本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權(quán) + 權(quán)利屬性�。� 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：公益訴訟立法被提上日程經(jīng)歷了很長時(shí)間的努力,新《民事訴訟法》的頒布將公益訴訟制度納入法律層級的保護(hù),填補(bǔ)了我國公益訴訟立法的空白,這也是十余年理論探索與司法實(shí)踐努力的結(jié)果。然而在法律規(guī)定中,公益訴訟制度的適用集中在環(huán)境污染案件與保護(hù)廣大消費(fèi)者合法權(quán)益的案件里,對于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域是否適用公益訴訟制度未做出明文規(guī)定�；谥R產(chǎn)權(quán)的人權(quán)屬性、公益屬性、公共政策屬性等,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域可借鑒公益訴訟保護(hù)公共利益的職責(zé),建立知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公益訴訟保護(hù)的有效模式。 首先,本文介紹了研究背景、相關(guān)理論綜述以及研究方法等,從我國第一件知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域公益訴訟的案件談起,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域引入公益訴訟制度仍處于立法空白的地方,需要進(jìn)一步完善法律規(guī)定。 其次,本文概述公益訴訟的歷史發(fā)展過程,對公益訴訟制度的相關(guān)概念加以界定,一是公共利益的界定,二是團(tuán)體訴訟、集團(tuán)訴訟以及代表人訴訟的概念分析。 再次,從知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的權(quán)利屬性出發(fā),分析知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域引入公益訴訟制度的必要性。知識產(chǎn)權(quán)是具有很強(qiáng)公益屬性的私權(quán),這與公益訴訟保護(hù)社會公益的目的高度契合,并且知識產(chǎn)權(quán)具有的人權(quán)屬性與公共政策屬性也有公益訴訟制度保護(hù)的現(xiàn)實(shí)需要。此外,現(xiàn)有的對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利保護(hù)的救濟(jì)方式還不夠全面,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的多元屬性要求其司法救濟(jì)方式也具有多元化特點(diǎn),公益訴訟制度對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)能夠更全面的體現(xiàn)社會正義價(jià)值、利益平衡價(jià)值以及知識創(chuàng)新價(jià)值。 最后,研究知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域引入公益訴訟制度的具體安排,公益訴訟制度的理論發(fā)展已經(jīng)為其提供了基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案件的特殊性,從知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公益訴訟的原告、受案范圍、證明責(zé)任、激勵機(jī)制、制裁手段等方面,完善制度構(gòu)建。 公益訴訟是社會成員保護(hù)社會公共利益的工具,需要社會各界對公共利益的關(guān)注和責(zé)任心,實(shí)踐中需要法院在公益訴訟的運(yùn)作過程中發(fā)現(xiàn)問題、解決問題,本文著眼于在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域引入公益訴訟制度,希望公益訴訟制度能更好地發(fā)揮其維護(hù)社會公益的價(jià)值追求。
[Abstract]:The legislation of public interest litigation has been put on the agenda for a long time. The promulgation of the new Civil procedure Law brings the public interest litigation system into the protection of the legal hierarchy and fills the gap in the legislation of public interest litigation in our country. This is also the result of more than ten years of theoretical exploration and judicial practice. However, in the legal provisions, the application of the public interest litigation system is concentrated in the environmental pollution cases and the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of consumers, and there is no explicit provision as to whether the public interest litigation system is applicable in the field of intellectual property rights. Based on the human rights attribute, public interest attribute and public policy attribute of intellectual property, the field of intellectual property can draw lessons from the duty of public interest protection in public interest litigation, and establish an effective mode of public interest litigation protection of intellectual property. First of all, this paper introduces the research background, relevant theoretical review and research methods, starting from the first case of public interest litigation in the field of intellectual property rights in China, the introduction of public interest litigation system in the field of intellectual property is still in the legislative blank. Legal provisions need to be further improved. Secondly, this paper outlines the historical development process of public interest litigation, defines the relevant concepts of public interest litigation system, the first is the definition of public interest, and the second is the concept analysis of group action, class action and representative action. Thirdly, the necessity of introducing the public interest litigation system in the field of intellectual property is analyzed from the property of intellectual property. Intellectual property is a private right with strong commonweal property, which is highly consistent with the purpose of public interest litigation to protect social public welfare, and the human rights attribute and public policy attribute of intellectual property also have the practical need of public interest litigation system protection. In addition, the existing remedies for the protection of intellectual property rights are not comprehensive enough. The protection of intellectual property rights in public interest litigation system can more fully reflect the value of social justice, the value of balance of interests and the value of knowledge innovation. Finally, to study the specific arrangements for introducing the public interest litigation system into the field of intellectual property, the theoretical development of the public interest litigation system has already provided it with a foundation, combining the particularity of the intellectual property rights case, from the plaintiff of the intellectual property public interest litigation, accepting the scope of the case, Prove responsibility, incentive mechanism, sanction means and so on, perfect the system construction. Public interest litigation is a tool for social members to protect social public interests, which requires the attention and responsibility of all sectors of the society. In practice, it is necessary for the courts to find problems and solve problems in the course of the operation of public interest litigation. This paper focuses on the introduction of public interest litigation system in the field of intellectual property rights, hoping that the public interest litigation system can better play its value pursuit of safeguarding social public welfare.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉學(xué)在;;團(tuán)體訴訟制度概念辨析[J];北方法學(xué);2010年01期

2 張千帆;“公共利益”的構(gòu)成——對行政法的目標(biāo)以及“平衡”的意義之探討[J];比較法研究;2005年05期

3 徐家力;;律師與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公益訴訟[J];中國司法;2010年04期

4 劉友華;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公益訴訟之我見[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2007年04期

5 胡艷美;邱曦;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公益訴訟[J];法制與社會;2009年04期

6 陳卓;左玲;;淺談提起我國民事公益訴訟的主體[J];法制與社會;2010年05期

7 鄭家紅;凌宗亮;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)公益訴訟探析[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

8 韓波;;公益訴訟制度的力量組合[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2013年01期

9 趙文婷;易萍;;民事公益訴訟之范圍探討[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年02期

10 郝秀梅;;論我國檢察監(jiān)督機(jī)制的完善——以民事訴訟的執(zhí)行為視角[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年02期

，

本文編號：2028219