【摘要】：隨著我國司法建設的加強,在庭審制度方面進行了重大的改革,特別是新刑事訴訟法的實行,許多新的法律制度出現(xiàn)在我國的刑事訴訟法律中。而庭前會議制度是一項符合現(xiàn)代刑事訴訟法的要求,適應當前社會發(fā)展的一項新型法律制度,在借鑒外國刑事庭前制度和繼承本國刑事訴訟優(yōu)點的基礎上產生的。筆者認為刑事庭前會議主要任務是非法證據的排除,若對辯護人搜集的證據有異議的,應當提出。檢控方通過參加這個庭前會議,通過了解案件事實、證據材料對法律適用的爭議提出不同意見,解決與程序有關的問題,為后面正式的法庭審理做好準備。另一方面,辯護方對控方出示的證據有異議,可以提出非法證據排除的申請,這樣既有利于保護被告人的合法權益,又避免非法證據進入庭審,拖延了訴訟的時間,降低了訴訟的效率。筆者通過對我國庭前會議非法證據排除現(xiàn)狀的分析和說明,指出了我國的庭前會議在排除非法證據方面存在不足,并且對國外庭前程序的借鑒上也比較尷尬。那么針對這種情況在庭前會議及非法證據問題如何進行改革,筆者提出了一些設想。本文從結構上分為緒論和正文。在緒論部分,筆者闡述了寫作本文的必要性及研究背景。正文分為五部分：第一部分主要闡釋了庭前會議和非法證據排除兩個概念并介紹了庭前會議中進行非法證據排除的操作程序。第二部分是分析了我國庭前會議非法證據排除的現(xiàn)狀,指出了這項制度的缺點和不足,并指出今后改革做面臨的難題和困境。第三部分對各國的庭前程序作了比較研究。第四部分進一步闡述了庭前會議非法證據排除的法理基礎和價值功能。第五部分是本文的重點,針對庭前會議非法證據排除提出了一些制度的探索。
[Abstract]:With the strengthening of judicial construction in our country, great reform has been carried out in the trial system, especially in the implementation of the new criminal procedure law. Many new legal systems appear in the criminal procedure law of our country. The pretrial conference system is a new kind of legal system which accords with the requirements of the modern criminal procedure law and adapts to the current social development. It is produced on the basis of drawing lessons from the foreign criminal pretrial system and inheriting the advantages of domestic criminal procedure. The author thinks that the main task of the conference before the criminal court is to exclude the illegal evidence, if there is any objection to the evidence collected by the defender, it should be put forward. By attending the pre-court meeting, the prosecutor raises different opinions on disputes concerning the application of the law by understanding the facts of the case and the evidentiary materials, resolves questions related to the procedure, and prepares for the subsequent formal court hearing. On the other hand, if the defence objects to the evidence presented by the prosecution, it may apply for the exclusion of illegal evidence, which will not only help to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the accused, but also avoid illegal evidence from entering the trial, thus delaying the time of the proceedings. It reduces the efficiency of litigation. Based on the analysis and explanation of the current situation of the exclusion of illegal evidence from the pretrial conference in China, the author points out that there are some deficiencies in the exclusion of illegal evidence in the pretrial conference of our country, and the reference to the foreign pretrial procedure is also relatively awkward. In view of this situation in the pretrial conference and illegal evidence issues how to reform, the author put forward some ideas. This article is divided into the introduction and the text from the structure. In the introduction part, the author expounds the necessity and research background of writing this paper. The text is divided into five parts: the first part mainly explains the two concepts of pretrial meeting and illegal evidence exclusion and introduces the operation procedure of illegal evidence exclusion in pre-trial meeting. The second part analyzes the current situation of the exclusion of illegal evidence in China's pretrial conference, points out the shortcomings and shortcomings of this system, and points out the difficulties and difficulties faced by the future reform. The third part makes a comparative study on the pretrial procedure of various countries. The fourth part further expounds the legal basis and value function of the exclusion of illegal evidence. The fifth part is the focus of this paper, aiming at the exclusion of illegal evidence in the pretrial meeting, the author puts forward some system exploration.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 吳丹紅;;非法證據排除規(guī)則的實證研究——以法院處理刑訊逼供辯護為例[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2006年05期

2 汪建成,楊雄;比較法視野下的刑事庭前審查程序之改造[J];中國刑事法雜志;2002年06期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 趙娜;我國非法證據排除規(guī)則適用程序研究[D];吉林大學;2013年

2 王瑩瑩;論庭前會議制度[D];四川省社會科學院;2014年

，

本文編號：2184186