【摘要】：全國人民代表大會常務委員會于2014年6月27日頒布《關于授權最高人民法院、最高人民檢察院在部分地區(qū)開展刑事案件速裁程序試點工作的決定》;在授權后,最高人民法院、最高人民檢察院聯(lián)合公安部、司法部于2014年8月22日出臺《關于在部分地區(qū)開展刑事案件速裁程序試點工作的辦法》。上述兩個規(guī)定的出臺標志著為期兩年的刑事速裁程序正式開始實施。速裁程序的開展,引起了法律界和社會公眾的關注和持續(xù)熱議。經過兩年的試點工作,刑事速裁程序在取得一定成績的同時也暴露出一些弊端。本文以刑事速裁程序的辯護狀況為研究對象,結合實地調研對辯護狀況進行研究。辯護權涉及到被追訴人的知悉權,有利于實現(xiàn)程序正義,進而實現(xiàn)案件的公平與正義。速裁程序有利于訴訟效率的提高,司法資源的節(jié)約以及訴訟成本的降低,然而司法機關在追求訴訟效率的同時,會侵犯被追訴人參與訴訟的權利,尤其是辯護權。本文共分為三個部分:第一部分為刑事速裁程序中辯護的重要作用。辯護在刑事速裁程序中可以維護被追訴人的合法權益,有利于實現(xiàn)程序正當,有利于提高司法效率。第二部分為刑事速裁程序中辯護現(xiàn)狀分析。筆者對部分試點法院進行實地調研,發(fā)現(xiàn)刑事速裁程序中辯護存在的問題,并分析成因。第三部分為完善刑事速裁程序中辯護的若干建議。筆者結合實地調查的問題和成因提出以下建議:擴大法律援助對象的范圍;落實值班律師制度;有效銜接法律援助程序與刑事速裁程序;提高律師參與速裁程序的積極性。
[Abstract]:On 27 June 2014, the standing Committee of the National people's Congress promulgated the decision on authorizing the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate to carry out the pilot work of expediting the adjudication of criminal cases in some areas; after the authorization, the Supreme people's Court, On August 22, 2014, the Supreme people's Procuratorate jointly with the Ministry of Public Security and the Ministry of Justice issued the "measures on the pilot work of expediting the adjudication procedure for Criminal cases in some regions". The introduction of these two regulations marks the start of a two-year criminal procedure. The rapid adjudication procedure has aroused the attention of the legal profession and the public. After two years of pilot work, the criminal quick-adjudication procedure has made some achievements at the same time also exposed some drawbacks. In this paper, the defense status of criminal quick-adjudication procedure as the research object, combined with field research to study the defense situation. The right of defense involves the right to know of the accused, which is beneficial to the realization of procedural justice, and then to the fairness and justice of the case. The quick adjudication procedure is beneficial to the improvement of litigation efficiency, the saving of judicial resources and the reduction of litigation cost. However, when the judicial organs pursue the efficiency of litigation, they will violate the right of the accused to participate in the proceedings, especially the right of defense. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part is the important role of defense in the criminal procedure. Defense can safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the accused in the criminal adjudication procedure, which is conducive to the realization of due process and the improvement of judicial efficiency. The second part is the analysis of the present situation of defense in the criminal adjudication procedure. Based on the field investigation of some trial courts, the author finds out the problems existing in the criminal procedure and analyzes the causes. The third part is to improve the criminal procedure in the defense of a number of suggestions. Combined with the problems and causes of field investigation, the author puts forward the following suggestions: to expand the scope of legal aid objects; to implement the duty lawyer system; to effectively link up the legal aid procedure with the criminal speedy adjudication procedure; and to improve the enthusiasm of lawyers to participate in the speedy adjudication procedure.
【學位授予單位】：山西大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭敏;陳玉官;方俊民;;刑事速裁程序量刑協(xié)商制度若干問題研究——基于福建省福清市人民法院試點觀察[J];法律適用;2016年04期

2 黃瑩;鄧凱;;刑事案件速裁程序中法律幫助制度探思[J];法治論壇;2016年01期

3 原立榮;;刑事速裁程序實證研究——以C市J區(qū)為分析樣本[J];首都師范大學學報(社會科學版);2016年01期

4 葉肖華;;簡上加簡:我國刑事速裁程序研究[J];浙江工商大學學報;2016年01期

5 廖大剛;白云飛;;刑事案件速裁程序試點運行現(xiàn)狀實證分析——以T市八家試點法院為研究樣本[J];法律適用;2015年12期

6 劉玫;魯楊;;我國刑事訴訟簡易程序再思考[J];法學雜志;2015年11期

7 潘金貴;李冉毅;;規(guī)則與實效:刑事速裁程序運行的初步檢視[J];安徽大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2015年06期

8 王樹楠;;刑事案件速裁程序探析[J];法制博覽;2015年30期

9 閻濤;苗彬;;淺議我國刑事簡易程序的完善[J];中國檢察官;2014年19期

10 熊秋紅;;刑事簡易速裁程序之權利保障與體系化建構[J];人民檢察;2014年17期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 陳小康;徐曉琴;陳義熙;;刑事速裁簡化但正義不能“打折”[N];人民法院報;2015年

，

本文編號：2211305