本文選題：民事訴訟 + 答辯　； 參考：《河北大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：答辯失權(quán)制度無論是在日本、德國具有代表性大陸法系國家，還是在英國、美國具有代表性的英美法系國家都已經(jīng)確立，，在司法實踐過程中有利于保護訴訟當事人、避免訴訟遲延、提高訴訟效益。然而，答辯失權(quán)制度在我國民事訴訟領(lǐng)域并沒有得到確立。我國的民事訴訟答辯制度為隨時提出主義，被告是否答辯，都不會影響法院審理案件。然而這種隨時提出答辯主義必然會導致當事人惡意不答辯等行為來拖延訴訟時間，程序進程緩慢，從而導致案件不能按照正常程序順利解決，當事人的訴訟利益受到損害。糾紛不能快速得到解決，就會加深矛盾，甚至嚴重損害司法的權(quán)威。為了避免這種現(xiàn)象的發(fā)生，有必要對我國民事訴訟答辯制度進行反思，應該盡快確立答辯失權(quán)制度。 本文主要論述民事訴訟答辯失權(quán)制度的相關(guān)理論，并提出如何構(gòu)建我國的民事訴訟答辯失權(quán)制度，正文分為四個部分。從兩大法系的主要國家設(shè)立的答辯失權(quán)制度進行分析，以便為我國確立答辯失權(quán)制度作為指導。然而我國民事訴訟的相關(guān)立法上并沒有確立答辯失權(quán)制度，并在司法實踐過程中討論缺少此制度帶來的不利后果，以這兩方面為基礎(chǔ)，來反思我國現(xiàn)行民事訴訟答辯制度，在此基礎(chǔ)上來討論具體在我國如何構(gòu)建民事訴訟答辯失權(quán)制度，為構(gòu)建答辯失權(quán)制度提供了可行性的土壤環(huán)境，那么答辯失權(quán)制度才能在我國民事訴訟法中成長，才會適應我國目前的司法現(xiàn)狀。筆者就我國確立答辯失權(quán)制度共提出四項立法建議，并論述了不適用答辯失權(quán)制度的情形。本文在結(jié)論部分呼吁我國民事訴訟法要注重答辯失權(quán)制度，對民事訴訟法進行修改，盡快確立此制度。
[Abstract]:Whether in Japan, Germany or the United Kingdom, the system of the loss of right of reply has been established in the United States, which is beneficial to the protection of litigants in the course of judicial practice. To avoid delay in litigation and improve the efficiency of litigation. However, the system of loss of right of defense has not been established in the field of civil litigation in China. The defense system of civil action in our country is always put forward, whether the defendant pleads or not will not affect the court hearing the case. However, this kind of doctrine of pleading at any time will inevitably cause the parties to delay the time of litigation and the process of proceeding is slow, resulting in the cases can not be resolved smoothly according to the normal procedure, and the interests of the litigants are damaged. Disputes can not be resolved quickly, will deepen contradictions, and even seriously undermine the authority of the judiciary. In order to avoid this kind of phenomenon, it is necessary to reflect on the defense system of civil action in our country, and establish the system of losing the right of defense as soon as possible. This paper mainly discusses the relevant theories of the system of civil action's loss of right of defense, and puts forward how to construct the system of civil lawsuit's loss of right of defense. The text is divided into four parts. This paper analyzes the system of the loss of the right of reply established by the main countries of the two legal systems, in order to establish the system of the loss of the right of reply as the guidance for our country. However, the relevant legislation of civil action in our country has not established the system of losing the right of reply, and in the course of judicial practice, we have discussed the adverse consequences brought by the lack of this system, and based on these two aspects, we have reflected on the current system of defense of civil action in our country. On this basis, this paper discusses how to construct the system of the loss of the right of defense in the civil litigation in China, which provides a feasible soil environment for the construction of the system of the loss of the right of reply, so that the system of the right of defense losing can grow in the civil procedure law of our country. Only then can we adapt to the current judicial situation in our country. The author puts forward four legislative proposals to establish the system of the loss of the right of reply in our country, and discusses the situation that does not apply to the system of the loss of the right of reply. In the conclusion part, this paper calls on our country's civil procedure law to pay attention to the system of the right of defense, to amend the law of civil procedure, and to establish this system as soon as possible.
【學位授予單位】：河北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 趙鋼;對被告應訴行為的定性分析[J];法學評論;1999年06期

2 李祖軍;民事訴訟答辯狀規(guī)則研究[J];法學評論;2002年04期

3 姜群,張倩;民事訴訟答辯性質(zhì)之探析[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學院學報;2004年03期

4 梁慧星;誠實信用原則與漏洞補充[J];法學研究;1994年02期

5 張衛(wèi)平;論民事訴訟中失權(quán)的正義性[J];法學研究;1999年06期

6 肖良平;;論我國民事訴訟答辯失權(quán)制度的構(gòu)建[J];求索;2006年01期

7 楊光;答辯失權(quán)之建構(gòu)[J];政法學刊;2004年01期

本文編號：2115588