本文選題：檢察機關(guān) + 刑事和解��； 參考：《華東政法大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑事和解制度是指對輕微刑事案件采用非刑事化和輕刑化方式處理的一種制度。我國2012年修改的《中華人民共和國刑事訴訟法》所確立的刑事和解制度充分體現(xiàn)了我國刑事司法活動多重價值的追求：既緩和了社會關(guān)系，又有助于構(gòu)建和諧社會；既提升了被害人的地位，又體現(xiàn)了以人為本；既節(jié)約了司法資源，又有利于提高訴訟效率。刑事和解制度的構(gòu)建在我國立法上是一個具有重要意義的突破，是我國刑事司法制度的重大創(chuàng)舉,已經(jīng)成為我國司法、理論界關(guān)注的熱點，但實踐中也遇到一些問題，需要不斷加以改進完善。本文結(jié)合修改后刑事訴訟法的有關(guān)規(guī)定及本人辦理刑事和解案件的工作實際，對我國刑事和解的含義、特征、意義、和解程序、存在問題和解決方式等問題進行了初步的探討。 在文章的第一部分闡述了刑事和解制度的含義、特征和意義。檢察環(huán)節(jié)中的刑事和解是指刑事案件在檢察階段，加害人真誠認罪悔罪，對被害人進行經(jīng)濟賠償、賠禮道歉、恢復(fù)名譽，與被害人達成和解，取得被害人諒解，檢察機關(guān)經(jīng)過審查予以確認，，對加害人做出不批準逮捕、不起訴或者建議法院對加害人從輕、減輕處罰的一種案件處理方式。刑事和解的特征有自主性、緩和性、互利性、修復(fù)性四點。刑事和解的意義包括刑事和解是構(gòu)建和諧社會的需要；刑事和解是以人為本思想的體現(xiàn)；刑事和解是刑罰改革發(fā)展的必然方向；刑事和解有利于提高訴訟效率、減少訴累。 在文章的第二部分，鑒于《中華人民共和國刑事訴訟法》、《人民檢察院刑事訴訟規(guī)則(試行)》兩個主要的法律規(guī)定關(guān)于刑事和解的程序性規(guī)定得不夠詳細，在實踐中引發(fā)了關(guān)于刑事和解具體適用的一些爭議，筆者不揣冒昧，根據(jù)自己的辦案經(jīng)驗，對檢察機關(guān)適用刑事和解的具體程序進行了一些研討，具體包括刑事和解的適用范圍、指導(dǎo)原則、和解程序、法律監(jiān)督等四個方面。 文章的第三個部分，對于筆者在具體辦理刑事和解案件中發(fā)現(xiàn)的實務(wù)方面的一些問題以及如何解決做一探討，具體有七個方面：其一、防止漠視刑事和解，辦案人員要從思想上重視刑事和解程序，重視刑事和解在構(gòu)建和諧社會、切實保障人權(quán)、提高訴訟效率等方面的作用；其二、防止濫用刑事和解，在實踐中對適用刑事和解的案件范圍要嚴格按照新刑事訴訟法在第五編特別程序中規(guī)定的刑事和解程序的適用范圍；其三、防止花錢買刑，辦案機關(guān)要嚴格審查被告人是否真誠悔罪；其四、防止漫天要價，刑事和解的主持人要說服被害人實事求是地提出賠償額度；其五、避免當事人反悔，浪費司法資源；其六、防止監(jiān)督不力，檢察機關(guān)要對當事雙方的和解嚴格進行審查，審查和解協(xié)議的合法性、公正性、可行性。其七、防止司法腐敗，要加強檢察機關(guān)內(nèi)部監(jiān)督和社會監(jiān)督。在整個刑事和解案件的辦理中檢察機關(guān)要充分發(fā)揮法律監(jiān)督的職能作用，嚴格依法辦案，切實做到辦理的每一個案件都能體現(xiàn)公平正義。
[Abstract]:The system of criminal reconciliation refers to a system of non criminalization and light punishment for minor criminal cases. The criminal reconciliation system established by the criminal procedure law of People's Republic of China amended in 2012 fully embodies the pursuit of multiple values in criminal judicial activities in China: it has both moderated the social relations and helped to build it. Harmonious society, which not only improves the status of the victims, but also embodies the people-oriented, not only saves the judicial resources, but also helps to improve the efficiency of the litigation. The construction of the criminal reconciliation system is a significant breakthrough in our country's legislation and is a major pioneering work in the criminal justice system of our country, which has already become the judicial and theoretical circles of our country. There are some problems in the practice, but there are also some problems in practice, which need to be improved and perfected. In this paper, the relevant provisions of the revised criminal procedure law and the actual work of the criminal reconciliation case have been discussed, and the implications, characteristics, significance, reconciliation procedures, questions and solutions of the criminal reconciliation in China are preliminarily discussed.
The first part of the article expounds the meaning, characteristics and significance of the criminal reconciliation system. The criminal reconciliation in the prosecution link refers to the criminal case in the procuratorial stage, the injuring person sincerely guilty of repentance, the economic compensation for the victim, the apology, the recovery of the reputation, the reconciliation with the victim, the understanding of the victim and the examination by the procuratorial organ. To confirm, do not approve the arrest of the injuring person, do not prosecute or suggest that the court will treat the injuring person with light and mitigate the punishment. The criminal reconciliation is characterized by autonomy, moderation, mutual benefit and four points of repair. The meaning of criminal reconciliation includes the need for criminal reconciliation to build a harmonious society; criminal reconciliation is an artificial person. The criminal reconciliation is the inevitable direction of the reform and development of criminal penalty; criminal reconciliation is conducive to improving the efficiency of litigation and reducing litigation fatigue.
In the second part of the article, in view of the criminal procedure law of the People's Republic of China, the rules of the criminal procedure of the people's Procuratorate (Trial), the procedural provisions of the two main legal provisions on the criminal reconciliation are not detailed enough. In practice, there are some disputes about the specific application of the criminal reconciliation. Experience, the specific procedures for the application of criminal reconciliation to the procuratorial organs are discussed, including the scope of the application of criminal reconciliation, the guiding principles, the procedure of reconciliation, and the legal supervision of four aspects.
The third part of the article is about the practical aspects of the criminal reconciliation cases and how to solve the problems. There are seven aspects: first, to prevent the indifference to criminal reconciliation, the case handling personnel should pay attention to the criminal reconciliation process in thought, pay attention to the criminal reconciliation in the construction of a harmonious society, and ensure that the criminal reconciliation in the construction of a harmonious society is effective. To prevent human rights and improve the efficiency of litigation; secondly, to prevent the abuse of criminal reconciliation, in practice, the scope of the application of criminal reconciliation in the scope of the criminal reconciliation procedure stipulated in the new criminal procedure law in the fifth series of special procedures should be strictly in accordance with the scope of the application of the criminal reconciliation procedure stipulated in the new criminal procedure law in the special procedure of the criminal procedure. The fourth, the compere of criminal reconciliation should persuade the victim to put forward the amount of compensation in a realistic way; fifth, avoid the parties' remorse and waste the judicial resources; six, to prevent the poor supervision, the procuratorial organ should strictly examine the reconciliation between the parties and examine the legality and impartiality of the settlement agreement. Seventh, to prevent judicial corruption, we should strengthen the internal supervision and social supervision of the procuratorial organs. In the handling of the whole criminal reconciliation cases, the procuratorial organs should give full play to the functional role of the legal supervision, run the cases strictly according to law, and do all the cases in practice can reflect the fairness and justice.
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【共引文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張敏婷;;淺析新刑訴法中辯護權(quán)的保護與實現(xiàn)[J];法制與社會;2014年03期

