發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-30 05:14

  本文選題：民事執(zhí)行 + 執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督　； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：《民事訴訟法》是我國(guó)的一部基本法律，是我們進(jìn)行民事訴訟活動(dòng)、維護(hù)自身合法權(quán)益的重要保障，也是檢察機(jī)關(guān)開(kāi)展民事檢察監(jiān)督的基本法律依據(jù)。我國(guó)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的迅速發(fā)展與社會(huì)機(jī)制的不斷變革使得原來(lái)的《民事訴訟法》已不能滿足當(dāng)前社會(huì)的需要，對(duì)其進(jìn)行修改已經(jīng)十分的必要。因此，在司法實(shí)踐不斷探索的基礎(chǔ)上及廣大專家學(xué)者持續(xù)不斷的努力之下，第十一屆全國(guó)人大常委會(huì)第28次會(huì)議于2012年8月31日表決通過(guò)了《民事訴訟法》的修改決定，其中強(qiáng)化檢察監(jiān)督是此次修改的一大重點(diǎn)，修改過(guò)后的《民事訴訟法》進(jìn)一步明確了檢察機(jī)關(guān)的法律監(jiān)督的地位，并在多個(gè)方面增設(shè)了對(duì)檢察監(jiān)督的規(guī)定，為民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督工作全面開(kāi)展奠定了堅(jiān)實(shí)的法律基礎(chǔ)。與此同時(shí)，法律的規(guī)定并不是方方面面的，在一定程度上多多少少還是有漏洞的，新的民事訴訟法在今后的實(shí)施過(guò)程中，也不乏會(huì)有新問(wèn)題的出現(xiàn)。因此，對(duì)于民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督工作來(lái)說(shuō)，，此次民事訴訟法的修改對(duì)其提出了更高的要求，機(jī)遇與挑戰(zhàn)是并存的。也就是民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督在目前雖然以基本法的形式獲得了確認(rèn)，在司法實(shí)踐中也積累了一定的經(jīng)驗(yàn)，但監(jiān)督的實(shí)踐中還是面臨著諸多的困境是需要亟待解決的。 關(guān)于民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督這一問(wèn)題已經(jīng)有很多的學(xué)者研究過(guò)，筆者在借鑒此前研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上，同時(shí)基于對(duì)民事執(zhí)行活動(dòng)本身的尊重、堅(jiān)持依法監(jiān)督及不對(duì)人民法院執(zhí)行工作造成不當(dāng)干預(yù)的原則，對(duì)該問(wèn)題提出自己的粗淺看法。本論文除了引言和結(jié)語(yǔ)外，共分為五大部分： 第一部分簡(jiǎn)要的從我國(guó)檢察機(jī)關(guān)的性質(zhì)和職能及民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督的內(nèi)涵上概述了我國(guó)民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督的大致情況，主要涉及到對(duì)一些基本概念的厘清，這也是寫(xiě)作本論文最基本的基點(diǎn)和起點(diǎn)。 第二部分主要從立法規(guī)定上的缺失、司法實(shí)踐運(yùn)作上存有諸多問(wèn)題的角度對(duì)我國(guó)民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督的現(xiàn)狀作了一個(gè)整體上的分析，進(jìn)而突出在我國(guó)建立民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督的必要性和重要性。 第三部分主要是從幾個(gè)不同的角度對(duì)我國(guó)民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督在哪些方面存在著的困境作了分析，因?yàn)橐虢鉀Q一個(gè)問(wèn)題，就要首先認(rèn)清問(wèn)題的癥結(jié)在何處，故這一部分的對(duì)困境的描述主要是為下文所述的困境之解決做鋪墊的。 第四部分從立法機(jī)關(guān)方面、法檢兩系統(tǒng)方面有針對(duì)性地對(duì)我國(guó)民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督所存在上述困境的原因作出了筆者自己一些疏淺的看法。 第五部分主要是對(duì)上述一部分執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督所存在的困境給出了筆者自己的一些不成熟的解決辦法，這一部分也是本論文的重心之所在。主要對(duì)民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督所應(yīng)貫徹的基本原則、監(jiān)督的范圍、方式、管轄、保障措施及與其他相關(guān)制度的協(xié)作等方面作了較具體的分析，以求對(duì)我國(guó)民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督所面臨困境的解決貢獻(xiàn)一份綿薄的力量。
[Abstract]:The Civil procedure Law is a basic law of our country. It is an important guarantee for us to carry out civil litigation activities and safeguard our own legitimate rights and interests. It is also the basic legal basis for procuratorial organs to carry out civil procuratorial supervision. With the rapid development of market economy and the continuous change of social mechanism, the original Civil procedure Law can not meet the needs of the current society, so it is necessary to modify it. Therefore, on the basis of the continuous exploration of judicial practice and the continuous efforts of the vast number of experts and scholars, the 28th meeting of the standing Committee of the Eleventh National people's Congress voted on 31 August 2012 to adopt the decision on the amendment of the Civil procedure Law. Among them, strengthening procuratorial supervision is a major focus of this revision. The revised "Civil procedure Law" further clarifies the legal supervision status of procuratorial organs, and has added provisions on procuratorial supervision in many aspects. For the civil execution of procuratorial supervision work to lay a solid legal foundation. At the same time, the provisions of the law are not all aspects, to a certain extent, there are still loopholes, the new civil procedure law in the