本文選題：翻供 + 偵查障礙��； 參考：《甘肅政法學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：“翻供”是指犯罪嫌疑人在偵查過程中全部或者部分推翻、變更自己曾經(jīng)作出的有罪供述,提出相關(guān)辯解,或者作出新的供述改變?cè)瓉黻愂龅氖聦?shí),或者是推翻、改變?cè)?jīng)做出的針對(duì)他人犯罪行為的供述。從翻供的表現(xiàn)形式上看,翻供既可以是犯罪嫌疑人推翻自己原來作出的對(duì)自己或他人不利的供述,也可以是推翻對(duì)自己有利的辯解。從刑事訴訟程序上來看,翻供實(shí)際上是一種程序行為。該行為可以也可能發(fā)生在整個(gè)訴訟過程中的任何環(huán)節(jié)和階段。隨著人們法律意識(shí)的不斷增強(qiáng),犯罪嫌疑人會(huì)隨著訊問過程的不斷深入及環(huán)境的變化,心理活動(dòng)出現(xiàn)變動(dòng),翻供現(xiàn)象出現(xiàn)的可能性就越大。翻供在偵查階段出現(xiàn)會(huì)對(duì)案件的證據(jù)體系影響很大,意味著補(bǔ)充證據(jù)、補(bǔ)充偵查的情況就會(huì)發(fā)生,訴訟程序就會(huì)停滯不前,降低訴訟結(jié)案效率。就我國(guó)而言,犯罪嫌疑人翻供在司法實(shí)踐中并不罕見。學(xué)者和司法人員針對(duì)這一現(xiàn)象分析了犯罪嫌疑人翻供的原因,并針對(duì)原因提出了一些具體的司法建議。從翻供原因方面分析,諸多的觀點(diǎn)都認(rèn)為犯罪嫌疑人之所以翻供是因?yàn)槲纷锒髨D逃避處罰,或?yàn)榘铀硕品惹肮┦?還有受其他犯罪嫌疑人、律師等外界人員的影響。這些原因僅是其中的一部分,翻供頻發(fā)的原因不僅包括犯罪嫌疑人自身反復(fù)多變的因素,還包括外界因素的干擾。如果不分析出翻供的根本原因,提出的對(duì)策也是無法達(dá)到標(biāo)本兼治的作用的。本文第一部分主要對(duì)翻供在偵查階段的表現(xiàn)形式進(jìn)行分析,翻供在偵查階段的表現(xiàn)形式是復(fù)雜多變的。首先表現(xiàn)在翻供內(nèi)容的寬泛化,犯罪嫌疑人在偵查階段向偵查訊問人員供述自己的犯罪事實(shí)后,又推翻自己原有的供述,從更改內(nèi)容的不同可具體分為全部翻供和部分翻供、據(jù)實(shí)翻供與不據(jù)實(shí)翻供、有利翻供與不利翻供;其次表現(xiàn)在翻供程度的多樣化,因其翻供程度的不同劃分為試探性翻供、一翻到底型翻供、時(shí)供時(shí)翻型翻供、較難制服型翻供;最后表現(xiàn)在翻供環(huán)境復(fù)雜化,以犯罪嫌疑人所處的環(huán)境變化其所進(jìn)行的翻供進(jìn)行分析。本文第二部分主要對(duì)偵查階段出現(xiàn)翻供將會(huì)對(duì)案件的繼續(xù)偵查產(chǎn)生一定的影響進(jìn)行闡述。首先,在偵查階段犯罪嫌疑人進(jìn)行翻供影響訴訟程序的繼續(xù)進(jìn)行,其次,其打亂了偵查人員在偵查階段構(gòu)建的證據(jù)體系,最后,降低了整個(gè)案件的訴訟效率。翻供引起了整體審理期限的延長(zhǎng),增加了偵查難度和訴訟成本,占用司法資源,增加了辦案的壓力,降低了訴訟效率。本文第三部分主要對(duì)翻供案件在偵查階段出現(xiàn)的原因進(jìn)行深入分析,筆者從犯罪嫌疑人的趨利避害的心理變化開始闡述,進(jìn)而引出偵訊環(huán)境的監(jiān)管乏力所引起的翻供,不僅僅從犯罪嫌疑人的角度出發(fā)分析其原因,還應(yīng)從律師的不當(dāng)介入和偵查質(zhì)量的缺陷方面進(jìn)行分析。本文第四部分針對(duì)偵查階段翻供原因提出應(yīng)對(duì)策略,首先要針對(duì)犯罪嫌疑人進(jìn)行心理預(yù)防,其次要加強(qiáng)羈押場(chǎng)所的監(jiān)督管理工作,另外還要規(guī)范律師的執(zhí)業(yè)活動(dòng),最后要從各方面提高偵查質(zhì)量。
[Abstract]:"Confession" means that a criminal suspect overthrow or partly overthrow in the process of investigation, change the guilty confession that he has made, put forward a relevant argument, or make a new statement to change the facts of the original statement, or overthrow, change the confession that has been made against the crimes of others. It can be a criminal suspect overthrowing his or her own disadvantageous confession or an excuse to overthrow himself. From the criminal procedure, the confession is actually a procedural act. This act may also occur in any link and stage of the whole proceedings. With the legal consciousness of the people. With the continuous enhancement of the criminal suspects, the criminal suspects will change with the continuous deepening of the interrogation process and the change of the environment. The possibility of the occurrence of the confession is greater. The appearance of the reconnaissance stage will have a great influence on the evidence system of the case, which means that the evidence will be supplemented and the situation of the reconnaissance will occur and the proceedings will stagnate. Not before, to reduce the efficiency of the lawsuit. As far as China is concerned, the confession of criminal suspects is not rare in judicial practice. Scholars and judicial personnel have analyzed the reasons for the confession of criminal suspects and put forward some specific judicial