國家大多強調(diào)通過培養(yǎng)高水平、高素質(zhì)的法官隊伍以尋求司法公正,但諸如法官準(zhǔn)入門檻過低以及法官選任機制不科學(xué)等問題依舊存在。在談及法官選任制度時,我國應(yīng)堅持實事求是原則,以我國現(xiàn)實情況為出發(fā)點,以外國經(jīng)驗為借鑒,建立獨樹一幟且具有中國特色的法官選任制度。司法改革中的員額制所反映的就是法官的選任問題�，F(xiàn)行我國推行的司法改革員額制就是要探索一條具有中國社會主義特色符合司法改革規(guī)律的改革之路。法官員額制要從司法審判實踐中探索,但最終要服務(wù)于司法實踐。當(dāng)前,員額制改革試點工作正在東中西部、發(fā)達與欠發(fā)達地區(qū)分批次有序進行著,期間也暴露出了法官整體素質(zhì)偏低、地域劃分導(dǎo)致法官員額困境、不同類型法官選任難以權(quán)衡及員額制后法院工作配套機制的缺失等不少現(xiàn)實問題,這就需要我們要重新審視現(xiàn)實存在的困境的必要性。本文從我國實行司法改革員額制的現(xiàn)實性和必要性出發(fā),比較域外法官選任相關(guān)制度,提出設(shè)計公平公正的員額法官科學(xué)選任方式,根據(jù)地域的不同劃分員額法官案件負擔(dān),進而大膽設(shè)想提出彈性開放員額制設(shè)想,同時明確員額法官管理機制的配套,這也是當(dāng)前的司法改革探索實踐中必須要給予正面回答的問題。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, the system of selecting and appointing judges in China is facing many problems under the background of the reform of the judicial system. However, most modern countries under the rule of law emphasize the pursuit of judicial justice by cultivating a high level and high quality team of judges. However, problems such as low entry threshold and unscientific selection mechanism still exist. When talking about the system of judge selection and appointment, our country should adhere to the principle of seeking truth from facts, take the actual situation of our country as the starting point and take foreign experience as reference, and establish a unique system of judge selection with Chinese characteristics. The post system in judicial reform reflects the selection of judges. The current judicial reform post system in China is to explore a reform road with Chinese socialist characteristics that conforms to the law of judicial reform. Judge post system should be explored from judicial practice, but finally serve judicial practice. At present, the pilot work of post system reform is being carried out in the east, west, west and west, and in the developed and underdeveloped areas, the batch is proceeding in an orderly manner. During this period, it is also exposed that the overall quality of judges is on the low side, and the geographical division leads to the plight of judges' posts. It is difficult to weigh different types of judges and lack of supporting mechanism of court work after post system, which requires us to re-examine the necessity of the dilemma existing in reality. Based on the reality and necessity of the judicial reform in our country, this paper compares the relative system of foreign judge selection, and proposes to design a fair and fair scientific selection method of post judge, and to divide the burden of post judge cases according to different regions. Furthermore, it is a bold idea to put forward the idea of flexible and open post system, and at the same time to clarify the matching of post judge management mechanism, which is also a question that must be answered positively in the practice of judicial reform at present.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D926.2
本文編號：2211830
[Abstract]:Nowadays, the system of selecting and appointing judges in China is facing many problems under the background of the reform of the judicial system. However, most modern countries under the rule of law emphasize the pursuit of judicial justice by cultivating a high level and high quality team of judges. However, problems such as low entry threshold and unscientific selection mechanism still exist. When talking about the system of judge selection and appointment, our country should adhere to the principle of seeking truth from facts, take the actual situation of our country as the starting point and take foreign experience as reference, and establish a unique system of judge selection with Chinese characteristics. The post system in judicial reform reflects the selection of judges. The current judicial reform post system in China is to explore a reform road with Chinese socialist characteristics that conforms to the law of judicial reform. Judge post system should be explored from judicial practice, but finally serve judicial practice. At present, the pilot work of post system reform is being carried out in the east, west, west and west, and in the developed and underdeveloped areas, the batch is proceeding in an orderly manner. During this period, it is also exposed that the overall quality of judges is on the low side, and the geographical division leads to the plight of judges' posts. It is difficult to weigh different types of judges and lack of supporting mechanism of court work after post system, which requires us to re-examine the necessity of the dilemma existing in reality. Based on the reality and necessity of the judicial reform in our country, this paper compares the relative system of foreign judge selection, and proposes to design a fair and fair scientific selection method of post judge, and to divide the burden of post judge cases according to different regions. Furthermore, it is a bold idea to put forward the idea of flexible and open post system, and at the same time to clarify the matching of post judge management mechanism, which is also a question that must be answered positively in the practice of judicial reform at present.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D926.2
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 季衛(wèi)東;;司法改革如何破局[J];中國改革;2014年06期
2 潘培偉;;淺析我國法官選任制度的現(xiàn)狀及完善[J];黑河學(xué)刊;2012年12期
3 吳久宏;;論初任法官培訓(xùn)機制之建構(gòu)——以北京法院為例[J];法律適用;2012年08期
4 趙興洪;;司法區(qū)劃分基本問題研究[J];西南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年01期
5 左衛(wèi)民;;中國法官任用機制:基于理念的初步評析[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2010年05期
6 王琦;;國外法官遴選制度的考察與借鑒——以美、英、德、法、日五國法官遴選制度為中心[J];法學(xué)論壇;2010年05期
7 李立新;;我國法官選任制度的問題與改革[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年04期
8 李立新;劉方勇;;我國法官職業(yè)化改革進程回顧與展望——以改革試點方法和模式為實證分析視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年06期
9 陳雅麗;潘傳表;;簡析西方國家法官選任的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和程序[J];求索;2008年02期
10 郭毅敏;聞長智;袁銀平;;法官員額:理論邏輯、現(xiàn)實背景及制度構(gòu)建[J];湖北行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年01期
，本文編號：2211830
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/susongfa/2211830.html