2 劉然;;從和諧社會的構(gòu)建解讀刑事和解制度[J];法制與社會;2014年08期

3 陳映珠;;論我國刑事司法中的人權(quán)保障[J];法治論壇;2014年01期

4 陳安楊;;偵查階段辯護權(quán)擴張的影響[J];法制與社會;2014年13期

5 忻鵬宇;;淺析刑事訴訟中“社會危險性”的法律含義[J];法制與社會;2014年13期

6 吳鐵洲;;論辯護律師會見制度的修改及其完善[J];當代教育理論與實踐;2014年04期

7 冷秀峰;;刑訴法修改后關(guān)于監(jiān)視居住制度的思考[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年07期

8 閻濤;苗彬;;刑事簡易程序改革的分析與思考[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年08期

9 章一磊;;新刑事訴訟法對律師辯護業(yè)務(wù)的影響[J];法制與社會;2014年16期

10 胡紅軍;王彪;;審判階段非法證據(jù)排除的若干疑難問題[J];法律適用;2014年08期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 張永進;李國;;論非法證據(jù)排除制度的人權(quán)價值基礎(chǔ)[A];第三屆河北法治論壇論文集[C];2012年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前10條

1 李娜妮;我國刑事強制醫(yī)療的困境與出路[D];湘潭大學;2013年

2 徐長格;“無逮捕必要”的實證分析[D];黑龍江大學;2013年

3 鐘喜陣;特別重大賄賂案件指定居所監(jiān)視居住研究[D];廈門大學;2014年

4 田源;附條件不起訴制度實證研究[D];華中師范大學;2014年

5 倪蕾;刑事和解制度的適用問題研究[D];安徽大學;2014年

6 李曉婷;我國刑事特別沒收程序研究[D];華中師范大學;2014年

7 張晶;未成年人附條件不起訴制度研究[D];吉林大學;2014年

8 武曉梅;論我國刑事拘留中的人權(quán)保障[D];海南大學;2013年

9 劉一鳴;口供任意性保障問題研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學;2014年

10 龔澤文;刑事被害人附帶民事訴訟權(quán)利保護研究[D];蘭州大學;2014年

本文編號：2085498