future implementation process, there will be some new problems. Therefore, for the supervision of civil execution, the revision of the civil procedure law puts forward higher requirements, opportunities and challenges coexist. That is, the procuratorial supervision of civil execution has been confirmed in the form of basic law and accumulated some experience in judicial practice, but the practice of supervision still faces many difficulties that need to be solved urgently. On the issue of procuratorial supervision of civil execution has been studied by many scholars. Based on the previous research results and respect for civil enforcement activities, This paper insists on the principle of supervising according to law and not unduly interfering in the execution of the work of the people's court, and puts forward his own superficial views on this issue. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this thesis is divided into five parts: the first part briefly summarizes the general situation of the procuratorial supervision of civil execution in China from the nature and function of the procuratorial organ and the connotation of the civil execution procuratorial supervision. It mainly involves the clarification of some basic concepts, which is the most basic point and starting point of this thesis. The second part mainly analyzes the current situation of procuratorial supervision of civil execution in our country from the point of view of the lack of legislation and regulations and the problems in judicial practice. Furthermore, the necessity and importance of establishing procuratorial supervision of civil execution in China are highlighted. The third part is mainly from several different angles to our country civil execution procuratorial supervision in which aspects of the plight of analysis, because in order to solve a problem, we must first understand where the crux of the problem lies. Therefore, this part of the description of the plight is mainly for the settlement of the plight described below. In the fourth part, the author makes some superficial views on the reasons of the above difficulties in our country's civil execution procuratorial supervision from the legislative organs and the two systems of law and procuratorial inspection. The fifth part mainly gives some immature solutions to the difficulties existing in the execution of procuratorial supervision in the above part, which is also the focus of this paper. It mainly analyzes the basic principles, the scope, the way, the jurisdiction, the safeguard measures and the cooperation with other relevant systems of civil execution procuratorial supervision. In order to solve the difficulties faced by the procuratorial supervision of civil execution in China, contribute a modest force.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.18

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李浩;;目的論視域中的民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督對(duì)象解讀[J];法商研究;2011年02期

2 傅郁林;;我國(guó)民事檢察權(quán)的權(quán)能與程序配置[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2012年06期

3 王秋杰;陳凱琳;;民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督的制度設(shè)計(jì)——評(píng)新《民事訴訟法》第235條[J];河北公安警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期

4 牟逍媛;民事執(zhí)行權(quán)的性質(zhì)[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

5 劉芬霞;侯明;;論我國(guó)民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督制度的構(gòu)建[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2011年07期

6 ;《民事訴訟法》修訂重要問(wèn)題研究[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年04期

7 楊榮馨;;略論強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行的檢察監(jiān)督[J];人民檢察;2007年13期

8 童兆洪;改革語(yǔ)境中的民事執(zhí)行權(quán)配置理論[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2005年02期

9 張明敏;;我國(guó)民事執(zhí)行監(jiān)督制度的檢討與重構(gòu)[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

10 譚秋桂;;民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督的對(duì)象、方式及其保障[J];人民檢察;2012年21期

本文編號(hào)：2085059