suggestions in view of this phenomenon. From the analysis of the reasons for the reasons for the return, many views are considered as suspects. The reason why the confession is due to the fear of the crime is an attempt to escape the punishment, or to overthrow the previous confession for the shelter of others, and the influence of other suspects, lawyers and other external personnel. These are only part of these reasons. The reasons for frequent confession include not only the repeated factors of the suspect itself, but also the interference of external factors. If we do not analyze the root cause of the confession, the countermeasures are also unable to achieve the role of both the specimen and the treatment. The first part of this article is mainly to analyze the manifestation of the reconnaissance stage, and the form of expression is complex and changeable in the stage of investigation. First, it is manifested in the broad generalization of the content of the confession, and the criminal suspect is in the investigation stage. After confessing his own criminal facts to the investigative interrogators, they overthrow their original confession, and they can be divided into full confession and partial confession from the different changes of content, the confession and untruthful confession are made, and the confession is favorable and the disadvantageous confession is favorable; secondly, the diversity of the degree of confession is displayed, and the difference of the degree of confession is divided into tentative exploration. In the second part of this paper, the second part of this article is mainly to explain the influence on the continuing investigation of the case. First, in the stage of investigation, criminal suspects' reconfession affects the continuation of the proceedings. Secondly, it disrupts the evidence system constructed by investigators in the stage of investigation. Finally, it reduces the efficiency of the whole case, which causes the extension of the whole trial period, increasing the difficulty and cost of the litigation, occupying judicial resources, increasing the judicial resources, and increasing the judicial resources. The third part of this article mainly analyzes the causes of the case in the investigation stage, and the author begins to elaborate on the psychological change of the suspects, and then leads to the reconnaissance caused by the lack of supervision of the surveillance environment, not only from the angle of the criminal suspect. Analysis of the reasons for the reasons, should also be analyzed from the improper intervention of lawyers and the defects of the investigation quality. The fourth part of this paper puts forward the countermeasures against the reasons for the reconnaissance in the investigation stage, first of all, to prevent the criminal suspects from psychological prevention, secondly, to strengthen the supervision and management of the detention places, and to standardize the practice activities of lawyers, and finally, We should improve the quality of investigation in all aspects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：甘肅政法學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 迮銀軍;偵查階段應(yīng)確立指定法律幫助制度[J];人民檢察;2003年05期

