【摘要】：“尊重和保障人權(quán)”被寫入刑事訴訟法已有時(shí)日，隨著司法實(shí)踐中證據(jù)制度、辯護(hù)制度、強(qiáng)制措施、偵查措施、審查起訴、審判程序等制度的落實(shí)，逐步貫徹了尊重和保障人權(quán)的精神。這是中國(guó)人權(quán)事業(yè)的重大進(jìn)步，對(duì)于懲罰犯罪、保護(hù)人民以及保障公民的訴訟權(quán)利和其他合法權(quán)利，具有十分重大的意義。 懲罰犯罪和保障人權(quán)是刑事訴訟程序活動(dòng)的兩大重要目的，但是國(guó)家公權(quán)力在打擊犯罪的過程中，難免會(huì)因權(quán)力的不當(dāng)使用而侵犯公民人權(quán)，，使被追訴人得不到法律規(guī)定的人權(quán)保障，因此為了實(shí)現(xiàn)刑事訴訟懲罰犯罪與保障人權(quán)并重的目的，在刑事訴訟的過程中如何保障被追訴人的人權(quán)是刑事訴訟人權(quán)保障的重要課題。 加強(qiáng)刑事訴訟中被追訴人的人權(quán)保障，對(duì)于維護(hù)訴訟公正、正確適用憲法以及實(shí)現(xiàn)刑事訴訟中的人權(quán)具有重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。然而，長(zhǎng)期以來的官本位思想使得刑事訴訟中的人權(quán)沒有得到很好的貫徹，以至于出現(xiàn)刑訊逼供、暴力執(zhí)法導(dǎo)致的冤假錯(cuò)案，因此刑事訴訟中的人權(quán)保護(hù)問題仍然需要得到重視。本文首先通過界定刑事訴訟中被追訴人的人權(quán)，包括被追訴人人權(quán)的內(nèi)涵和分類，接著分析刑事訴訟結(jié)構(gòu)的完善與正當(dāng)法律程序原則對(duì)于保障被追訴人人權(quán)的意義，最后論述如何實(shí)現(xiàn)刑事訴訟中被追訴人人權(quán)保障的制度完善。
[Abstract]:"respecting and protecting human rights" has been written into the Criminal procedure Law for some time. With the implementation of the system of evidence, defense, coercive measures, investigation measures, examination and prosecution, trial procedure, etc., in judicial practice, The spirit of respecting and safeguarding human rights has been gradually implemented. This is a major advance in China's human rights cause and has great significance for punishing crimes, protecting the people and safeguarding citizens' litigation and other legal rights. Punishing crime and safeguarding human rights are two important purposes of criminal procedure activities. However, in the process of combating crime, the public power of the state will inevitably violate the human rights of citizens because of the improper use of power. Depriving the accused person of the human rights guarantees provided for by law, and thus, in order to achieve the goal of placing equal emphasis on the punishment of crimes and the protection of human rights in criminal proceedings, How to protect the human rights of the accused is an important subject in the criminal procedure. Strengthening the protection of the human rights of the accused in criminal proceedings is of great practical significance for safeguarding the fairness of litigation, correctly applying the Constitution and realizing human rights in criminal proceedings. However, for a long time, the official standard thought made the human rights in criminal proceedings not be well carried out, so that there were cases of unjust falsehood caused by torture and violent law enforcement. Therefore, the protection of human rights in criminal proceedings still needs to be paid attention to. This paper first defines the human rights of the accused in criminal proceedings, including the connotation and classification of the human rights of the accused, and then analyzes the significance of the perfection of the criminal procedure structure and the principle of due process for the protection of the human rights of the accused. Finally, it discusses how to perfect the system of human rights protection in criminal proceedings.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 呂淮波;論律師獨(dú)立于當(dāng)事人[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

2 陳衛(wèi)東;;刑事訴訟法再修改后刑事警察權(quán)與公民權(quán)的平衡[J];法學(xué)家;2012年03期

3 毛瑋;論訴和訴權(quán)[J];中央政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年01期

4 陳瑞華;;論被告人的閱卷權(quán)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2013年03期

5 陳瑞華;;論被告人的自主性辯護(hù)權(quán)——以“被告人會(huì)見權(quán)”為切入的分析[J];法學(xué)家;2013年06期

6 龍宗智;印證與自由心證——我國(guó)刑事訴訟證明模式[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年02期

7 白冬;刑事訴訟人權(quán)保障思想發(fā)展述論[J];南都學(xué)壇;2005年04期

8 胡之芳;王永明;;刑事訴訟人權(quán)保障的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];寧夏社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年03期

9 周寶峰;;憲政視野中的刑事被告人獲得律師幫助權(quán)研究[J];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期

10 田圣斌;完善律師辯護(hù)權(quán)的對(duì)策探討[J];鐵道警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

本文編號(hào)：2123076