2 梁桂芝,趙東海;論偵查階段犯罪嫌疑人的人權(quán)保障[J];哈爾濱市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期

3 楊潔;童娣;;淺析偵查階段犯罪嫌疑人的人權(quán)保障[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年30期

4 韓來平,強(qiáng)美英;析我國(guó)偵查階段律師介入制度[J];山西警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2002年02期

5 張紅俠;論偵查階段犯罪嫌疑人的人權(quán)保障[J];洛陽(yáng)工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年03期

6 花克明 ,唐勇;偵查階段律師向犯罪嫌疑人了解什么[J];人民公安;2002年07期

7 秦紅鵬;偵查階段律師介入權(quán)的對(duì)比啟示[J];山西經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

8 劉永春,周善俊,周謝東;論偵查階段律師為犯罪嫌疑人提供法律幫助制度[J];天中學(xué)刊;2004年06期

9 張萬順;;偵查階段有必要增設(shè)“犯罪嫌疑人”身份撤銷條款[J];人民檢察;2005年24期

10 高生發(fā);論偵查階段犯罪嫌疑人人權(quán)保障制度的缺陷及完善[J];吉首大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前6條

1 潘峰;;論我國(guó)律師介入偵查階段的困境與出路[A];使命與發(fā)展——第四屆西部律師發(fā)展論壇論文集[C];2011年

2 王泰清;;偵查階段律師“會(huì)見難”的法律思考[A];第二屆貴州法學(xué)論壇文集[C];2001年

3 錢學(xué)敏;張紅良;;偵查階段律師介入對(duì)未成年人合法權(quán)益的保障[A];第八屆國(guó)家高級(jí)檢察官論壇論文集：特別程序與檢察監(jiān)督[C];2012年

4 鄭廣宇;;偵查階段律師介入的幾個(gè)問題[A];第八屆國(guó)家高級(jí)檢察官論壇論文集：偵查程序的修改與檢察工作應(yīng)對(duì)[C];2012年

5 安天江;;淺論在偵查階段犯罪嫌疑人抗拒心理的表現(xiàn)形式及根源[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（二○一○年第2輯）[C];2010年

6 萬立;楊海燕;;淺談新《刑事訴訟法》框架下偵查階段的辯護(hù)實(shí)務(wù)[A];第五屆西部律師發(fā)展論壇論文集[C];2012年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 銅山縣檢察院 岳德成邋孟慶剛;偵查階段貪污賄賂嫌疑人的心理分析[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2007年

2 鄭州市中原區(qū)人民檢察院 張春玉 王洪濤;在偵查階段扎好證據(jù)鏈[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

3 淮安市淮安區(qū)檢察院 張旺 淮安區(qū)紀(jì)委 朱愛軍;偵查階段證據(jù)評(píng)估排除制度初探[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2013年

4 侯曉焱 劉秀仿 張翼;偵查階段律師會(huì)見率低[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2004年

5 四川省瀘縣人民檢察院 毛勁　唐倩;未成年犯罪嫌疑人指定辯護(hù)應(yīng)前置到偵查階段[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

6 鐘宗元 李舒文;犯罪嫌疑人偵查階段聘請(qǐng)律師的權(quán)利[N];人民法院報(bào);2006年

7 魯生;偵查階段通報(bào)案情不宜“拉滿弦”[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

8 王榮;偵查階段，律師的權(quán)利太沒保障[N];民主與法制時(shí)報(bào);2004年

9 朱敏玲;應(yīng)落實(shí)律師在偵查階段會(huì)見權(quán)[N];人民政協(xié)報(bào);2006年

10 北京大成律師事務(wù)所 杜永浩;偵查階段律師應(yīng)使用委托書[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 張永飛;論偵查階段的律師辯護(hù)權(quán)[D];河北大學(xué);2015年

2 郭罡正;論偵查階段律師與犯罪嫌疑人的會(huì)見與通信[D];中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院;2015年

3 于蕾;新刑訴法視域下偵查階段的刑事和解程序研究[D];山東大學(xué);2015年

4 萬子瑜;辯護(hù)律師偵查階段調(diào)查取證權(quán)研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2015年

5 高大成;論犯罪嫌疑人口供程序性規(guī)則[D];云南大學(xué);2015年

6 翟默;偵查階段律師辯護(hù)權(quán)完善的幾點(diǎn)思考[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2015年

7 歐陽(yáng)李純;我國(guó)偵查階段法律援助制度及其完善[D];中共中央黨校;2016年

8 劉朝;論我國(guó)偵查階段錯(cuò)案防治機(jī)制完善[D];中央民族大學(xué);2016年

9 張晨;偵查階段刑事案件媒體報(bào)道的規(guī)范研究[D];華僑大學(xué);2016年

10 卜言權(quán);刑事偵查階段犯罪嫌疑人人權(quán)保障研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：2116962